If he wants to change it to that . Fine and dandyCannonpointer » 08 Dec 2025, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, I sorted that. And I am all for the bet. But the penalty should be the name change, winner dictates. Also the avatar.
I like this wager. If the loser welches, I'll adjudicate.Mrkelly » 09 Dec 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ If he wants to change it to that . Fine and dandy
I would like to add my original bet of 1000 greenies
we can take care of that too
@Cannonpointer @Mrkelly this was the original bet. Mrkelly laughed and called it weak. The bet is banned for life on NHB. Right kelly? One of you is leavingMR-7 » 07 Dec 2025, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure....If you were to win, I will change my name on here, (to whatever you say), for 30 days. Same, If I were to win.
wouldn't it be hilarious both parties loose 30 seats each within both parties by whom gets elected running in both? How? persons navigating with their brain, not directing social agendas to shape future rotations life only evolves in existing one at a time since conceived to replace previous generation gaps lived so far.
Uh? Both lose 30 seats how is that possible?*31stArrival » 11 Dec 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ wouldn't it be hilarious both parties loose 30 seats each within both parties by whom gets elected running in both? How? persons navigating with their brain, not directing social agendas to shape future rotations life only evolves in existing one at a time since conceived to replace previous generation gaps lived so far.
time is not fluid since event horizons isolate each ancestor alive by specific chromosomes in streaming DNA results inhabiting space now.
remember Tea Party, relabeled Trump's people. There is a silent majority of ancestors that don't like being intellectually typecast by context over chromosomes cradle to grave what ever generation gap they evolve into after birth while adapting in space specifically alive conceived to dead..
How would you socially defending your faith ever see protecting your time lived in real space individually evolving one at time genetically here since a fertilized cell doesn't evolve by intellect alone. People being of character defined by rule of law don't have to be honest about their actual time alive and those that are are removed from people obeying social consensus. Christmas is all about that outcome. Same as Easter Sunday.
so CP doesn’t want to get involved in the lifetime ban betMR-7 » 07 Dec 2025, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure....If you were to win, I will change my name on here, (to whatever you say), for 30 days. Same, If I were to win.
OK, kelly. I mean, the other retards would be lost without your trifle. So, you are on. But don't make this a habit of backing out of bets MoFo.Mrkelly » 19 Dec 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑ so CP doesn’t want to get involved in the lifetime ban bet
but is is up for the one your are suggesting above
so let’s make a bet of
the power to change the others name and avatar for 30 days … plus 1000 greenies
do we have a bet?
MR-7 » 19 Dec 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ OK, kelly. I mean, the other retards would be lost without your trifle. So, you are on. But don't make this a habit of backing out of bets MoFo.
we just got done making the bet. and now, you want to change it back. this makes you an Indian giver. Or a *** who's a re-***......this is the bet retard...viewtopic.php?p=2827832#p2827832Mrkelly » 19 Dec 2025, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑backing out
OK … if you can talk CP into overseeing the lifetime ban I am all in
@Cannonpointer
Mrkelly » 19 Dec 2025, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑backing out
OK … if you can talk CP into overseeing the lifetime ban I am all in
@Cannonpointer
We will just have to wait and see.
MR-7 » 19 Dec 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ we just got done making the bet. and now, you want to change it back. this makes you an Indian giver. Or a *** who's a re-***......this is the bet retard...viewtopic.php?p=2827832#p2827832
Take it or leave it....Mrkelly » 19 Dec 2025, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑Who is backing out now?
let make the bet … life time ban
******
How many times will you renig, nig?Mrkelly » 19 Dec 2025, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑Who is backing out now?
let make the bet … life time ban
******
Mrkelly » 07 Dec 2025, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ OK
What do you want to bet ?
after all
you tagged me wanting to bet
Well now, what's this all about.roadkill » 19 Dec 2025, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll bet you 1,000 greenies that you won't define a "progressive".
Fake answers don't count.