Liberal Forum

*Roshambo » 04 Dec 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 8:12 am

Quiet. Quiet, piggy 

Either put up video proof of the following or please stop with your time wasting misdirection and evasive tactics that fool nobody. 

The [[[MSM]]] claim is 140 Capitol Cops were injured badly enough to require emergency medical treatment.
The [[[MSM]]] claimed it was a violent and bloody insurrection...if so then surely there were several Capitol Cops who were laying unconscious...if so there must have been several badly beaten cops lying in pools of their own blood....   
There were 100s of campus security cameras and 1000s of cell phone  cameras everywhere, so let's see you produce some videos that show scores of severely beaten cops getting carried off on stretchers to scores of ambulances.
Just post what you consider were  the top ten so we can finally get a glimpse of what "THE WORST ATTACK ON US SOIL SINCE PEARL HARBOR looks like..... 

 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 8:23 am

Either put up video proof of the following or please stop with your time wasting misdirection and evasive tactics that fool nobody. 

The [[[MSM]]] claim is 140 Capitol Cops were injured badly enough to require emergency medical treatment.
The [[[MSM]]] claimed it was a violent and bloody insurrection...if so then surely there were several Capitol Cops who were laying unconscious...if so there must have been several badly beaten cops lying in pools of their own blood....   
There were 100s of campus security cameras and 1000s of cell phone  cameras everywhere, so let's see you produce some videos that show scores of severely beaten cops getting carried off on stretchers to scores of ambulances.
Just post what you consider were  the top ten so we can finally get a glimpse of what "THE WORST ATTACK ON US SOIL SINCE PEARL HARBOR looks like..... 

Quiet. Quiet, piggy 
         
 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 7:18 am

Hegseth, citing ‘fog of war,’ says he learned of survivors hours after strike

..........

During public hearings, former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Ornato relayed a story about President Trump becoming irate in the presidential SUV (the "Beast") when told he could not go to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and that Trump had allegedly lunged for the steering wheel. In his subsequent closed-door testimony, which was released later,

Ornato stated he was "shocked" by Hutchinson's televised account and did not recall the specific conversation she described. When pressed for details about the events of that day, he attributed his inability to remember certain specifics to the chaotic nature of the day, describing it as a "very chaotic day, so I don't recall those specific details" and later using the term "fog of war". 

Picture these MAGAt idiots in a REAL war...

Pete would not hesitate to destroy Noah's Ark.
 

*Roshambo » 04 Dec 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 8:23 am

       

I do not accept your cowardly surrender.,,

but it sure has been my great pleasure to watch you make yourself look like a [[[MSM]]] brainwashed rube..  
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2025, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 8:27 am

I do not accept your cowardly surrender.,,

but it sure has been my great pleasure to watch you make yourself look like a [[[MSM]]] brainwashed rube..

Bow down and kiss the ring.
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2025, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 7:17 am

To inhale...

Oh yes we are all breathing if not you know what that means 

BuckNaked » 04 Dec 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 10:49 am

Oh yes we are all breathing if not you know what that means

Hence my recommendation 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 11:04 am

Hence my recommendation

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 11:04 am

Hence my recommendation

what’s your recommendation?

Buck Naked » 04 Dec 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 2:11 pm

what’s your recommendation?

His recommendation is to trust him completely for everything there is to know about reality and never worry about actual evolving in plain sight again.

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 6:20 pm

This is ****.

And you're a **** rube.

She testified to being party to a conversation with Meadows and Ornato in which the latter described those events.

This is why Ornato was called back to testify.

Slack jawed imbecile.

SOMEONE is being slack jawed...
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 7:18 am

Hegseth, citing ‘fog of war,’ says he learned of survivors hours after strike

..........

During public hearings, former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Ornato relayed a story about President Trump becoming irate in the presidential SUV (the "Beast") when told he could not go to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and that Trump had allegedly lunged for the steering wheel. In his subsequent closed-door testimony, which was released later,

Ornato stated he was "shocked" by Hutchinson's televised account and did not recall the specific conversation she described. When pressed for details about the events of that day, he attributed his inability to remember certain specifics to the chaotic nature of the day, describing it as a "very chaotic day, so I don't recall those specific details" and later using the term "fog of war". 

Picture these MAGAt idiots in a REAL war...

Hegseth, citing ‘fog of war,’ says he learned of survivors hours after strike

Another failed narrative.

for the record, Moron, that is not what the fog of war referred to.

i used to think you were just trolling and baiting people because you are a lonely old man pushing 70 who has no life,

Now I just think you are a **** clapping seal dumb ****.

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 6:59 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 6:59 pm

By now you should have figured out who's lying...

And there's the stioky wicket. 

The boy who cried wolf was disbelieved when a real wolf appeared. 

The reason MAGA looks past brazen trump criminality is that they have already done due diligence - or have seen other credible people do it, the lazy **** - on so many FALSE claims against trump that any real ones get a reflexive eye roll.

And whereas you look askance at their credulity, you suffer in silence and blythe indifference the credulity of people who believe he praised white supremacy and sucked Putin's balls. Credulity is credulity, but only the credulity of the right rankles you.

For that matter, you have vouchsafed that God Almighty Himself misfiles female souls into male bodies - an articale of faith for which there is neither science nor religion to sustain. So who are YOU to scoff at credulity?
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 7:20 pm

To what, Rog?

Specifically....

To the fact that the right has TDF - Trump Derangement Fatigue. 

Your TDS and their TDF exacerbate each other in an endless loop.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2025, 11:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 11:16 pm

 Millions of easily terrified snowflakes like BV  believe with all their heart that J6 was the worst attack on US soil since Pearl Harbor     ...
Our FBI and SS were part of the False Flag....the federal agent who planted the pipe bomb was positively ID'd....yet BV places great faith in their sworn testimony...

His credulity knows no bounds. Even children are not safe from it. Hence his member title. 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2025, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 11:22 pm

I don't think we should drone strike drug  factories  in Mexico.

Out in the Gulf....very little chance of hitting any friendlies.

If you're aiming at them, there is an excellent chance. 

Who SAID they were drug runners? Who made them legitimate targets?

Do you want YOUR family to be able toply the carrib without fear of an actual MILITARY ATTACK?

What defense does a civilian craft have against amilitary assault? They could not have arrested them instead of murdering them?

What else are you willing to countenance IN YOUR NAME, on the word of your precious, believable federal nanny state? 
 

*Roshambo » 04 Dec 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 7:29 am

I am uncertain about the subject you are referring to. Please focus on your own matters.

If you cannot follow the thread, that IS a matter for my focus. 

I'm the guy who has to clean up after you morons. It's good to keep trackof who's who. 
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2025, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 7:39 am

Talk about face **** your own argument. 

Who called it "war"?

Gritty's flunky.

I trust you to finger a face **** at five furlongs, you fat, filthy, fish-faced fact-foreswearing fukaluk.

 
 

*Roshambo » 04 Dec 2025, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 7:30 am

Please focus on your own matters.

I will focus upon whatever I please on this board, you slack-jawed, child-disturbing jackwagon. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2025, 10:33 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2025, 10:33 pm

If you're aiming at them, there is an excellent chance. 

Who SAID they were drug runners? Who made them legitimate targets?

Do you want YOUR family to be able toply the carrib without fear of an actual MILITARY ATTACK?

What defense does a civilian craft have against amilitary assault? They could not have arrested them instead of murdering them?

What else are you willing to countenance IN YOUR NAME, on the word of your precious, believable federal nanny state?

I think the surveillance begins well before the boat gets loaded and while the boat gets loaded. 
Just a guess.
I personally would love to see every Liberal  hard drug user die a quick death from an overdose of cheap and plentiful heroin or fentanyl...but I respect those who feel that getting rid of as much incoming dope as possible is the best thing for one and all.