Irrelevant, face saving damage control on your part...Mrkelly » 21 Dec 2025, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑they DONT have control of the vote or the money buckwheat
spin indeed
awwwwwwwwwwww*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2025, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Irrelevant, face saving damage control on your part...![]()
Every vote carries as much weight as the next....plus if Biden/Harris/Soros had won the budget would have been about the same...except the military would still be wasting money on your pro sexual deviant agenda....![]()
You're welcome for the free lesson.
to this point*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2025, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Irrelevant, face saving damage control on your part...![]()
Every vote carries as much weight as the next....plus if Biden/Harris/Soros had won the budget would have been about the same...except the military would still be wasting money on your pro sexual deviant agenda....![]()
You're welcome for the free lesson.
Irrelevant, face saving damage control on your part...INTENT is all that matters buckwheat....Mrkelly » 21 Dec 2025, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑ to this point
the republicans needed only one democrat to vote with them in the House of Representatives
they needed ZERO in the senate to pass the defense budget
*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2025, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Irrelevant, face saving damage control on your part...INTENT is all that matters buckwheat....![]()
Every vote carries as much weight as the next....plus if Biden/Harris/Soros had won the budget would have been about the same...except the military would still be wasting money on your pro sexual deviant agenda....![]()
You're welcome for the free lesson.
Every vote carries an equal amount of weight and a majority of Democrats voted for the bill little guy....so go have yourself a good cry and please stop tugging at my pants leg for attention.....Mrkelly » 21 Dec 2025, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ when you already have more than the required votes to pass something
Every vote DOES NOT “carry as much weight as the next” buckwheat![]()
keep on tRumpin![]()
I guess that is why votes for POTUS count tree times as much in Vermont and Montana as they do in California and Texas.*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2025, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Every vote carries an equal amount of weight and a majority of Democrats voted for the bill little guy....so go have yourself a good cry and please stop tugging at my pants leg for attention.....
So every dissapointment you have with Trump is the Democrats fault.MR-7 » 08 Dec 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ U.S. lawmakers on Sunday unveiled an no spam authorizing a record $901 billion in national security spending next year, billions more than President Donald Trump's request, and provides $400 million in military assistance to Ukraine.
The sweeping 3,000-page bill includes a 4% raise for enlisted troops but excludes a bipartisan effort to spur housing construction that some lawmakers had hoped to include in the final bill.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said in a statement that the legislation would advance Trump's agenda by "ending woke ideology at the Pentagon, securing the border, revitalizing the defense industrial base, and restoring the warrior ethos."
Earlier this year, Republicans defeated Democrat efforts to block the deployment of the military to American cities and to bar the conversion of a luxury jet given by Qatar to serve as Air Force One.
That's TRUMP getting it done. Oh, and it's another **** record‑shattering event. Seems to happen a lot.
no spam
this year’s NDAA isn’t just “big,” it’s record‑shattering. The Pentagon budget has officially crossed into the $900 billion era, which is a meme‑worthy milestone in itself.
You are comparing apples to oranges.JohnnyYou » 22 Dec 2025, 4:31 am » wrote: ↑ I guess that is why votes for POTUS count tree times as much in Vermont and Montana as they do in California and Texas.
We would tug at your brain strings if you could demonstrate any noorahhhl connnectivity..
How did your daughter get that plate stuck in her lower lip? What kind of parent are you?*GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Dec 2025, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ You are comparing apples to oranges.
This subject is about Bipartisan support for a bill that enabled a spending bill to pass.
Evidentally you aren't intelligent enough to be able to tell the difference between that and the weighted differences in representation that the citizens of various States enjoy.
Let's bear in mind that you are the guy who claimed to be a Nuclear Physicist, yet you spell the word NEUTRON......*NUETRON*..... over and over like an imbecile
Never said they didn’t buckwheat*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2025, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Every vote carries an equal amount of weight and a majority of Democrats voted for the bill little guy....so go have yourself a good cry and please stop tugging at my pants leg for attention.....
Do you still get Kameltoe's newsletter?Mrkelly » 22 Dec 2025, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑ Never said they didn’t buckwheat
but the dems don’t have control
both sides love them some war
the OP made it sound like tRump wasn’t into it
tRumpers
Are you still nauseated at the thought of consensual oral sodomy?
Yes, so give it up.....I'm not interested.Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Are you still nauseated at the thought of consensual oral sodomy?
Just another instance for you to feel small.
MR-7 » 08 Dec 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ U.S. lawmakers on Sunday unveiled an annual defense policy bill authorizing a record $901 billion in national security spending next year, billions more than President Donald Trump's request, and provides $400 million in military assistance to Ukraine.
The sweeping 3,000-page bill includes a 4% raise for enlisted troops but excludes a bipartisan effort to spur housing construction that some lawmakers had hoped to include in the final bill.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said in a statement that the legislation would advance Trump's agenda by "ending woke ideology at the Pentagon, securing the border, revitalizing the defense industrial base, and restoring the warrior ethos."
Earlier this year, Republicans defeated Democrat efforts to block the deployment of the military to American cities and to bar the conversion of a luxury jet given by Qatar to serve as Air Force One.
That's TRUMP getting it done. Oh, and it's another **** record‑shattering event. Seems to happen a lot.
'26 National Defense Authorization Act: Record $901B for National Security | Newsmax.com
this year’s NDAA isn’t just “big,” it’s record‑shattering. The Pentagon budget has officially crossed into the $900 billion era, which is a meme‑worthy milestone in itself.
He certainly is.Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2025, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ This is Big Beautiful, Grifty's baby...
The democrats didn't submit the budget request and don't have the votes to pass it.
You're a **** idiot
murdock » 07 Jan 2026, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Leftist child molesting pieces of **** are the only IDIOTS who do the above!
Cease to exist you filthy traitor cocksucker!