Plus everything they ever had, hypothetical values about tomorrow when genetic incoming are left alive simply adapting to the moment one at a time since conceived.
Why don't you ask Hillary?
Zeet,Zeets2 » 20 Nov 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ Why don't you ask Hillary?
She's the criminal who smashed her cell phones and disk drives and used Bleach-bit to hide over 35,000 of her emails that were under subpoena, and should have been prosecuted for that crime except for the corrupt DOJ under Obama.
Apparently, she needed to use her "burnbag" to cover her ugly puss!
Where's yours?FJB » 20 Nov 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ You are a liar... you gave a description of what a woman does.
Oh, so you consider it a fantasy that Hillary destroyed evidence of her crimes which were under subpoena?Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ Zeet,
We must proceed from the Facts, not your Fantasies.
Long passed time you should have used to educate yourself to the crimes your beloved Magic Negro allowed, soyboy!FBI failed to probe key thumb drives in Clinton email probe: DOJ watchdog filesBy Ryan King and Josh Christenson July 21, 2025WASHINGTON — The FBI barely glanced at potentially crucial evidence in its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state, according to a portion of a watchdog report made public Monday.A confidential source gave thumb drives to the FBI that contained State Department data acquired via cyber intrusions — including emails from President Barack Obama and others, according to a declassified appendix to a June 2018 Justice Department inspector general report.But the feds declined to “comprehensively” analyze those drives due to concerns about individual data caught up in the hack — despite an internal draft memo concluding it was necessary to “assess the national security risks” pertaining to Clinton’s private server use.“This document shows an extreme lack of effort and due diligence in the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s email usage and mishandling of highly classified information,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) of the appendix.
Zeet,Zeets2 » 20 Nov 2025, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, so you consider it a fantasy that Hillary destroyed evidence of her crimes which were under subpoena?
Hasn't it already been established that she sent classified information back and forth to Obama and sex pervert Anthony Weiner's wife Huma Abedin in illegal, unsecured emails? You see no problem with Abedin's perverted husband having access to classified material while he's sending dick pix to young underage girls?
Long passed time you should have used to educate yourself to the crimes your beloved Magic Negro allowed, soyboy!
Have you tried metamucil for your obvious diarrhea?Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Zeet,
You're a **** idiot..
Who was POTUS in 2018 - the year of the IG report?
Following Comey’s public statement on July 5, the Midyear prosecutors finalized their recommendation that the Department decline prosecution of Clinton, her senior aides, and the senders of emails determined to contain classified information. On July 6, the Midyear prosecutors briefed Lynch, Yates, Comey, other members of Department and FBI leadership, and FBI Midyear team members about the basis for the declination recommendation. Lynch subsequently issued a short public statement that she met with the career prosecutors and agents who conducted the investigation and “received and accepted their unanimous recommendation” that the investigation be closed without charges.
We found that the prosecutors considered five federal statutes:
18 U.S.C. §§ 793(d) and (e) (willful mishandling of documents or information relating to the national defense);
18 U.S.C. § 793(f) (removal, loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction of documents or information relating to the national defense through gross negligence, or failure to report such removal, loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction);
18 U.S.C. § 1924 (unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material by government employees); and
18 U.S.C. § 2071 (concealment, removal, or mutilation of government records).
As described in Chapter Seven of our report, the prosecutors concluded that the evidence did not support prosecution under any of these statutes for various reasons,
That's from the IG report in question, *******RebelGator » 20 Nov 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Have you tried metamucil for your obvious diarrhea?
You're blowing crap out of your *** in prodigious amounts, crap without foundation.
You're the idiot!Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Zeet,
You're a **** idiot..
Who was POTUS in 2018 - the year of the IG report?
Following Comey’s public statement on July 5, the Midyear prosecutors finalized their recommendation that the Department decline prosecution of Clinton, her senior aides, and the senders of emails determined to contain classified information. On July 6, the Midyear prosecutors briefed Lynch, Yates, Comey, other members of Department and FBI leadership, and FBI Midyear team members about the basis for the declination recommendation. Lynch subsequently issued a short public statement that she met with the career prosecutors and agents who conducted the investigation and “received and accepted their unanimous recommendation” that the investigation be closed without charges.
We found that the prosecutors considered five federal statutes:
18 U.S.C. §§ 793(d) and (e) (willful mishandling of documents or information relating to the national defense);
18 U.S.C. § 793(f) (removal, loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction of documents or information relating to the national defense through gross negligence, or failure to report such removal, loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction);
18 U.S.C. § 1924 (unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material by government employees); and
18 U.S.C. § 2071 (concealment, removal, or mutilation of government records).
As described in Chapter Seven of our report, the prosecutors concluded that the evidence did not support prosecution under any of these statutes for various reasons,
Zeets2 » 20 Nov 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ You're the idiot!
Who was president when Hillary received her subpoena and committed the felonies of destroying evidence and using an unsecure email while sending classified and top secret information in 2016 when her crimes were committed?
read the text in bold again.and committed the felonies
Facts are contextual interpretations of results naturally formed evolving forward into new details never duplicated again balancing out as current events universally present in plain sight relative to geographical position, genetically proportionately inhabiting space ancestrally alive since conceived, so far.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ Zeet,
We must proceed from the Facts, not your Fantasies.
the irony of text has two forms, pre-text and con-text suggesting anything else is possible.
Oh, you mean how a DEMOCRAT prosecutor and Hillary supporter covered up for the obvious crimes Hillary committed for her many felonies that actually bordered on treason?
Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2025, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ What are Pam and Tulsi working on for you, Ruby?
BURN BAGS!
You know you people are morons, right?
FJB » 21 Nov 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ you and the rest of the libtards are getting your asses stomped daily