
nefarious101 » 03 Dec 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ Dribbles shows us how to be triggered without trying to look like you're triggered
didn't work....
Cha-Ching!

nefarious101 » 03 Dec 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ Dribbles isn't in control of Dribbles...he can't help himself
Cha-Ching
Winning was never so easy
come on Dribbles...give me another WIN!
Excellent point!DeezerShoove » 02 Dec 2025, 11:16 pm » wrote: ↑ How about this:
If you make/are dependent on government money for more than 50% of your income, you cannot vote.
The only exceptions are non-commissioned military and law enforcement below lieutenant.

RebelGator » 02 Dec 2025, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑ The fact a ghetto booger on welfare has the same vote as a rancher or farmer that feeds the country is a damn shame.
Case in point is the congressional race in Tennessee where the Democrat Communist got 86% of the vote in Nashville. Thank God the rest of the District turned out in numbers to defeat the slut, masquerading as a white woman.
The fact it was close should raise alarm bells for decent, property owning, tax paying Americans. We need a merit based form of electing the people who govern us, or we'll eventually have a government that mimics the movie, Idiocracy.
How do we defend rural USA from the SECTION APE HOUSING PROGRAM...?Agreed. Probably slipped my mind because Social Security is money you've already earned.Zeets2 » 03 Dec 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ Excellent point!
But I'd lower that level of dependency to 25% of government benefits as the limit while also excepting Social Security recipients who have earned their right to vote with their life-long labor.
RebelGator » 03 Dec 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ I think a simpler qualifier would be filing an income tax form and paying a property tax bill.