Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
trump and hegsmith will have to explain how 2 people clinging to a boat is a threat to national security.
trump and hegsmith will have to explain how 2 people clinging to a boat is a threat to national security.
By jerra b
2 Dec 2025 1:14 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
2 Dec 2025 2:13 pm
can you explain that and how you could support it?...dickhead!
2 Dec 2025 2:15 pm
they are desperate
2 Dec 2025 2:16 pm
hey dickhead....you are always the cry baby...grandma's boy
2 Dec 2025 2:20 pm
nefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ get it yourself....are you too stupid to do a search Low IQ 3rd worlder
show proof or SHUT THE **** UP.
https://katu.com/news/nation-world/vanc ... s-behavior
2 Dec 2025 2:22 pm
2 Dec 2025 2:30 pm
jerrab » 02 Dec 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ show proof or SHUT THE **** UP.
https://katu.com/news/nation-world/vanc ... s-behavior
you don't know how to do an internet search?....what are you Somali? ...or Sudanese?
**** low IQ inbred 3rd worlder
2 Dec 2025 2:35 pm
I think she's Turkish Kurd, she first came on the scene at dot net when they were getting gassed.nefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ you don't know how to do an internet search?....what are you Somali? ...or Sudanese?
**** low IQ inbred 3rd worlder
2 Dec 2025 2:39 pm
RebelGator » 02 Dec 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ I think she's Turkish Kurd, she first came on the scene at dot net when they were getting gassed.
That explains a lot....thanks
2 Dec 2025 2:42 pm
I could be wrong though, maybe it's Kurkish Turd....whatever, its all the same.
2 Dec 2025 2:48 pm
RebelGator » 02 Dec 2025, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I could be wrong though, maybe it's Kurkish Turd....whatever, its all the same.
she must be used to people agreeing with her.
I made a russia russia russia type "accusation"...she didn't know how to handle it
2 Dec 2025 2:57 pm
nope I include links and dont expect others to confirm what I know.nefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ you don't know how to do an internet search?....what are you Somali? ...or Sudanese?
**** low IQ inbred 3rd worlder
and I searched and found nothing which proves you are a liar................ and desperate.
-----------------------------The human rights situation deteriorated in Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, as the regional and central governments further dismantled Hong Kong’s political freedoms and autonomy during the year.Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary arrest and detention; transnational repression against individuals outside of Hong Kong; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including unjustified arrests or prosecutions of journalists and censorship; trafficking in persons; and significant restrictions on workers’ freedom of association, including coercive actions against independent trade unions and arrests of labor activists.The government took few credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses.Section 1.Lifea. Extrajudicial KillingsThere were no reports the Special Administrative Region (SAR) government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings during the year.b.
2 Dec 2025 3:00 pm
nefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ you don't know how to do an internet search?....what are you Somali? ...or Sudanese?
**** low IQ inbred 3rd worlder
rkelly
-------------------------American R&B singer R. Kelly has faced repeated accusations of sexual abuse for incidents dating from 1991 to 2018 and has been the subject of a long-term investigation by the Chicago Sun-Times since August 2000. He has been tried in multiple civil suits and criminal trials, starting in 1996 and culminating in a 2021 conviction for violations of the Mann Act and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and a 2022 conviction for production of child pornography. Defenders of Kelly maintained that he was merely a "playboy" and a "sex symbol".[1] Judge Ann Donnelly, who presided over Kelly's 2021 trial, summarized Kelly's actions as having "[used] his fame and organization to lure young people into abusive sexual relationships—a racketeering enterprise that the government alleged spanned about 25 years."[2]Following leaked video recordings, Kelly was prosecute
2 Dec 2025 3:02 pm
desperate person number 2RebelGator » 02 Dec 2025, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I could be wrong though, maybe it's Kurkish Turd....whatever, its all the same.
hegsmith is going dowwwwn and maybe trump as well.
2 Dec 2025 3:08 pm
You're confused again....rKelly is a low-level, NHB poster who has never been accused of any man act.jerrab » 02 Dec 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ rkelly
-------------------------American R&B singer R. Kelly has faced repeated accusations of sexual abuse for incidents dating from 1991 to 2018 and has been the subject of a long-term investigation by the Chicago Sun-Times since August 2000. He has been tried in multiple civil suits and criminal trials, starting in 1996 and culminating in a 2021 conviction for violations of the Mann Act and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and a 2022 conviction for production of child pornography. Defenders of Kelly maintained that he was merely a "playboy" and a "sex symbol".[1] Judge Ann Donnelly, who presided over Kelly's 2021 trial, summarized Kelly's actions as having "[used] his fame and organization to lure young people into abusive sexual relationships—a racketeering enterprise that the government alleged spanned about 25 years."[2]Following leaked video recordings, Kelly was prosecute
2 Dec 2025 3:12 pm
jerrab » 02 Dec 2025, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ nope I include links and dont expect others to confirm what I know.
and I searched and found nothing which proves you are a liar................ and desperate.
-----------------------------The human rights situation deteriorated in Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, as the regional and central governments further dismantled Hong Kong’s political freedoms and autonomy during the year.Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary arrest and detention; transnational repression against individuals outside of Hong Kong; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including unjustified arrests or prosecutions of journalists and censorship; trafficking in persons; and significant restrictions on workers’ freedom of association, including coercive actions against independent trade unions and arrests of labor activists.The government took few credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses.Section 1.Lifea. Extrajudicial KillingsThere were no reports the Special Administrative Region (SAR) government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings during the year.b.
Why would I be desperate?
we have the presidency
the house
the senate
Scotus
the military
law enforcement
In a red state
and the American people behind us
MAGA is your future....you being a low IQ 3rd worlder it would be to your advantage to understand that
2 Dec 2025 3:35 pm
-------------------------------------nefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would I be desperate?
we have the presidency
the house
the senate
Scotus
the military
law enforcement
In a red state
and the American people behind us
MAGA is your future....you being a low IQ 3rd worlder it would be to your advantage to understand that
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/202 ... zuela.html
The question of the day seems to be whether Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is a war criminal. It’s a complicated question, in that the civilian Venezuelan boat crews that he ordered be killed were not at war with the United States. So, the real question is whether he’s a criminal, plain and simple.Hegseth himself probably finds the question absurd because, as he has stated many times, he rejects the very concept of “war crimes,” viewing the killing of suspected bad guys in combat as justified, even laudable, whatever military lawyers might say.Now that he’s seen as playing a role in actual killings, not merely defending others accused of murder on the battlefield, President Donald Trump must decide whether he shares Hegseth’s insouciance. If he doesn’t share his cavalier views on the subject, Trump needs to fire him. If he doesn’t fire him, Trump in effect tells the world—including the 2 million service members of the U.S. armed forces—that he too is indifferent to the laws of war, sending a message that they can be indifferent as well.Trump’s choice—canning Hegseth or letting him stay on—could affect civilian–military relations for decades to come, demoralizing countless officers and enlisted personnel while emboldening others to violate a variety of their oaths.
2 Dec 2025 3:38 pm
nefarious101 » 02 Dec 2025, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would I be desperate?
we have the presidency
the house
the senate
Scotus
the military
law enforcement
In a red state
and the American people behind us
MAGA is your future....you being a low IQ 3rd worlder it would be to your advantage to understand that
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your ... ar-crimes/
2 Dec 2025 3:39 pm
jerrab » 02 Dec 2025, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑ -------------------------------------
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/202 ... zuela.html
The question of the day seems to be whether Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is a war criminal. It’s a complicated question, in that the civilian Venezuelan boat crews that he ordered be killed were not at war with the United States. So, the real question is whether he’s a criminal, plain and simple.Hegseth himself probably finds the question absurd because, as he has stated many times, he rejects the very concept of “war crimes,” viewing the killing of suspected bad guys in combat as justified, even laudable, whatever military lawyers might say.Now that he’s seen as playing a role in actual killings, not merely defending others accused of murder on the battlefield, President Donald Trump must decide whether he shares Hegseth’s insouciance. If he doesn’t share his cavalier views on the subject, Trump needs to fire him. If he doesn’t fire him, Trump in effect tells the world—including the 2 million service members of the U.S. armed forces—that he too is indifferent to the laws of war, sending a message that they can be indifferent as well.Trump’s choice—canning Hegseth or letting him stay on—could affect civilian–military relations for decades to come, demoralizing countless officers and enlisted personnel while emboldening others to violate a variety of their oaths.
that's a battle you already lost....the hoax fell apart already
2 Dec 2025 3:40 pm
Stupid corrupt Dems defending drug smugglers. WTF. Blow the drug dealing mother **** out of the water. I sleep just fine doing that.
2 Dec 2025 3:41 pm
look who's really the desperate one
Who is online
In total there are 4611 users online :: 18 registered, 15 bots, and 4578 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buffalo, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, MR-7, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Huey, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: Firefox/7.0, facebookexternalhit, NING, ADmantX, Yahoo! Slurp, Mediapartners-Google, proximic, CriteoBot, Kinza, YandexBot, bingbot, Applebot, Baiduspider, curl/7, Googlebot