Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ U.S. pushing Ukraine to sign peace deal by Thanksgiving or lose support
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... nksgiving/
With friends like these.....
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
I thought your slogan was "No one's been harder on Pootie....than his holster."
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I thought your slogan was "No one's been harder on Pootie....than his holster."
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Vegas » 21 Nov 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
Deal:
It's just another question, out of a 400-mile-long list, that BV keeps evading. Since it pisses him off, I make it a point to keep posting it.
I won't pay for the Wash.ComPost.Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ U.S. pushing Ukraine to sign peace deal by Thanksgiving or lose support
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... nksgiving/
With friends like these.....
You can't afford your restitution and you are going back to prison PedoRoad. :)roadkill » 21 Nov 2025, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I won't pay for the Wash.ComPost.
BTW...Benson, aka: Beanie used to say "Pootie".
Is Benson slipped in with you and the Shambo Twins?
Roshambo » 21 Nov 2025, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't afford your restitution and you are going back to prison PedoRoad.
Tell him yourself, PedoRoad.
I already did...Bbot said you were stupid and couldn't read his scripts correctly.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/22/us/p ... emlin.htmlBlackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ U.S. pushing Ukraine to sign peace deal by Thanksgiving or lose support
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... nksgiving/
With friends like these.....
So nitwit, you think it was a far better idea to continue throwing hundreds of billions of our taxpayer dollars as Biden did to prop up the most corrupt country in Europe while he took millions in kickbacks from it to enrich his whole family?? If Zelensky thinks he can survive against Russia without our support, then let him refuse the Trump plan and watch him continue to lose even more land to Russia along with a few thousand more soldiers on both sides. Sooner or later he WILL take a peace deal that Trump is offering and THAT will win him the peace prize that you'll hate to see, regardless of how that worthless left-wing award is anywayBlackvegetable » 22 Nov 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/22/us/p ... emlin.html
“The Ukraine plan clearly violates Ukraine’s sovereignty and its territorial integrity,” said Douglas Lute, a retired Army general who served many years in Europe and then worked on the national security councils of Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. “The common theme for this White House is that there are vague, unenforceable terms, offered without coordination from all parties involved.”
That is clear from the details of the draft peace proposal that leaked this week, after Mr. Trump’s Army secretary finally shared it with the Ukrainians themselves.
White House officials initially insisted that the document — drafted with no input from the Ukrainians, the European allies or the Congress
Mr. Peace Prize has got this!
Surely no one denies the "Grafty's Golden Showers" series any longer...
Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I thought your slogan was "No one's been harder on Pootie....than his holster."

I said that you're a cretin and a coward.roadkill » 21 Nov 2025, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I already did...Bbot said you were stupid and couldn't read his scripts correctly.
Bbot also said you were the best cock-port in town...so I said OK...we'll let it slide this time.![]()
![]()