Liberal Forum

*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Dec 2025, 2:07 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 2:07 am

[url= postimages /][/url]
I think the surveillance begins well before the boat gets loaded and while the boat gets loaded. 
Just a guess.
I personally would love to see every Liberal  hard drug user die a quick death from an overdose of cheap and plentiful heroin or fentanyl...but I respect those who feel that getting rid of as much incoming dope as possible is the best thing for one and all.

Won't be long.. The Gubomint will be blowing up Nazi's in their Mom's basement.

Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2025, 10:17 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 10:17 pm

I can vouch for this.

You call him High Tech, same as the rest of us do.

"High Tech"...  
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 7:20 pm

To what, Rog?

yet your blatant stupidity blinds you...*sighs*
 
Keep running...

ROG62 » 05 Dec 2025, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 7:15 am

yet your blatant stupidity blinds you...*sighs*
 
Keep running...

QED...

You run from EVERYTHING..


 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Dec 2025, 2:07 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 2:07 am

I think the surveillance begins well before the boat gets loaded and while the boat gets loaded. 
Just a guess.

That's not a guess. It's a statement of faith.

We don't want our military blasting civilians out of the water. It's not a good look. And if they come BACK around to kill survivors, it's a crime against humanity under international laws that WE CREATED and towhich WE ARE SIGNATORY.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Dec 2025, 2:07 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 2:07 am

I personally would love to see every Liberal  hard drug user die a quick death from an overdose of cheap and plentiful heroin or fentanyl...but I respect those who feel that getting rid of as much incoming dope as possible is the best thing for one and all.

This has nothing to do with "getting rid of as much incoming dope as possible." The carribean off Venezuela is not a major supply route. The major supply routes come out of Mexico - where we ARMED THE CARTELS when the Mexican government had them on the ropes.

Drug interdiction never has been a motive for government action. When the pigs in your town hold up some mutt as a trophy in the war on drugs, that mutt was competing with the guys who have the stamp. He wasn't busted for drug dealing. He was busted for competing with the guys who pay the cops.

Cannonpointer » 05 Dec 2025, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 9:12 pm

That's not a guess. It's a statement of faith.

We don't want our military blasting civilians out of the water. It's not a good look. And if they come BACK around to kill survivors, it's a crime against humanity under international laws that WE CREATED and towhich WE ARE SIGNATORY.

This has nothing to do with "getting rid of as much incoming dope as possible." The carribean off Venezuela is not a major supply route. The major supply routes come out of Mexico - where we ARMED THE CARTELS when the Mexican government had them on the ropes.

Drug interdiction never has been a motive for government action. When the pigs in your town hold up some mutt as a trophy in the war on drugs, that mutt was competing with the guys who have the stamp. He wasn't busted for drug dealing. He was busted for competing with the guys who pay the cops.

When you are sweeping your floor...do you skip past the small patches of dirt that are the easiest to reach because you know where there's more dirt in the next room...?
The "safest" target with the lowest chance of killing innocent people is right out in the open water.
How on Earth do we do a full military style raid of a dope factory  in the middle of a Mexican neighborhood..?
We don't.
Like I said a few posts ago...the Genie is already out of the bottle as far as the President's emergency powers is concerned.
You should forward your posts to your Congressmen.    

 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 06 Dec 2025, 12:07 am » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2025, 12:07 am

When you are sweeping your floor...do you skip past the small patches of dirt that are the easiest to reach because you know where there's more dirt in the next room...?
The "safest" target with the lowest chance of killing innocent people is right out in the open water.
How on Earth do we do a full military style raid of a dope factory  in the middle of a Mexican neighborhood..?
We don't.
Like I said a few posts ago...the Genie is already out of the bottle as far as the President's emergency powers is concerned.
You should forward your posts to your Congressmen.  

You are good with the Constitution and international law being flouted,so your posts should stay right where they are.

We wouldn't have toblow up any neighborhoods to stop the meskin cartels. The deep state runs them. It created them. 
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Dec 2025, 9:56 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2025, 9:56 pm

You are good with the Constitution and international law being flouted,so your posts should stay right where they are.

We wouldn't have toblow up any neighborhoods to stop the meskin cartels. The deep state runs them. It created them.

So you want to abolish the whole "Commander in Chief" thing and conduct 100% of our military business by committee...?
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 7:18 am

Hegseth, citing ‘fog of war,’ says he learned of survivors hours after strike

..........

During public hearings, former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Ornato relayed a story about President Trump becoming irate in the presidential SUV (the "Beast") when told he could not go to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and that Trump had allegedly lunged for the steering wheel. In his subsequent closed-door testimony, which was released later,

Ornato stated he was "shocked" by Hutchinson's televised account and did not recall the specific conversation she described. When pressed for details about the events of that day, he attributed his inability to remember certain specifics to the chaotic nature of the day, describing it as a "very chaotic day, so I don't recall those specific details" and later using the term "fog of war". 

Picture these MAGAt idiots in a REAL war...

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxILgG1en_n8 ... nKLWE67V_-

Blackvegetable » 07 Dec 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2025, 12:36 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2025, 7:18 am

Hegseth, citing ‘fog of war,’ says he learned of survivors hours after strike

..........

During public hearings, former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Ornato relayed a story about President Trump becoming irate in the presidential SUV (the "Beast") when told he could not go to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and that Trump had allegedly lunged for the steering wheel. In his subsequent closed-door testimony, which was released later,

Ornato stated he was "shocked" by Hutchinson's televised account and did not recall the specific conversation she described. When pressed for details about the events of that day, he attributed his inability to remember certain specifics to the chaotic nature of the day, describing it as a "very chaotic day, so I don't recall those specific details" and later using the term "fog of war". 

Picture these MAGAt idiots in a REAL war...

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxILgG1en_n8 ... nKLWE67V_-

 

He attributed the fog of war for not being able to see any survivors after the initial strike.  

Don't bother us again with this BS until you have the proof he personally ordered the 2nd strike.

Cannonpointer » 06 Dec 2025, 9:56 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2025, 9:56 pm

You are good with the Constitution and international law being flouted,so your posts should stay right where they are.

We wouldn't have toblow up any neighborhoods to stop the meskin cartels. The deep state runs them. It created them. 
 

State of mind or people minding a stated social consensus throughout history of generation gaps practicing the same ideas over and over thinking life evolves 7 days a week instead of adapting to the moment here.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Dec 2025, 12:03 am » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2025, 12:03 am

So you want to abolish the whole "Commander in Chief" thing and conduct 100% of our military business by committee...?

I want to conduct it Constitutionally. 

I want a president who does not start wars. You know - a "peace" president instead of just another neocon like hillary or biden or barraky kaki. 

Cannonpointer » 05 Dec 2025, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2025, 9:12 pm

That's not a guess. It's a statement of faith.

We don't want our military blasting civilians out of the water. It's not a good look. And if they come BACK around to kill survivors, it's a crime against humanity under international laws that WE CREATED and towhich WE ARE SIGNATORY.

This has nothing to do with "getting rid of as much incoming dope as possible." The carribean off Venezuela is not a major supply route. The major supply routes come out of Mexico - where we ARMED THE CARTELS when the Mexican government had them on the ropes.

Drug interdiction never has been a motive for government action. When the pigs in your town hold up some mutt as a trophy in the war on drugs, that mutt was competing with the guys who have the stamp. He wasn't busted for drug dealing. He was busted for competing with the guys who pay the cops.

Every reality of humanity is a staged belief life isn't self evident time personally evolving one of a kind, daily alive now. Intellectual souls are declared larger than instinctive soles by every community honoring church and state mentalities building economic tomorrows governing each great great grandchild delivered at birth daily here.

Humanity protects ancestral beliefs, while an ancestor's brain defends their time alive each rotation lived since conception. What is that magical missing link in every reality between 5 ancestral lineages and each generation gap daily here?

Reasonable doubt teaming with self deception practiced every generation since dawn of civilization, every day on a calendar measuring human behavior each rotation total sum results happened, happening, details haven't arrived yet.