I go into cash frequently. Withdrawals just to cover living expenses. Not using options / leverage at the moment. That was for back in April when people panicked.Fuelman » 05 Dec 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ Currently there are 306 stocks in the S & P that are positive, granted the last 50 are just barely positive. The top 200 are performing well.
Retards need a place for their money to grow also.
I hope you are pulling some of those profits OUT of your trading account. Protect yourself from making the wrong call on a large scale.

Living expenses? Of course I guessed wrong, I figured the trading thing was a side hustle while chained to a J. O. B..LowIQTrash » 05 Dec 2025, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I go into cash frequently. Withdrawals just to cover living expenses. Not using options / leverage at the moment. That was for back in April when people panicked.
If anything I've missed 5-10 baggers this yr by being too conservativemg:
nefarious101 » 05 Dec 2025, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Dribbles still just uses 5 or 6 replies....
mostly likely copy and paste since Dribble's a Low IQ pedo=progressive LGBTP democrat...
Dribbles probably doesn't know SCOTUS just fixed the texas gerrymandering problem, giving MAGA and Trump the WIN
And Trump is the biggest damn crook we ever had in government. He makes Nixon look like a parking ticket.Fuelman » 05 Dec 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ Checkout the superannuation system in Australia.
Employers foot a 12% deposit (2025) into your account and you can add additional funds. Even part time employees get this benefit.
If you made some decent wages over the years it could end up a sizeable nest egg.
There may be crooks on wall Street but it doesn't even start to compare to government.
Government earns their approval rating:JohnnyYou » 05 Dec 2025, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ And Trump is the biggest damn crook we ever had in government. He makes Nixon look like a parking ticket.
Mrkelly » 05 Dec 2025, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑and tRump just pardoned a DEMOCRAT in Texas
a seat that the republicans were gonna use that DEMOCRATS crimes against him![]()
oops

nefarious101 » 05 Dec 2025, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ OMG Dribbles doesn't like bipartisanism....
sure says a lot about Dribbles' mindset
Dribbles is a sucker punch progressive..
Dribbles even creates threads where Dribbles can hide
show me just ONE other bipartisan thing that tRump has done lil drivel
well Dribbles cha....Mrkelly » 05 Dec 2025, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑show me just ONE other bipartisan thing that tRump has done lil drivel
there might be something… but I have my doubts![]()
this was a directive from tRumps boss .. Bibi

nefarious101 » 05 Dec 2025, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ well Dribbles cha....
Dribbles sounds a little angry cha
oh well Dribbles is triggered again cha-ching
Dribbles triggers so easily....and talk about the butthurt
Well, you drew me in, and I am armed with soft stool. But I haven't seen the OP, and right now I am responding to my notification.Fuelman » 05 Dec 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ I'm waiting for @Cannonpointer to come in here and leave a trail of diarrhea!![]()
![]()
This whole thing about blaming a **** demographic for ANYTHING (even blacks - and that's a lot for me to grant) isjust retar ted.Fuelman » 04 Dec 2025, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't intentionally mean to **** over the younger generations, I ask for your forgiveness. It just happened that way.
Never watched this Ramit Sethi get rich guy but it was a worthwhile listen
https://youtu.be/8MXYxFh4Y-M?si=cOb0EGtnlKPj-13Z
There are other videos in this series, might be worth checking out.
I found it amusing how the old method for boomers to get wealthy is outdated but the very first thing he mentions is regular automatic investing. That sounds oddly familiar.
You can unlock the secrets for a small fee and he probably has an options trading book!
I melted on pot a long long time ago. In a weird galaxy. I went to the same parties as Kavinutz..Cannonpointer » 05 Dec 2025, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ This whole thing about blaming a **** demographic for ANYTHING (even blacks - and that's a lot for me to grant) isjust retar ted.
*** grew up in the times they grew up in, and followed the rules as they understood them.
The rules changed? Okay. But "boomers" didn't change them. "Ruling elites" changed them.
Save it for another time, had a colonoscopy 2 weeks ago, brutal!Cannonpointer » 05 Dec 2025, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, you drew me in, and I am armed with soft stool. But I haven't seen the OP, and right now I am responding to my notification.
If you want my slippery feces to slip and slide about in, you will have to wait. I will be back, after I finish with my notifications and ingest some Metamucil.
Thanks for the confirmation.Cannonpointer » 05 Dec 2025, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ This whole thing about blaming a **** demographic for ANYTHING (even blacks - and that's a lot for me to grant) isjust retar ted.
*** grew up in the times they grew up in, and followed the rules as they understood them.
The rules changed? Okay. But "boomers" didn't change them. "Ruling elites" changed them.
Instead of criticizing the program Johnny, why don't you figure out what your account would be worth today if YOU were given $1000 at birth that was invested conservatively in the stock market?JohnnyYou » 04 Dec 2025, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ The 6 Billion the Wells gave to start a Trump Fund for every kid born is just more of the same.
Bent Knees Scott Bessent came out and said straight up it's a prelude to privitization of Social Security. What it is is more money in the stock market for the oligarchs to manipulate and hijack money from people.
The Australian model for retirement sounds appealing at this point compared to what we have.Zeets2 » 06 Dec 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ Instead of criticizing the program Johnny, why don't you figure out what your account would be worth today if YOU were given $1000 at birth that was invested conservatively in the stock market?
I bet you'd change your tune, and if you didn't, it would be due to your own jealousy!
And what's wrong with privatizing Social Security? How is it fair to pay into it for 50 years and then get nothing from it if you die at 66? In a privatized system, that money would still be yours and become an automatic life insurance policy payout for the rest of your family. How is that such a terrible thing as you claim?
The stalker market is a stagnant swamp of shyt. Printed dollars get collected there, devalueing currency. Like electrons, value has to flow to create anything.Zeets2 » 06 Dec 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ Instead of criticizing the program Johnny, why don't you figure out what your account would be worth today if YOU were given $1000 at birth that was invested conservatively in the stock market?
I bet you'd change your tune, and if you didn't, it would be due to your own jealousy!
And what's wrong with privatizing Social Security? How is it fair to pay into it for 50 years and then get nothing from it if you die at 66? In a privatized system, that money would still be yours and become an automatic life insurance policy payout for the rest of your family. How is that such a terrible thing as you claim?
You need to butter up to some Jews. They will make you money.
You should not need a colonoscopy. Regular fasting obviates it.Fuelman » 06 Dec 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ Save it for another time, had a colonoscopy 2 weeks ago, brutal!