Looks like we'll have to wait for BV's head to reload with **** before he'll be able to think of something else to say.......
why? you afraid of being outdone? don't fret, you've got the market cornered...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom This won't take long...ROG62 » 03 Dec 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ brown..."as told"? keep reaching...but know this, tiny feet...you'll never make it to the adult table...
You just repeat the same ******* ****, over and over.*GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Looks like we'll have to wait for BV's head to reload with **** before he'll be able to think of something else to say.......
Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ You just repeat the same ******* ****, over and over.
Back to Ornato's choice of words, Quimmie....*GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ Yes it is a war against drugs being brought into the USA by the ton.
You no doubt grieve for the drug cartel.
Tell us about what war is like PX RAMBO.......Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ You just repeat the same ******* ****, over and over.

E) All the above only deal with living cradle to grave as an adult after birth while living one at a time as a specific life's actual position equally adapting in space since conceived.Buck Naked » 03 Dec 2025, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Take it up with Ornato.*GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Tell us about what war is like PX RAMBO.......![]()
In your effeminately raised ****** bitch mind J6 was the worst attack on US soil since Pearl Harbor......
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Tell us about what war is like PX RAMBO.......


Why don't you take your beating and slink off?*GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2025, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ Tell us about what war is like PX RAMBO.......![]()
In your effeminately raised ****** bitch mind J6 was the worst attack on US soil since Pearl Harbor......![]()
Now go have yourself a good cry you Illegal Alien loving POS traitor......![]()
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
BV's such a battle hardened commando..... he thinks unarmed MAGA came within inches of dragging VP Pence to his death past 100s of well armed Capitol Security Cops.......to a pick up truck that was parked 1000 feet away off campus
*GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ BV's such a battle hardened commando..... he thinks unarmed MAGA came within inches of dragging VP Pence to his death past 100s of well armed Capitol Security Cops.......to a pick up truck that was parked 1000 feet away off campus
Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑ again, that what the Secret Service THERE said...
Which you would know, were you not too sissy to watch.
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Figure it out using the definition I provided.
If you can't recall, ask @Vegas to post it for you.
It's the least he can do.
Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ Hegseth, citing ‘fog of war,’ says he learned of survivors hours after strike
..........
During public hearings, former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Ornato relayed a story about President Trump becoming irate in the presidential SUV (the "Beast") when told he could not go to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and that Trump had allegedly lunged for the steering wheel. In his subsequent closed-door testimony, which was released later,
Ornato stated he was "shocked" by Hutchinson's televised account and did not recall the specific conversation she described. When pressed for details about the events of that day, he attributed his inability to remember certain specifics to the chaotic nature of the day, describing it as a "very chaotic day, so I don't recall those specific details" and later using the term "fog of war".
Picture these MAGAt idiots in a REAL war...
You speaking of the warrior ethos makes me laugh."Warrior Ethos" -
the definition I provided
I answered the question I’m all set