
It's the jooz...nefarious101 » 03 Dec 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ How do banks get around regulations to lend money to less than favorable clients?
and....
Is that bad?
The Fed and the Bank of England seem to think so...
Good thing no one ever get's into trouble other than whistleblowers who point this **** out...or it would stop
the banks are leaking...start bailing again
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The banks know that the government will always bail them out, so it doesn't matter. They will lend to homeless people if it meant at least one payment of interest.nefarious101 » 03 Dec 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ How do banks get around regulations to lend money to less than favorable clients?
and....
Is that bad?
The Fed and the Bank of England seem to think so...
Good thing no one ever get's into trouble other than whistleblowers who point this **** out...or it would stop
the banks are leaking...start bailing again
Naffy,nefarious101 » 03 Dec 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ How do banks get around regulations to lend money to less than favorable clients?
and....
Is that bad?
The Fed and the Bank of England seem to think so...
Good thing no one ever get's into trouble other than whistleblowers who point this **** out...or it would stop
the banks are leaking...start bailing again

Vegas » 03 Dec 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ The banks know that the government will always bail them out, so it doesn't matter. They will lend to homeless people if it meant at least one payment of interest.

Under Democrat administration's, banks were mandated to make loans to minorities.nefarious101 » 03 Dec 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ How do banks get around regulations to lend money to less than favorable clients?
and....
Is that bad?
The Fed and the Bank of England seem to think so...
Good thing no one ever get's into trouble other than whistleblowers who point this **** out...or it would stop
the banks are leaking...start bailing again
RebelGator » 03 Dec 2025, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Under Democrat administration's, banks were mandated to make loans to minorities.

sons a bitchez! *shakes fist*nefarious101 » 03 Dec 2025, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ awww shwitz....them muthafukers is screwin up ma bitcoin....
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
That's copywrited material you're stealing.....you may be subject to actually being a convicted felon, not just hallucinating about it.Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2025, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Naffy,
Lest you be consumed by your vapors, why don't you post your source and I'll tell you what you don't understand.
Where?RebelGator » 04 Dec 2025, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ That's copywrited material you're stealing.....you may be subject to actually being a convicted felon, not just hallucinating about it.
Can anyone make sense of this ****?PhiloBeddo » 03 Dec 2025, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody is forced to take a loan. You asked for it, pay it back and quit your crying. I have one question. Why don't banks offer low interest loan buy backs? Example: I have a 2% mortgage. You would think they would offer a discount off the principal to pay it back so they can loan it our for say 7 or 8%. I was just wondering.
And they won't let me post my DT dickhead pic.Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ Where?
Trust me on this - you haven't the vaguest idea what you're yapping about.
Well, at least Full of shyt Beddo admits he is wondering..