I did not dig into the mentioned post.
Ask Twatty to show you.JohnnyYou » 28 Dec 2025, 2:31 am » wrote: ↑ I did not dig into the mentioned post.
You walk a staighter line than anyone here. I am sure we all cross it at times. I know I do.
The problem is the rulers of this joint only want one line at a time when the world is spiralling in several directions of down at once.
I do remember John Sauers arguments at the time of the debate for "Total Immunity". I made a meme for it which I can't share of course. It's a picture of the table of contents of Sauer's arguments under a painting of George Washington highlighting his premise the "The President is not an Officer of the United States". In hindsight, I guess I should agree that Trump sure as hell isn't. He isn't a President or an Officer. He just a total piece of shyt that got money from the Russian Mob.
Huey » 06 Dec 2025, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ BV is in question time out indefinitely, but no earlier than Mar 2026.
You said post it. You didn't say where. You r challenge is answered @Blackvegetable
Here, let me post that again. Do you see the first line in my sig box? Time for you to make your case. Questions will be on a one of one basis. Once we have established that you will answer on a one for one basis, you can ask all the questions you want. I don't come here go to be interrogated by a moron.
I see PG ****** Boy is at it again. Repost, Controlly:
1. The first line in my sig box is posted. If you PG it you are a ******.
2. That is not why you are pretending to ignore me. That had been in my sig box a while. It was because I was talking Vegas about the time we ignored you for weeks.
3. As far as questions, you could have question privileges back if you agree to answer a question for every question asked. But, being a ******, honestly answering questions would destroy your arguments.
Sorry PG ******, this is not a courtroom, you are not a lawyer and you are not going a cross or direct. Keep doing this and I will continue repost the sig so you are answered
An this is just in case you decide to PG my post again on your PG call out thread. You are a ****** like that.Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑Just sayin'....Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ @*TinyVictim yaps....
Here's your challenge
Post the first line of your sig.....
You know...
The very first line of my post above is the answer to your demand. Like a ****** you PGd it. That is why I posted it here as well.Huey » 01 Jan 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑Huey » 06 Dec 2025, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ BV is in question time out indefinitely, but no earlier than Mar 2026.
You said post it. You didn't say where. You r challenge is answered @Blackvegetable
Here, let me post that again. Do you see the first line in my sig box? Time for you to make your case. Questions will be on a one of one basis. Once we have established that you will answer on a one for one basis, you can ask all the questions you want. I don't come here go to be interrogated by a moron.
I see PG ****** Boy is at it again. Repost, Controlly:
1. The first line in my sig box is posted. If you PG it you are a ******.
2. That is not why you are pretending to ignore me. That had been in my sig box a while. It was because I was talking Vegas about the time we ignored you for weeks.
3. As far as questions, you could have question privileges back if you agree to answer a question for every question asked. But, being a ******, honestly answering questions would destroy your arguments.
Sorry PG ******, this is not a courtroom, you are not a lawyer and you are not going a cross or direct. Keep doing this and I will continue repost the sig so you are answered
An this is just in case you decide to PG my post again on your PG call out thread. You are a ****** like that.Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑Just sayin'....Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ @*TinyVictim yaps....
Here's your challenge
Post the first line of your sig.....
You know...
Just sayin'....
You know...
Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑Ask Twatty to show you.JohnnyYou » 28 Dec 2025, 2:31 am » wrote: ↑ I did not dig into the mentioned post.
You walk a staighter line than anyone here. I am sure we all cross it at times. I know I do.
The problem is the rulers of this joint only want one line at a time when the world is spiralling in several directions of down at once.
I do remember John Sauers arguments at the time of the debate for "Total Immunity". I made a meme for it which I can't share of course. It's a picture of the table of contents of Sauer's arguments under a painting of George Washington highlighting his premise the "The President is not an Officer of the United States". In hindsight, I guess I should agree that Trump sure as hell isn't. He isn't a President or an Officer. He just a total piece of shyt that got money from the Russian Mob.
You also PGd this one. Why are you such a ******? LMAO!Huey » 01 Jan 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑
Well, it can end now. All you have to do is agree that your questions will be answered on a one for one basis which Have proven I will abide by. If you don't, your timeout will be extended. Ball is in your court, control freak.
I am fine posting as it is now.
Huey » 06 Dec 2025, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ BV is in question time out indefinitely, but no earlier than Mar 2026.
You said post it. You didn't say where. You r challenge is answered @Blackvegetable
Here, let me post that again. Do you see the first line in my sig box? Time for you to make your case. Questions will be on a one of one basis. Once we have established that you will answer on a one for one basis, you can ask all the questions you want. I don't come here go to be interrogated by a moron.
I see PG ****** Boy is at it again. Repost, Controlly:
1. The first line in my sig box is posted. If you PG it you are a ******.
2. That is not why you are pretending to ignore me. That had been in my sig box a while. It was because I was talking Vegas about the time we ignored you for weeks.
3. As far as questions, you could have question privileges back if you agree to answer a question for every question asked. But, being a ******, honestly answering questions would destroy your arguments.
Sorry PG ******, this is not a courtroom, you are not a lawyer and you are not going a cross or direct. Keep doing this and I will continue repost the sig so you are answered
And there it is again. You can't PG this one, lil girl.Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑BumpBlackvegetable » 06 Dec 2025, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ People, where's the ambiguity here?
what will satisfy the challenge?
THE FIRST LINE OF THE SIG
what will not satisfy the challenge?
ANYTHING, OR EVERYTHING, ELSE.
Why?
BECAUSE THE FIRST LINE OF THE SIG IS ALL THAT IS AT ISSUE