You never spoke one discouraging word about the 20,000 indiscriminate drone attacks that were ordered to go by your Magic Negro....so we rate your out rage about these drug boat strikes..... FAKE.Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ A "rogue" admiral, apparently.
Hegseth Ordered a Lethal Attack but Not the Killing of Survivors, Officials Sayl
Amid talk of war crimes, the details and precise sequence of a Sept. 2 attack on a boat in the Caribbean are facing intensifying scrutiny.
At the White House on Monday, Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary, read a statement that said Mr. Hegseth had authorized the Special Operations commander overseeing the attack, Adm. Frank M. Bradley, “to conduct these kinetic strikes.”
She said that Admiral Bradley had “worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”
under the bus he goes....
The Scumbag Administration.
Who is "we"?*GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Dec 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ You never spoke one discouraging word about the 20,000 indiscriminate drone attacks that were ordered to go by your Magic Negro....so we rate your out rage about these drug boat strikes..... FAKE.
Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ A "rogue" admiral, apparently.
Hegseth Ordered a Lethal Attack but Not the Killing of Survivors, Officials Sayl
Amid talk of war crimes, the details and precise sequence of a Sept. 2 attack on a boat in the Caribbean are facing intensifying scrutiny.
At the White House on Monday, Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary, read a statement that said Mr. Hegseth had authorized the Special Operations commander overseeing the attack, Adm. Frank M. Bradley, “to conduct these kinetic strikes.”
She said that Admiral Bradley had “worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”
under the bus he goes....
The Scumbag Administration.

Great minds think alike. I love that moto.
:rofl:nefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ hegseth is worth 20 million internet dickheads like yourself..
you have no real value....an educated idiot husk of what was supposed to be a man
funny too....you know I'm right
Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑![]()
Remember when his mama called him a scumbag, and then went to Capitol Hill to insist that he is "misunderstood"?
**** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ A "rogue" admiral, apparently.
Hegseth Ordered a Lethal Attack but Not the Killing of Survivors, Officials Sayl
Amid talk of war crimes, the details and precise sequence of a Sept. 2 attack on a boat in the Caribbean are facing intensifying scrutiny.
At the White House on Monday, Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary, read a statement that said Mr. Hegseth had authorized the Special Operations commander overseeing the attack, Adm. Frank M. Bradley, “to conduct these kinetic strikes.”
She said that Admiral Bradley had “worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”
under the bus he goes....
The Scumbag Administration.
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
nefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ Seriously dickhead, that makes you feel like a woman?
that's stupid
Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ A "rogue" admiral, apparently.
Hegseth Ordered a Lethal Attack but Not the Killing of Survivors, Officials Sayl
Amid talk of war crimes, the details and precise sequence of a Sept. 2 attack on a boat in the Caribbean are facing intensifying scrutiny.
At the White House on Monday, Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary, read a statement that said Mr. Hegseth had authorized the Special Operations commander overseeing the attack, Adm. Frank M. Bradley, “to conduct these kinetic strikes.”
She said that Admiral Bradley had “worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”
under the bus he goes....
The Scumbag Administration.
PedoStool,roadkill » 02 Dec 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ 13 dead Americans because Biden is corrupt and incompetent.
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
The near 20 year cluster **** you eagerly enabled is reduced to another slogan.roadkill » 02 Dec 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ 13 dead Americans because Biden is corrupt and incompetent.
Sure, don't worry about the Islamic attacks on US citizens by Islamic Jihadists that Biden invited into the country......get your little nutsack in a tither because Trump blew up some Narco-Terrorists before they could deliver drugs to JonnyBoo and other addicted jackasses that swell the ranks of the Democrat Party.Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ A "rogue" admiral, apparently.
Hegseth Ordered a Lethal Attack but Not the Killing of Survivors, Officials Sayl
Amid talk of war crimes, the details and precise sequence of a Sept. 2 attack on a boat in the Caribbean are facing intensifying scrutiny.
At the White House on Monday, Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary, read a statement that said Mr. Hegseth had authorized the Special Operations commander overseeing the attack, Adm. Frank M. Bradley, “to conduct these kinetic strikes.”
She said that Admiral Bradley had “worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”
under the bus he goes....
The Scumbag Administration.
Stop right there...