Someone on ZIONHedge said the goal of the Tiny Hat Foreskin Ch0mperZ - thru the instigation of wars - is to blow off the nutsacks of as many whYTEs as possible.Cannonpointer » 21 Nov 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The gay homosexual conjobs all insisted that Russia was losing. That *** Zeke went into high dudgeon, clutching his pearls at the very SUGGESTION that Coupkraine would lose.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tell us how the war will end, @Zeets2 we need another laugh at your expense.
MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ As someone who really does not give a **** about the biden/ukraine war, this is my unbiased observation from the news......Russia’s losses in manpower and equipment are catastrophic, undermining its long-term "military strength". Despite the losses, Russia still holds large swaths of Ukraine and continues offensive operations. The war is not a clear win for either side. Ukraine resists fiercely, but Russia’s sheer scale and willingness to absorb losses prevent outright defeat.
Pretty much any strategy achieving such an objective would be celebrated - by anyone with a whit of sense...doing so for little more than a year in Iraqnam is **** genius.As someone who really does not give a **** about the biden/ukraine war, this is my unbiased observation from the news......Russia’s losses in manpower and equipment are catastrophic, undermining its long-term "military strength".
You're drunk on propaganda. The saddest part about THAT is that the propaganda you have swallowed comes from the exact same sources that tell you a man can "become" a woman. That makes you a fruit, by definition. A not man.MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ As someone who really does not give a **** about the biden/ukraine war, this is my unbiased observation from the news......Russia’s losses in manpower and equipment are catastrophic, undermining its long-term "military strength". Despite the losses, Russia still holds large swaths of Ukraine and continues offensive operations. The war is not a clear win for either side. Ukraine resists fiercely, but Russia’s sheer scale and willingness to absorb losses prevent outright defeat.
Why are you a gay?Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Pretty much any strategy achieving such an objective would be celebrated - by anyone with a whit of sense...doing so for little more than a year in Iraqnam is **** genius.
Cretin.
Russia’s war effort is sustained by a small but critical group of allies: North Korea (troops), Iran (drones/ammunition), China (industrial support), and Belarus (logistics). Without them, Moscow’s ability to continue large-scale operations would be severely weakened..............Russia has lost more than twice as many troops as Ukraine. This imbalance highlights the unsustainable cost of Russia’s attritional strategy, even though it continues to hold territory.Cannonpointer » 21 Nov 2025, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑ The Coupkrainians are fielding soldiers from Colombia and Peru and France and England and all points in between. The entire west - the EU, the UK, and the US combined - has fed Coupkraine money and material and mercenaries and entire weapons systems.
What the Chart Shows (for the uneducated)
What the **** are you whining about now, you ignorant buffoon?Cannonpointer » 21 Nov 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The gay homosexual conjobs all insisted that Russia was losing. That *** Zeke went into high dudgeon, clutching his pearls at the very SUGGESTION that Coupkraine would lose.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tell us how the war will end, @Zeets2 we need another laugh at your expense.
This "absorbing losses" has cost NK thousands of troops.MR-7 » 21 Nov 2025, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ As someone who really does not give a **** about the biden/ukraine war, this is my unbiased observation from the news......Russia’s losses in manpower and equipment are catastrophic, undermining its long-term "military strength". Despite the losses, Russia still holds large swaths of Ukraine and continues offensive operations. The war is not a clear win for either side. Ukraine resists fiercely, but Russia’s sheer scale and willingness to absorb losses prevent outright defeat.
It's official. Putin has killed more of his people than Biden killed Americans.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Cannonpointer » 21 Nov 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The gay homosexual conjobs all insisted that Russia was losing. That *** Zeke went into high dudgeon, clutching his pearls at the very SUGGESTION that Coupkraine would lose.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tell us how the war will end, @Zeets2 we need another laugh at your expense.

america should have stayed out of it-- tell ukraine they cant join nato and not give weapons to ukraine.nefarious101 » 22 Nov 2025, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ what was supposed to be one of the world's top military powers is nothing but a meat grinder for it's citizenry
fought to a stand still while only having 1.222 million casualties
what a proud moment hey?!?
jerrab » 22 Nov 2025, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑ america should have stayed out of it-- tell ukraine they cant join nato and not give weapons to ukraine.

jerrab » 22 Nov 2025, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑ america should have stayed out of it-- tell ukraine they cant join nato and not give weapons to ukraine.
So you are saying that instead of 35 countries, as Coupkraine has backing it, Russia has only three? And none of the three has the economic output of a large American city? Whereas Coupkraine has 35, and they have first world economies?MR-7 » 22 Nov 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ Russia’s war effort is sustained by a small but critical group of allies: North Korea (troops), Iran (drones/ammunition), China (industrial support), and Belarus (logistics). Without them, Moscow’s ability to continue large-scale operations would be severely weakened
Reading the Harvey Milk Times makes you look gay. Believing it removes all doubt, Cinderella.MR-7 » 22 Nov 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ ..............Russia has lost more than twice as many troops as Ukraine.
Even if your gay premise were not flamboyantly and homosexually incorrect, Russia has TEN TIMES the troop at its disposal that Coupkraine has. So your math is **** retarded. Two to one losses - though mythical and offered up by a gay man from gay sources - would be perfectly sustainable. If you have 3000 troops and your foe has 300, paying 600 troops to liquidate the enemy would not be "unsustainable," you MSM-aping fruitcake.MR-7 » 22 Nov 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑This imbalance highlights the unsustainable cost of Russia’s attritional strategy, even though it continues to hold territory.
Buying oil is not "industrial support" in the heterosexual community.MR-7 » 22 Nov 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ North Korea (troops), Iran (drones/ammunition), China (industrial support), and Belarus (logistics)...............
BY WHAT RELIABLE SOURCE, you **** moron?
Again, you simple queer: HOW Russia beat 35 countries is not relevant. What counts on the ground is THAT Russia beat the entire CTW (Collective Tranny West). I know it hurts your butt to see trannies lose to real men, but **** you for your weakness, bitch. Find some way to live with it. The trannnies lost. The men won. And bitches like you hate it. Your tears sustain me, you America second trash.
Show me where in the post you are responding to I said that you did, mouth.Zeets2 » 22 Nov 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ What the **** are you whining about now, you ignorant buffoon?
I NEVER claimed that we should spend a nickel defending Ukraine as Biden did with hundreds of billions of our tax dollars.