Liberal Forum

Mrkelly » 01 Dec 2025, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 4:11 pm

seems that is all he has

you reduced him to a copy and paste bot

Probably why he won't read his own ****...

Mrkelly » 01 Dec 2025, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2025, 4:11 pm

seems that is all he has

you reduced him to a copy and paste bot

                        You are defending the copy/paste king. Show me one intelligent thought of his own. He copies the internet for that.

@Vegas  


Does this 

viewtopic.php?p=2820662#p2820662


explain why you don't read your own ****?

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 10:54 am

@Vegas  

Does this 

viewtopic.php?p=2820662#p2820662

explain why you don't read your own ****?

Are these my words?

Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking.

@Vegas  


I don't believe you.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 11:07 am

@Vegas  

I don't believe you.

   

Vegas » 02 Dec 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 10:32 am

                        You are defending the copy/paste king. Show me one intelligent thought of his own. He copies the internet for that.

I can say the same for you

you paste the same **** over and over and over again 

Mrkelly » 02 Dec 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 11:09 am

I can say the same for you

you paste the same **** over and over and over again

Nope. Only to him. It only proves how far he will go to evade. He will dodge a question for years. he will even put me on ignore just so he doesn't have to answer...while demanding answers to his questions. 

This is a win-win for me and a lose-lose for him. If he doesn't answer, then it proves his cowardice. If he does, he will get it wrong anyway because he has no idea how to explain what option he chooses. Win-win for me. Lose-lose for him.

Vegas » 02 Dec 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 11:12 am

Nope. Only to him. It only proves how far he will go to evade. He will dodge a question for years. he will even put me on ignore just so he doesn't have to answer...while demanding answers to his questions. 

This is a win-win for me and a lose-lose for him. If he doesn't answer, then it proves his cowardice. If he does, he will get it wrong anyway because he has no idea how to explain what option he chooses. Win-win for me. Lose-lose for him.

OK

Mrkelly » 02 Dec 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 11:14 am

OK

This is very simple...


@Vegas  once posted this...


viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697

Read all of this you piece of ****. Not just 5 words.  @Blackvegetable on another note, you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 
 

in the three years he's been running from that ****, I have posted

a dictionary definition

a definition in my own words


and the answer to the question by explaining why 3 of 4 examples fail a fundamental test.


He can't even post an example.

Just so you know.

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 11:40 am

This is very simple...

@Vegas  once posted this...

viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697

in the three years he's been running from that ****, I have posted

a dictionary definition

a definition in my own words

and the answer to the question by explaining why 3 of 4 examples fail a fundamental test.

He can't even post an example.

Just so you know.

      Notice he never answered @Mrkelly   He continues to turn it on me. He always will. The question has never asked for the definition. Ever. At all. Yet, he always goes back to that.

He knows how to end this. he just needs to rip off the band-aid by getting it wrong. then it ends. That's it. 

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 11:40 am

This is very simple...

@Vegas  once posted this...

viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697

in the three years he's been running from that ****, I have posted

a dictionary definition

a definition in my own words

and the answer to the question by explaining why 3 of 4 examples fail a fundamental test.

He can't even post an example.

Just so you know.

I took a look

this SAME conversation has been going on for over 3 years ?  

all I can say is 

[img]blob:618c519f-9872-45cb-baba-c37adbc90e02[/img]
https://media.tenor.com/CAMGptTXVpAAAAAM/fish-yoink.gif

 
 

Mrkelly » 02 Dec 2025, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 1:56 pm

I took a look

this SAME conversation has been going on for over 3 years ?  

all I can say is 

[img]blob:618c519f-9872-45cb-baba-c37adbc90e02[/img]
https://media.tenor.com/CAMGptTXVpAAAAAM/fish-yoink.gif

Yes, I hooked him. Every time. Win-win for me.         

Vegas » 02 Dec 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 1:57 pm

Yes, I hooked him. Every time. Win-win for me.       

  OK

Whatever helps you get by 

Mrkelly » 02 Dec 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 2:02 pm

  OK

Whatever helps you get by

Of course you are going to defend him. You are both liberals. Duh. 

How about you look at it through a more neutral lens. If you do, you will see he is destroying himself. I am not even doing anything.   

Mrkelly » 02 Dec 2025, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 1:56 pm

I took a look

this SAME conversation has been going on for over 3 years ?  

all I can say is 

[img]blob:618c519f-9872-45cb-baba-c37adbc90e02[/img]
https://media.tenor.com/CAMGptTXVpAAAAAM/fish-yoink.gif

Now you understand why I decline to participate.

Vegas » 02 Dec 2025, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 2:05 pm

Of course you are going to defend him. You are both liberals. Duh. 

How about you look at it through a more neutral lens. If you do, you will see he is destroying himself. I am not even doing anything. 

  dude

your obsession with him is something else

you even have his name under your avatar   

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 3:03 pm

Now you understand why I decline to participate.

the post in quote shows you do participate without decline. You stand your ground defending ideas life isn't self evident position being alive now in a series parallel perpetual balancing outcomes inhabiting space being part of this universal moment living doesn't duplicate what each reproduction becomes tomorrow, isolated by ancestral position of specific chromosomes streaming with DNA ancestral lineages sustaining ever hanging population "left" alive per hearts beating forward now, daily here.

Mrkelly » 02 Dec 2025, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2025, 3:48 pm

  dude

your obsession with him is something else

you even have his name under your avatar 

I didn't write that. Cannon put there after I kicked his ***.  

And there you go again. Defending your fellow liberal. I guess it has never occurred to you that he tags me incessantly and daily.     

Prediction:
1. You will continue to put your foot in your mouth in the name of defending your butt buddy.

Vegas » 03 Dec 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 10:01 am

I didn't write that. Cannon put there after I kicked his ***.  

And there you go again. Defending your fellow liberal. I guess it has never occurred to you that he tags me incessantly and daily.     

Prediction:
1. You will continue to put your foot in your mouth in the name of defending your butt buddy.

**** 

I remember you asking CP to do that