Liberal Forum

*Roshambo » 27 Nov 2025, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Nov 2025, 6:42 pm

His father "got to him" and he enjoyed it.

         

That explains why I always get the creepy feeling that he is trying to goad me into providing him some "Daddy bathroom time."  
 
 

Cannonpointer » 27 Nov 2025, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Nov 2025, 6:13 pm

Imagine that. An *** speaking to an ***.         

Gee, you're funny!  
Bet you're a riot around the NAMBLA water cooler, huh?  
 

Zeets2 » 28 Nov 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 12:47 pm

Gee, you're funny!  
Bet you're a riot around the NAMBLA water cooler, huh?

Between us, you are the only one whose "news" sources push transgenderism, *** ***.
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Nov 2025, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2025, 3:39 pm

Between us, you are the only one whose "news" sources push transgenderism, *** ***.

I get it, you obviously prefer to remain ignorant on all issues rather than view a multitude of reliable sources as I do, which allow a person to use their own intelligence to discern which reports are believable and which ones are not.  And I've NEVER heard Fox News or Newsmax "push" transgenderism despite reporting a story where it happens to be an issue, like in the Charlie Kirk murder.
And AI disagrees with your idiotic analysis of the two main sources I use for accurate news:

Search Assist


Newsmax has generally been critical of transgender issues, as seen in their pushback against Representative Nancy Mace's anti-trans bathroom claims. They have struggled to find evidence supporting the idea that transgender individuals pose a threat in public restrooms, indicating a more nuanced stance than outright support.

Fox News has primarily focused on covering anti-transgender policies and narratives, particularly during Donald Trump's presidency, often framing these issues in a negative light. The network has been criticized for promoting harmful rhetoric about transgender individuals rather than supporting their rights.

So stay stupid, my friend if you must!  We wouldn't recognize you any other way.
 

Zeets2 » 29 Nov 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2025, 10:34 am

I get it, you obviously prefer to remain ignorant on all issues rather than view a multitude of reliable sources as I do,

I dare you to name one, and thereby prove you are stupid.

Zeets2 » 29 Nov 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2025, 10:34 am

which allow a person to use their own intelligence to discern which reports are believable and which ones are not.  And I've NEVER heard Fox News or Newsmax "push" transgenderism

Google "Bruce Jenner," you **** moron. Fox news pretends he is a broad, you simpleminded mouth breather. That is pushing the tranny narrative HARD, with CONVICTION - and morons like you do not even NOTICE it.You make head roomfor that ****, like mouth breathing jaggovs, to the point where you leap to fox's defense when I say they push the tranny agenda. 

If pretending a dude is a chick is not the trans agenda, you **** fruit, WHAT IS?

Zeets2 » 29 Nov 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

29 Nov 2025, 10:34 am

And AI disagrees with your idiotic analysis of the two main sources I use for accurate news

             

Stay stupid, my friend!  We wouldn't recognize you any other way.
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2025, 1:16 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 1:16 am

I dare you to name one, and thereby prove you are stupid.

Google "Bruce Jenner," you **** moron. Fox news pretends he is a broad, you simpleminded mouth breather. That is pushing the tranny narrative HARD, with CONVICTION - and morons like you do not even NOTICE it.You make head roomfor that ****, like mouth breathing jaggovs, to the point where you leap to fox's defense when I say they push the tranny agenda. 

If pretending a dude is a chick is not the trans agenda, you **** fruit, WHAT IS?

             

Stay stupid, my friend!  We wouldn't recognize you any other way.

I gave you two, dickhead!  Fox News and Newsmax.
Both are widely recognized as providing the most accurate and unbiased news and have held that position for years.
And why do I need to agree with the politics of every person that appears on either network when I have the ability to turn off any program that I don't like?  I've NEVER seen Bruce Jenner on either of those channels, so why the **** would I chase down a video of an idiot like that as you demand?  Doesn't YOUR TV have a channel selector or an off button?  How is it that you prefer to ignore all news programs with such an idiotic appraisal system in your warped brain, since NONE provide the "tranny proof" agenda you insist they must subscribe to?  Is it not a fact that plenty of other Fox News hosts like Jesse Watters, Greg Gutfeld, Jeanine Pirro, Laura Ingraham, and Sean Hannity clearly despise the tranny agenda and do not support it?

It's no wonder why you're so politically ignorant since you can't watch any news program if they don't share your intolerance.  Sounds more to me like you find it difficult to see anything of that perversion because it tugs at your own heartfelt desires that you're desperately attempting to keep hidden. 
Ever read Shakespeare's Hamlet?  Apparently not, or you'd recognize how closely you relate to the quote, "The lady doth protest too much".

So stay in the closet if that's your wish.  Nobody gives a **** about whether that cock you're sucking is attached to a guy or a guy wearing a dress, homo.
 

Zeets2 » 30 Nov 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 11:20 am

I gave you two, dickhead!  Fox News and Newsmax.
Both are widely recognized as providing the most accurate and unbiased news and have held that position for years.
And why do I need to agree with the politics of every person that appears on either network when I have the ability to turn off any program that I don't like?  I've NEVER seen Bruce Jenner on either of those channels, so why the **** would I chase down a video of an idiot like that as you demand?  Doesn't YOUR TV have a channel selector or an off button?  How is it that you prefer to ignore all news programs with such an idiotic appraisal system in your warped brain, since NONE provide the "tranny proof" agenda you insist they must subscribe to?  Is it not a fact that plenty of other Fox News hosts like Jesse Watters, Greg Gutfeld, Jeanine Pirro, Laura Ingraham, and Sean Hannity clearly despise the tranny agenda and do not support it?

It's no wonder why you're so politically ignorant since you can't watch any news program if they don't share your intolerance.  Sounds more to me like you find it difficult to see anything of that perversion because it tugs at your own heartfelt desires that you're desperately attempting to keep hidden. 
Ever read Shakespeare's Hamlet?  Apparently not, or you'd recognize how closely you relate to the quote, "The lady doth protest too much".

So stay in the closet if that's your wish.  Nobody gives a **** about whether that cock you're sucking is attached to a guy or a guy wearing a dress, homo.

Very valid, and I mean valid, questions there Zeets2...  

"And why do I need to agree with the politics of every person that appears on either network when I have the ability to turn off any program that I don't like? Good point
I've NEVER seen Bruce Jenner on either of those channels, so why the **** would I chase down a video of an idiot like that as you demand? Another good point?
Doesn't YOUR TV have a channel selector or an off button? Excellent
How is it that you prefer to ignore all news programs with such an idiotic appraisal system in your warped brain, since NONE provide the "tranny proof" agenda you insist they must subscribe to? I sat down for that one...
Is it not a fact that plenty of other Fox News hosts like Jesse Watters, Greg Gutfeld, Jeanine Pirro, Laura Ingraham, and Sean Hannity clearly despise the tranny agenda and do not support it?" FOX...number one for 23 years
 
 

Zeets2 » 30 Nov 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 11:20 am

I gave you two, dickhead!  Fox News and Newsmax.

You screeched like a girl that fox does not push the tranny agenda - vapidly oblivious to the fact that bruce jenner is a dude.

You are so **** programmed by the transgender media you trust that you entirely FORGOT fox has a man in a dress as a paid contributor. You're innurred to it - you have SIGNED ON to the tranny agenda. It's BACKGROUND noise to you now. You ACCEPT it. You're such a weak piece of ****, boy.

You vomited AI at me, you effeminate queer. Turn about is fair play:

AI

Yes, ******* Jenner (formerly Bruce Jenner) works for Fox News as an on-air contributor, a role she HE took on in March 2022. She HE provides commentary and analysis across various Fox News Media platforms.

You and AI are made for each other, Major Burns. It lies to you, and you lie to the board, spewing the koolaid you drink from tranny media - no longer even BOTHERED by the lies you have come to live with.
 

MR-7 » 30 Nov 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 11:31 am

Very valid, and I mean valid, questions there Zeets2...  

"And why do I need to agree with the politics of every person that appears on either network when I have the ability to turn off any program that I don't like? Good point
I've NEVER seen Bruce Jenner on either of those channels, so why the **** would I chase down a video of an idiot like that as you demand? Another good point?
Doesn't YOUR TV have a channel selector or an off button? Excellent
How is it that you prefer to ignore all news programs with such an idiotic appraisal system in your warped brain, since NONE provide the "tranny proof" agenda you insist they must subscribe to? I sat down for that one...
Is it not a fact that plenty of other Fox News hosts like Jesse Watters, Greg Gutfeld, Jeanine Pirro, Laura Ingraham, and Sean Hannity clearly despise the tranny agenda and do not support it?" FOX...number one for 23 years

Fox news has a man in a dress working for it, and it pretends that man is a woman.

You're good with it. 

You're a weak piece of **** and an enemy of children and your nation. The fact that you can gee gaw and hee haw for how great and number oneish fixed noise is while they noramalize the tranny agenda demonstrates you should not be allowed around children. 

I am reasonably confident that you are never left alone with your grandkids. And that's not an accident. 
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 12:57 pm

Fox news has a man in a dress working for it, and it pretends that man is a woman.

 

This is exactly why they are number one. They are the best company for equal opportunity employment. Kaitlin is doing a great job. TRUMP is the greatest. I voted to protect the kids, and that is exactly what TRUMP has done.

Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 12:57 pm

Fox news has a man in a dress working for it, and it pretends that man is a woman.

You're good with it. 

You're a weak piece of **** and an enemy of children and your nation. The fact that you can gee gaw and hee haw for how great and number oneish fixed noise is while they noramalize the tranny agenda demonstrates you should not be allowed around children. 

I am reasonably confident that you are never left alone with your grandkids. And that's not an accident.

I know I am excited about seeing your responses to Zeets2 questions. The ones that I merely implied were very good ones, and you went into meltdown. Hopefully, you will respond soon and not leave Zeets2 hanging.   
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 12:55 pm

You screeched like a girl that fox does not push the tranny agenda - vapidly oblivious to the fact that bruce jenner is a dude.

You are so **** programmed by the transgender media you trust that you entirely FORGOT fox has a man in a dress as a paid contributor. You're innurred to it - you have SIGNED ON to the tranny agenda. It's BACKGROUND noise to you now. You ACCEPT it. You're such a weak piece of ****, boy.

You vomited AI at me, you effeminate queer. Turn about is fair play:

AI

Yes, ******* Jenner (formerly Bruce Jenner) works for Fox News as an on-air contributor, a role she HE took on in March 2022. She HE provides commentary and analysis across various Fox News Media platforms.

You and AI are made for each other, Major Burns. It lies to you, and you lie to the board, spewing the koolaid you drink from tranny media - no longer even BOTHERED by the lies you have come to live with.

And I repeat, dickhead!  I NEVER SAW Jenner on Fox News, I DON'T CARE about his opinion, and would most likely change the channel if he ever appeared as a guest while I was watching if something he said got me as upset as you obviously get.  So why are YOU so incapable of changing the channel when someone you despise appears on it?  Why do YOU find it SO necessary to limit your viewing to ONLY programming that doesn't offend your ridiculous sensitivities?  Are you afraid that someone will catch you watching any show that has a gay or tranny character on it because you think they'll figure out about your secret life inside that closet?  You're probably shocked to hear that most males unlike you are sufficiently secure in their own masculinity that they can see a gay character without it causing them to get an erection as it probably does to you!

Feel free to go ahead and watch Jenner for all anybody cares!  Believe me, most here have already reached the conclusion that you're a closet homo anyway!    
 

MR-7 » 30 Nov 2025, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 1:21 pm

This is exactly why they are number one. They are the best company for equal opportunity employment. Kaitlin is doing a great job. TRUMP is the greatest. I voted to protect the kids, and that is exactly what TRUMP has done.

It's bruce,you **** leftist queer.

Don't come out of your dick hole pretending you want to protect children, while you cosign the tranny agenda, you weak piece of ****.
 
 
 

MR-7 » 30 Nov 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 1:26 pm

I know I am excited about seeing your responses to Zeets2 questions. The ones that I merely implied were very good ones, and you went into meltdown. Hopefully, you will respond soon and not leave Zeets2 hanging. 

I have a rule, cum guzzler. 

I address the first lie, and I do not even bother to READ the rest of the lies. 

Anyone who wishes me to address their aurgument in toto should refrain from telling any lies - because that is where I stop.

I stop at the first lie. With leftists, with rightists, and with confused tranny *** like yourself. 

Zeets2 » 30 Nov 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 1:36 pm

And I repeat, dickhead!  I NEVER SAW Jenner on Fox News, 

I stop reading at the first lie, homo. 

He is all over that station. He is in its promos, and he is a REGULAR guest on the shows of the people you lie hate trannies.

But let's pretend you did not know, you lying piece of ****. NOW YOU KNOW. So: is fox news tranny media?

Yes/No

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiATj4hT2Ik

Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 2:47 pm

It's bruce,you **** leftist queer.

Don't come out of your dick hole pretending you want to protect children, while you cosign the tranny agenda, you weak piece of ****.

Listen Bitch, I am 98% Macho Man.
 

MR-7 » 30 Nov 2025, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 3:13 pm

Listen Bitch, I am 98% Macho Man.

You are 2% sugar britches.

Which is fiiiine...

Until it comes out that your proclivities run in the africanized american direction.

And ESPECIALLY until you act like a dick sucker by calling bruce kailyn. You weak *** ***. You totally suck *** dick. 
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2025, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 2:49 pm

I have a rule, cum guzzler. 

I address the first lie, and I do not even bother to READ the rest of the lies. 

Anyone who wishes me to address their aurgument in toto should refrain from telling any lies - because that is where I stop.

I stop at the first lie. With leftists, with rightists, and with confused tranny *** like yourself.

I will take Jenner any day over any **** liberal....

Sports stance: Jenner has repeatedly said she believes it’s unfair for transgender girls to compete against cisgender girls in athletics. In 2021, during her run for California governor, she stated: “This is a question of fairness. That’s why I oppose biological boys who are trans competing in girls’ sports in school.”

“Grooming” rhetoric: Jenner has aligned with conservative voices who criticize LGBTQ+ education in schools, often framing it as “indoctrination” or “grooming.” She has used this language in interviews and social media posts to argue against certain school policies.

​​​​​​​Political positioning: These views place Jenner firmly in line with right-leaning cultural debates, despite being a transgender woman herself. She has said her stance is about protecting women’s sports and children, not about rejecting her own identity.
 

MR-7 » 30 Nov 2025, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 3:18 pm

I will take Jenner any day over any **** liberal....
 

Who is "Jenner," you coward? Bruce, or Kaitlyn?

You are CLEARLY embarrassed by your ***, since you won't even say his **** name. 

What we have determined, you **** tranny supporter, is that faux gnews pushes the tranny agenda.
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2025, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2025, 4:05 pm

Who is "Jenner," you coward? Bruce, or Kaitlyn?

You are CLEARLY embarrassed by your ***, since you won't even say his **** name. 

What we have determined, you **** tranny supporter, is that faux gnews pushes the tranny agenda.

Bruce, Kaitlin, Jenner...take your pick. I don't care. Bruce "Kaitlin" Jenner is all about PROTECTING the kids than any liberal could ever be.