Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
What's A Hegseth Worth?
What's A Hegseth Worth?
By Blackvegetable
2 Dec 2025 8:10 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
2 Dec 2025 10:49 am
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Dec 2025 10:52 am
2 Dec 2025 10:59 am
Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ I bet this
#41
isn't worth reading.
Prove me wrong...
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Dec 2025 11:42 am
"Hang Mike Pence!"roadkill » 02 Dec 2025, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ Yer not gonna start crying are you? I mean you been throwing tantrums since 2016.
2 Dec 2025 11:55 am
Precedent has already been established.Cannonpointer » 02 Dec 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, I could not agree more. His outrage is absolutely selective and disingenuous.
Mine isn't. I hope they burn hegseth down.
I don't think there is any way to put the Genie back in the bottle.
2 Dec 2025 12:05 pm
To put this crap in context -Cannonpointer » 02 Dec 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, I could not agree more. His outrage is absolutely selective and disingenuous.
Mine isn't. I hope they burn hegseth down.
I arrived in August, 2017...
2 Dec 2025 12:19 pm
Nobody here believes that is when you first started spending your life at political forums and nobody believes you were ever openly critical of anything that Obama / Holder ever did while they were playing fast and loose with human lives.Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ To put this crap in context -
I arrived in August, 2017...
2 Dec 2025 12:21 pm
About the same time that you were hailing your groomer as "harsh, but tender"....*GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Dec 2025, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody here believes that is when you first started spending your life at political forums and nobody believes you were ever openly critical of anything that Obama / Holder ever did while they were playing fast and loose with human lives.
Everyone saw it.
2 Dec 2025 12:22 pm
The new hoax war crimes war crimes war crimesBlackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Others are noticing.
Concerns grow that Hegseth, White House aim to scapegoat admiral in deadly boat strike
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... caribbean/
That should further endear the Infotainment Administration to military leadership.
2 Dec 2025 12:27 pm
Keep averting your eyes, Usefool.
Besides, what's a few war crimes between rapists, eh?
2 Dec 2025 12:29 pm
You still thing Pence is relevant?
2 Dec 2025 12:30 pm
It remains a historical fact, RoadStool....
2 Dec 2025 12:43 pm
What? That Pence is a RINO?
I'd worry more about Biden/Harris if I were you...but I'm not a redneck Nazi like you. PhDs said they are officially the worst.
And tests show that you were one of their turds.
2 Dec 2025 12:46 pm
yep...scare the rank and file military into becoming too paranoid about this hoax that they are afraid to do their jobs.
this hoax is designed to do just that....they intend to disrupt the chain of command
2 Dec 2025 12:46 pm
PedoGibberish.roadkill » 02 Dec 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ What? That Pence is a RINO?
I'd worry more about Biden/Harris if I were you...but I'm not a redneck Nazi like you. PhDs said they are officially the worst.
And tests show that you were one of their turds.
2 Dec 2025 12:52 pm
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Dec 2025 1:09 pm
anyone hear about reports of some members of the seditious 6 are involved in Mexican child sex trafficking ring?
that sounds serious....guess the big guns are coming out firing
that sounds serious....guess the big guns are coming out firing
2 Dec 2025 1:53 pm
Bukkake Obama ordered around 550 drone strikes killing so-called enemies of America...
any questions about that?
any questions about that?
2 Dec 2025 2:12 pm
Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep averting your eyes, Usefool.
Besides, what's a few war crimes between rapists, eh?
hey I think my company commander just gave us an illegal order
2 Dec 2025 2:13 pm
good ole Barrynefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Bukkake Obama ordered around 550 drone strikes killing so-called enemies of America...
any questions about that?
Who is online
In total there are 2363 users online :: 15 registered, 17 bots, and 2331 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, MR-7, jerra b, PhiloBeddo, Toddster Patriot, Cannonpointer, Jan Sixer, nefarious101, springfield xd, Fuelman
Bots: DuckDuckBot, Yahoo! Slurp, Firefox/7.0, CriteoBot, Mediatoolkitbot, facebookexternalhit, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, proximic, YandexBot, Googlebot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, linkfluence.com, curl/7, Applebot, GPTBot