Liberal Forum

jerrab » 10 Dec 2025, 3:12 am » wrote: ↑

10 Dec 2025, 3:12 am

now who is lying?


 

The buzzard man.
 

JohnnyYou » 11 Dec 2025, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 4:26 pm

Calrence Thomas and Alito?  Ha!   The gang of 5 conservatives are political hacks.  They gave POTUS immunity. If you lose to a dem you are toast.
 
If you lose the house and the senate 2026 you are goners.   Articles of impeachment were made against Hegsethh and RFK yesterday..  Whooping Cough is back.

And the 3 liberal idiots on the SC are liberal hacks.  Your point?

Looks like while you're busy counting your chickens, the country is just beginning an economic boom that will lower inflation, lower gas prices even further, stop the illegal drug traffic, lower crime levels by deporting thousands of illegals, watch the stock market skyrocket to unheard of levels, continued cuts in the interest rates that are coming, and Republican voters will be delighted by the coming $2000 rebate that Trump is sure to deliver just before the election next year.

So keep dreaming, liberal!


 

Zeets2 » 11 Dec 2025, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 4:36 pm

And the 3 liberal idiots on the SC are liberal hacks.  Your point?

Amendment:  9 Justices, one elected by the people every two years on rotation for an 18 year term.
 

JohnnyYou » 11 Dec 2025, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 4:26 pm

Calrence Thomas and Alito?  Ha!   The gang of 5 conservatives are political hacks.  They gave POTUS immunity. If you lose to a dem you are toast.
 
If you lose the house and the senate 2026 you are goners.   Articles of impeachment were made against Hegsethh and RFK yesterday..  Whooping Cough is back.

All presidents have immunity you ignert jig!

murdock » 11 Dec 2025, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 4:40 pm

All presidents have immunity you ignert jig!

Truman didn't need it.. And he used WMD.

Trump initiated the request for immunity to do whatever the **** he wanted.

First time in 250 years anyone made the request.

 
 

Zeets2 » 11 Dec 2025, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 4:27 pm

Yeah, and we defeated them, didn't we?
Had England wiped out the American colonists in that war, we'd still be part of England, wouldn't we?  
But we fought them and beat them to become sovereign.
And if Hamas could defeat Israel, they would too, but they can't!  So their options are to live within Israeli rule or be crushed, which is exactly what has taken place since Oct. 7th. Hamas started this war, and Israel is now in the process of finishing it, and you Jew haters can't stand that!

do you realize  you make no sense? there should not have been a revolution in the first place according to your post;

your post==

Romans 13:1“Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established.” 
– Romans 13:11
 
 

Zeets2 » 11 Dec 2025, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 4:36 pm

And the 3 liberal idiots on the SC are liberal hacks.  Your point?

Looks like while you're busy counting your chickens, the country is just beginning an economic boom that will lower inflation, lower gas prices even further, stop the illegal drug traffic, lower crime levels by deporting thousands of illegals, watch the stock market skyrocket to unheard of levels, continued cuts in the interest rates that are coming, and Republican voters will be delighted by the coming $2000 rebate that Trump is sure to deliver just before the election next year.

So keep dreaming, liberal!

go to germany and tell them to reinstall the nazi party


Romans 13:1“Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established.” 
– Romans 13:11

JohnnyYou » 11 Dec 2025, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 4:58 pm

Truman didn't need it.. And he used WMD.

Trump initiated the request for immunity to do whatever the **** he wanted.

First time in 250 years anyone made the request.

Prove you leftist bish!

Johnny You » 11 Dec 2025, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 4:38 pm

Amendment:  9 Justices, one elected by the people every two years on rotation for an 18 year term.
 

Doesn't remove political management for those living in plain sight daily changing form since shaped a fertilized cell same chromosomes in channeled DNA streaming ancestral lineages' results added since inception of original great great grandparent generations lived before the arrival of each great great grandchild born daily here in this atmosphere so far.

Your mind really doesn't pay attention to how your own time lived until now. So busy pretending your character runs deeper than your chromosomes inhabiting space now. You aren't the only one doing that. Very few ever acknowledge why they exist in plain sight because humanity doesn't allow it in any reality currently governing tomorrows every 2 literal days a week each rotation forward now.

murdock » 11 Dec 2025, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 7:43 pm

Prove you leftist bish!

Does your Mom have to wash your dick for you with her mouth to prove to you  it is clean?  Get Sober man.

Yes, a President (Donald Trump) has recently claimed broad immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts, leading to a major Supreme Court case (Trump v. United States) that established some immunity for official acts but rejected absolute immunity, differentiating between official duties (presumptive immunity) and private conduct (no immunity), with the Court sending the case back to lower courts for review based on this new framework. While past presidents didn't make such sweeping legal claims, the executive branch has long argued for broad immunity, and President Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon, implying a need for resolution after leaving office. 
Key Moments & Rulings:

• no spam : Donald Trump argued for absolute immunity for all actions as President, even unofficial ones, in his federal election interference case.
• no spam  (July 2024): The Court ruled that former presidents have presumptive immunity for official acts, but not for unofficial acts.
• no spam : The Court created a test for lower courts to decide if a specific charge relates to an "official act" (immune) or "unofficial act" (not immune).
• no spam : President Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, a move seen as necessary because Nixon wasn't immune after leaving office, suggesting a lack of legal precedent for immunity then, says  no spam . 

In Summary: While no sitting president formally requested immunity from courts in the way Trump did, the executive branch has asserted broad immunity, and the recent Supreme Court decision for Donald Trump clarified that some immunity exists for official acts, but not absolute immunity. 


 

*31stArrival » 12 Dec 2025, 5:46 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 5:46 am

Your mind really doesn't pay attention to how your own time lived until now. 

Your time here is a complete waste.
 

Johnny You » 12 Dec 2025, 6:05 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 6:05 am

Your time here is a complete waste.
 

Oh gee, I feel so demoralized. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Your mind over matter mentality doesn't effect my brain navigating time adapting uniquely me equally alive as 8.2 billion others inhabiting space now.

*31stArrival » 12 Dec 2025, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 6:49 am

Oh gee, I feel so demoralized. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Your mind over matter mentality doesn't effect my brain navigating time adapting uniquely me equally alive as 8.2 billion others inhabiting space now.

It's ok,  I realize my time here is a complete waste too.

Someday you will figure out there are 8.2 Billion centers to the universe and yours is just one more on the pile.
 

JohnnyYou » 12 Dec 2025, 5:47 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 5:47 am

Does your Mom have to wash your dick for you with her mouth to prove to you  it is clean?  Get Sober man.

Yes, a President (Donald Trump) has recently claimed broad immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts, leading to a major Supreme Court case (Trump v. United States) that established some immunity for official acts but rejected absolute immunity, differentiating between official duties (presumptive immunity) and private conduct (no immunity), with the Court sending the case back to lower courts for review based on this new framework. While past presidents didn't make such sweeping legal claims, the executive branch has long argued for broad immunity, and President Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon, implying a need for resolution after leaving office. 
Key Moments & Rulings:

• no spam : Donald Trump argued for absolute immunity for all actions as President, even unofficial ones, in his federal election interference case.
• no spam  (July 2024): The Court ruled that former presidents have presumptive immunity for official acts, but not for unofficial acts.
• no spam : The Court created a test for lower courts to decide if a specific charge relates to an "official act" (immune) or "unofficial act" (not immune).
• no spam : President Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, a move seen as necessary because Nixon wasn't immune after leaving office, suggesting a lack of legal precedent for immunity then, says  no spam . 

In Summary: While no sitting president formally requested immunity from courts in the way Trump did, the executive branch has asserted broad immunity, and the recent Supreme Court decision for Donald Trump clarified that some immunity exists for official acts, but not absolute immunity.

only a criminal would ask for immunity.

only a crooked court would give it to him.

JohnnyYou » 12 Dec 2025, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 6:57 am

It's ok,  I realize my time here is a complete waste too.

Someday you will figure out there are 8.2 Billion centers to the universe and yours is just one more on the pile.

sole has no thnking process.

JohnnyYou » 11 Dec 2025, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 11:48 am

Mirror Mirror on the Wall, Is Trump a Christian  at all?

NOPE

jerrab » 09 Dec 2025, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2025, 6:04 pm

 i  never said he will make it his own.

he will put up a hotel or 2.

You have said it many times skumbag.
 

jerrab » 11 Dec 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Dec 2025, 3:40 pm

 Acts 5:29-32
New International Version29 Peter and the other apostles replied: “We must obey God rather than human beings! 30 The God of our ancestors raised Jesus from the dead—whom you killed by hanging him on a cross. 31 God exalted him to his own right hand as Prince and Savior that he might bring Israel to repentance and forgive their sins. 32 We are witnesses of these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him.

acts 5

27 The apostles were brought in and made to appear before the Sanhedrin to be questioned by the high priest. 28 “We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name,” he said. “Yet you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and are determined to make us guilty of this man’s blood.”29 Peter and the other apostles replied: “We must obey God rather than human beings! 30 The God of our ancestors raised Jesus from the dead—whom you killed by hanging him on a cross. 31 God exalted him to his own right hand as Prince and Savior that he might bring Israel to repentance and forgive their sins. 32 We are witnesses of these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him.”
 

jerrab » 12 Dec 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 7:18 am

acts 5

27 The apostles were brought in and made to appear before the Sanhedrin to be questioned by the high priest. 28 “We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name,” he said. “Yet you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and are determined to make us guilty of this man’s blood.”29 Peter and the other apostles replied: “We must obey God rather than human beings! 30 The God of our ancestors raised Jesus from the dead—whom you killed by hanging him on a cross. 31 God exalted him to his own right hand as Prince and Savior that he might bring Israel to repentance and forgive their sins. 32 We are witnesses of these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him.”

The bible is to confusing for MAGA.. Their interpretations are corrupt. Not that  I take much time for it myself.  

So I am wondering what Judge Napolitano is saying about siezing the tanker?

Judge Andrew Napolitano has strongly condemned recent U.S. actions related to the seizure of a Venezuelan oil tanker (named the Skipper, previously Adisa) as well as the related military strike on an alleged drug boat, labeling them as "war crimes" and an "act of international piracy". 
Napolitano, a legal analyst for Newsmax, has stated that: 

• The U.S. military operation, specifically a second strike on a vessel that left survivors, was an "act of a war crime".
• Ordering survivors, who by law should be rescued, to be "murdered" has "absolutely no legal basis".
• Everyone involved in the order and execution of the strike, from the Defense Secretary to the people who "pulled the trigger," should be prosecuted for a war crime.
• He predicted a potential court-martial over the boat strikes.
• He argues that seizing the oil tanker itself, despite U.S. sanctions targeting illicit oil trade to sanctioned entities like Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), constitutes a "blatant theft and an act of international piracy" in the view of the Venezuelan government. 

Napolitano asserts that while the administration labels the targets as "terrorists," this is a political, not legal, term, and does not justify the use of military force and extrajudicial killing of survivors in international waters. The US administration has defended the actions as proper procedure under international law and sanctions against entities funding terrorism. 
 

Johnny You » 12 Dec 2025, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 6:57 am

It's ok,  I realize my time here is a complete waste too.

Someday you will figure out there are 8.2 Billion centers to the universe and yours is just one more on the pile.
 

sole displacement inhabiting space from a position ancestrally set since conceived in time to exist changing form since arrived a fertilized cell of combined chromosomes never duplicated again.

It is never a waste of time explaining to everyone how humanity corrupted their entire ancestral lineage last 350 generations lived to date planet is still rotating here now.

Devil lived in details inaccurately defining life evolved in plain sight and contextual planed expectations of 7 tomorrows forward so far. 2 of the 7 factually exist dawn to dusk each rotation here now.

Dawn is the leading half of this rotating planet revolving around a star. Noon is the geographical point between dawn to dusk daylight happens for those living dusk to dawn facing the universe beyond this solar system AM of tomorrow and PM end of the day noon to midnight/international dateline longitude 180 degrees from Greenwich Prime meridian 0/360 completed rotation to what goes around comes around Karma 8 seasonal shifts a year.