Mrkelly » 24 Nov 2025, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑
let me guess … for the confederacy?![]()
gotta link to those “vast majority” numbers?
I won’t hold my breath
@Mrkelly gets his numbers.Huey » 24 Nov 2025, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑Military veterans remain a Republican group, backing Trump over Harris by wide marginMrkelly » 24 Nov 2025, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑let me guess … for the confederacy?SouthernFried » 23 Nov 2025, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ And the vast majority of veterans and service members absolutely despise what Democrats such as yourself stand for. Your point is moot. You're an absolute **** moron.
I actually served in the . You didn't.![]()
gotta link to those “vast majority” numbers?
I won’t hold my breath
ByJoseph Copeland
Military veterans have long tended to affiliate with the Republican Party and support Republican candidates, and that remains the case today.
About six-in-ten registered voters who say they have served in the U.S. military or military reserves (61%) support former President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, while 37% back Vice President Kamala Harris, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in early September.
Veterans’ vote preferences are on par with past elections. In 2020, 60% of veteran validated voters cast their ballot for Trump, while 39% backed President Joe Biden. And in 2016, veterans voted for Trump over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by a similar margin (61% to 35%).
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads ... de-margin/
KELLY after he gets his numbers\Mrkelly » 24 Nov 2025, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑I don’t care what they didHuey » 24 Nov 2025, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Military veterans remain a Republican group, backing Trump over Harris by wide margin
ByJoseph Copeland
Military veterans have long tended to affiliate with the Republican Party and support Republican candidates, and that remains the case today.
About six-in-ten registered voters who say they have served in the U.S. military or military reserves (61%) support former President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, while 37% back Vice President Kamala Harris, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in early September.
Veterans’ vote preferences are on par with past elections. In 2020, 60% of veteran validated voters cast their ballot for Trump, while 39% backed President Joe Biden. And in 2016, veterans voted for Trump over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by a similar margin (61% to 35%).
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads ... de-margin/
I care what the do in 26
If you can’t see that tRump is an egotistical, uncaring, down right ignorant mother ****
one that is doing the best he can to stay out of jail or even stay alive by being the oligarchs bitch
I can’t help you
Posts: 8644Contact: Huey » 25 Nov 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑
25 Nov 2025, 6:02 am
Hey laughing man, you wan Ted to see the numbers. Now you don’t care? You got what the **** you asked for.
Don’t go away mad, just go away.
Huey » 27 Nov 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ KELLY after he gets his numbers\
as well as this:
Mrkelly
![]()
Posts: 8644Contact:
Contact MrkellyMoney: 73,526
where did I “ask for numbers “ ?
Keep running from your words
Huey » 27 Nov 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ Keep reading. Since you hide your triggered nature with laugh emojis some of them block the code for the multi post option. I couldn't do it all in one.
Posting the same pic over and over DOES NOT explain how in one post you ask for a link to the numbers and then after you get that link you then rant you don't care what the did in 2024 and then imply you didn't ask for them.
YOU sound triggered to me. This is not the first time you have done this.
Huey » 27 Nov 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ Posting the same pic over and over DOES NOT explain how in one post you ask for a link to the numbers and then after you get that link you then rant you don't care what the did in 2024 and then imply you didn't ask for them.
Why are you running from words, AGAIN!
Posting the same pic over and over DOES NOT explain how in one post you ask for a link to the numbers and then after you get that link you then rant you don't care what the did in 2024 and then imply you didn't ask for them.
Why are you running from words, AGAIN!
Mrkelly » 22 Nov 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Six democrats that are veterans reminding the troops of their oath
“don’t give up the ship”
Symbol of perseverance: It serves as a symbol of national resolve and the importance of honor, courage, and commitment, particularly for those in the military
Why are you afraid of your own words? I don't even have to insult you. Just repost your actions.Posting the same pic over and over DOES NOT explain how in one post you ask for a link to the numbers and then after you get that link you then rant you don't care what the did in 2024 and then imply you didn't ask for them.
Why are you running from words, AGAIN!
Huey » 27 Nov 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Man, now you are getting serious. No laughing emoji.
Why are you afraid of your own words? I don't even have to insult you. Just repost your actions.
wrong------ based on military facts-----nefarious101 » 19 Nov 2025, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑ The plot thickens...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democr ... h-responds
You're an idiot, you post crap that you have absolutely no idea what it means.jerrab » 27 Nov 2025, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ wrong------ based on military facts-----
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) says that service members must “obey any lawful general order or regulation.” There is a strong presumption that orders are lawful under military law, according to the NIMJ. But service members are allowed to disobey unlawful orders—and they could even be prosecuted for carrying out patently unlawful orders, such as war crimes.