Stop it, you're killing me....
So, what do you have?
You didn't get the chain mail?
^Belaboring the obvious...
Cannonpointer » 28 Nov 2025, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑I don't want anyone's citizens murdered by pirates in my name.Huey » 28 Nov 2025, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Not weak at all. It is not like he is droning US citizens, which you and I both spoke out against.
Trumpie-pooh has ordered many acts of war in violation of the Constitution you swore to defend. But you will instead defer to the patriot act or somke other **** and **** the Constitutiton.
The president has no CONSTITUTIONAL right to declare war, as trump did against Iran.
Unfortunately a bi partisan AUMF signed in 2001has changed what an act of war s and who and who is not a civilian. Even American Civilians. Whether you agree with it or not.jerra » wrote:------------------------------------------Huey » 28 Nov 2025, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Since you refuse to answer the question put before yours I gave you an EXAMPLE of an illegal order.
Granny Vapors, another example of an illegal order would be ordering a soldier to shoot a civilian.
civilians-----------------------------------
- a person who is not a member of the armed forces.
ci·vil·ian
/səˈvilyən/
noun
plural noun: civilians
- a person who is not a member of the armed forces.
LMAO! And what is the United Nations doing about drug runners?Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑G'ddammned **** moron...
Today, the concept of "freedom of the seas" can be found in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea under Article 87(1) which states: "the high seas are open to all states, whether coastal or land-locked".
It doesn't matter what I agree with. I never signed an oath and renegged.Huey » 29 Nov 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑
Unfortunately a bi partisan AUMF signed in 2001has changed what an act of war s and who and who is not a civilian. Even American Civilians. Whether you agree with it or not.
The day could very well come when American servicemen, servicewomen, servicetrans and *** could face a rope for their crimes.jerrab » 28 Nov 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ and they were questioning if they have to follow illegal orders that might lead to their execution.............
.------------.One of the lawmakers, Sen. Elissa Slotkin, told The New York Times that she had heard from troops currently serving that they were worried about their own liability in actions such as the ones in the Caribbean.This is not the first time Trump has put members of the military in situations whose legality has been questioned.
United Nations? that's rich...Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑ G'ddammned **** moron...
Today, the concept of "freedom of the seas" can be found in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea under Article 87(1) which states: "the high seas are open to all states, whether coastal or land-locked".
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom