Oh, ****.Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ A "rogue" admiral, apparently.
Hegseth Ordered a Lethal Attack but Not the Killing of Survivors, Officials Sayl
Amid talk of war crimes, the details and precise sequence of a Sept. 2 attack on a boat in the Caribbean are facing intensifying scrutiny.
At the White House on Monday, Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary, read a statement that said Mr. Hegseth had authorized the Special Operations commander overseeing the attack, Adm. Frank M. Bradley, “to conduct these kinetic strikes.”
She said that Admiral Bradley had “worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”
under the bus he goes....
The Scumbag Administration.
I piss purple tears for that unadmirable admiral.Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Others are noticing.
Concerns grow that Hegseth, White House aim to scapegoat admiral in deadly boat strike
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... caribbean/
That should further endear the Infotainment Administration to military leadership.
Oh, I could not agree more. His outrage is absolutely selective and disingenuous.*GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Dec 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ You never spoke one discouraging word about the 20,000 indiscriminate drone attacks that were ordered to go by your Magic Negro....so we rate your out rage about these drug boat strikes..... FAKE.
You, he, I, and every honest poster on the board.
I take issue with the claim that beevee is educated.nefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ hegseth is worth 20 million internet dickheads like yourself..
you have no real value....an educated idiot husk of what was supposed to be a man
funny too....you know I'm right
Interesting construction.
It's motto, PedoPhilo.
Tough to stand out in that crowd....but Phil's a plugger...
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ Tough to stand out in that crowd....but Phil's a plugger...
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
I have read that email that his mother wrote, and I say that it as much defends hegseth as damns him.Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑![]()
Remember when his mama called him a scumbag, and then went to Capitol Hill to insist that he is "misunderstood"?
**** idiot.
It's obviously worth your effort to duck it...Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ Did anyone bother to read this?
viewtopic.php?p=2820664#p2820664
is it worth the effort?
This suggests you have yet to read it...
Or diapers...Cannonpointer » 02 Dec 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ I have read that email that his mother wrote, and I say that it asmuch defends hegseth as damns him.
It's basically a rant against infidelity. But the infidelity - serial infidelity - occurred with WOMEN.
It is always refreshing when a republoican sex scandal doesn't involve school boys or highway rest stops.
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ The near 20 year cluster **** you eagerly enabled is reduced to another slogan.
Stay stupid, RoadStool.
What is the name of this "narco-terrorist" organization?RebelGator » 02 Dec 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ Sure, don't worry about the Islamic attacks on US citizens by Islamic Jihadists that Biden invited into the country......get your little nutsack in a tither because Trump blew up some Narco-Terrorists before they could deliver drugs to JonnyBoo and other addicted jackasses that swell the ranks of the Democrat Party.
I can testify.Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Stop right there...
Can't possibly be anything worth reading.
It's an add on with my latest Gaydar update...
Yer not gonna start crying are you? I mean you been throwing tantrums since 2016.
Not if you're infotained.Cannonpointer » 02 Dec 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ What is the name of this "narco-terrorist" organization?
Is it on the list of terrorist organizations? How many countries list this organization as terrorist?
Do you just mouth **** and **** about things of which you are entirely ignorant?
When your country's military is blowing civilians up, you should be more alarmed than vapid and smug, you ****.