Liberal Forum

https://nypost.com/2025/12/12/us-news/w ... in-photos/

They appear to be from the 90s and or early 2000s.
 

Huey » 12 Dec 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 11:49 am

https://nypost.com/2025/12/12/us-news/w ... in-photos/

They appear to be from the 90s and or early 2000s.

I'm thinking late 80's early 90's...

“Other images released Friday included photos of sex toys. “ who are in these photos with the sex toys?

That hoax is dead. Nobody gives a ****

PhiloBeddo » 12 Dec 2025, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 4:18 pm

That hoax is dead. Nobody gives a ****

Explain how the epstein affair is a hoax. Who told you to think that?

Does the network which told you to think that routinely call Bruce Jenner a woman?

Can you define woman?

Huey » 12 Dec 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 11:49 am

https://nypost.com/2025/12/12/us-news/w ... in-photos/

They appear to be from the 90s and or early 2000s.

Epstein set up a honey trap on an island and took video of powerful and influential people raping young girls - very likely young boys, as well. 

The press just fed you decades-old snapshots of fully clothed power players smiling into the camera for the paparazzi. 

I think you are competent to understand that associating with epstein and raping children are two different levels of career endangerment. You DO get that, right? That feloniously raping children and having a social drink are different things?

Is this how easily you are bought off? You think this cheap **** is ANY PART of epstein's kompromat? 

Do you understand that the photos you are displaying do NOT come from the epstein files, or from Epstein Island? They come from rags. They were published DECADES AGO in the rags that paid the paparazzi who snapped them. They are nothing new. 

I will give you a clue how to tell if something came from the epstein files. There won't be any clothing in those. If you see fully clothed people smiling as if they are doing nothing illegal, you are being conned. You are being condescended to.

"Condescended to" means being talked to like you are stupid. 
 
 
 

ROG62 » 12 Dec 2025, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 2:27 pm

I'm thinking late 80's early 90's...

The temporality is less important than the provenance. 

To think those have anything to do with Epstein Island, you have to be retarded. Those photos CANNOT have come from Epstein Island. To be "released," as the OP retardedly believes, they would need to be part of Epstein's blackmail material. Do those appear to be blackmail material to YOU?

Those in possession of Epstein's kompromat have proof of world leaders and movers and shakers raping kids. Epstein did not have those photosin the OP. Those were culled from celebrity rags. 

Those photos were not taken by Epstein, to blackmail world leaders. They were taken by paparazzi, to make a half yard or a benjamin. 

To go along with the insulting proposition that these are part of the epstein kompromat is to appear sandwich gay and gump stupid. 
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2025, 10:52 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 10:52 pm

The temporality is less important than the provenance. 

To think those have anything to do with Epstein Island, you have to be retarded. Those photos CANNOT have come from Epstein Island. To be "released," as the OP retardedly believes, they would need to be part of Epstein's blackmail material. Do those appear to be blackmail material to YOU?

Those in possession of Epstein's kompromat have proof of world leaders and movers and shakers raping kids. Epstein did not have those photosin the OP. Those were culled from celebrity rags. 

Those photos were not taken by Epstein, to blackmail world leaders. They were taken by paparazzi, to make a half yard or a benjamin. 

To go along with the insulting proposition that these are part of the epstein kompromat is to appear sandwich gay and gump stupid.

I wonder if Jeffery tried Bill Gates Bug Meat..

 

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2025, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 10:44 pm

Epstein set up a honey trap on an island and took video of powerful and influential people raping young girls - very likely young boys, as well. 

The press just fed you decades-old snapshots of fully clothed power players smiling into the camera for the paparazzi. 

I think you are competent to understand that associating with epstein and raping children are two different levels of career endangerment. You DO get that, right? That feloniously raping children and having a social drink are different things?

Is this how easily you are bought off? You think this cheap **** is ANY PART of epstein's kompromat? 

Do you understand that the photos you are displaying do NOT come from the epstein files, or from Epstein Island? They come from rags. They were published DECADES AGO in the rags that paid the paparazzi who snapped them. They are nothing new. 

I will give you a clue how to tell if something came from the epstein files. There won't be any clothing in those. If you see fully clothed people smiling as if they are doing nothing illegal, you are being conned. You are being condescended to.

"Condescended to" means being talked to like you are stupid.

Hate to bread it to you, ASSWIPER, but the Trump photo is from the 1996 Miss Universe pageant and has NOTHING to do with Epstein.

It's how YOUR media you love so much twists you **** into a pretzel and regurgitating the **** they feed you daily.

Where are the videos? You know he had hidden cameras all over the island in rooms

Huey » 12 Dec 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 11:49 am

https://nypost.com/2025/12/12/us-news/w ... in-photos/

They appear to be from the 90s and or early 2000s.

Yea but where were they taken?   What city were they taken in?   

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2025, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 10:44 pm

Epstein set up a honey trap on an island and took video of powerful and influential people raping young girls - very likely young boys, as well. 

The press just fed you decades-old snapshots of fully clothed power players smiling into the camera for the paparazzi. 

I think you are competent to understand that associating with epstein and raping children are two different levels of career endangerment. You DO get that, right? That feloniously raping children and having a social drink are different things?

Is this how easily you are bought off? You think this cheap **** is ANY PART of epstein's kompromat? 

Do you understand that the photos you are displaying do NOT come from the epstein files, or from Epstein Island? They come from rags. They were published DECADES AGO in the rags that paid the paparazzi who snapped them. They are nothing new. 

I will give you a clue how to tell if something came from the epstein files. There won't be any clothing in those. If you see fully clothed people smiling as if they are doing nothing illegal, you are being conned. You are being condescended to.

"Condescended to" means being talked to like you are stupid.

I think you are competent to understand that associating with epstein and raping children are two different levels of career endangerment. You DO get that, right? That feloniously raping children and having a social drink are different things?

Is this how easily you are bought off? You think this cheap **** is ANY PART of epstein's kompromat? 

Do you understand that the photos you are displaying do NOT come from the epstein files, or from Epstein Island? They come from rags. They were published DECADES AGO in the rags that paid the paparazzi who snapped them. They are nothing new. 

You DO get that, right? That feloniously raping children and having a social drink are different things

Yup.

BuckNaked » 13 Dec 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2025, 8:32 am

Yea but where were they taken?   What city were they taken in?

I have the same questions.  What year?
 

Huey » 13 Dec 2025, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2025, 8:40 am

I have the same questions.  What year?

No idea and I’m unaware how anyone could prove the year 

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2025, 10:52 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 10:52 pm

The temporality is less important than the provenance. 

To think those have anything to do with Epstein Island, you have to be retarded. Those photos CANNOT have come from Epstein Island. To be "released," as the OP retardedly believes, they would need to be part of Epstein's blackmail material. Do those appear to be blackmail material to YOU?

Those in possession of Epstein's kompromat have proof of world leaders and movers and shakers raping kids. Epstein did not have those photosin the OP. Those were culled from celebrity rags. 

Those photos were not taken by Epstein, to blackmail world leaders. They were taken by paparazzi, to make a half yard or a benjamin. 

To go along with the insulting proposition that these are part of the epstein kompromat is to appear sandwich gay and gump stupid.

Agree totally...they were only posted to "associate", proving nothing...

just another "we got him now" fallacy...
 

The Reuters-Ipsos poll asked whether Americans believed that Trump was not aware of Epstein’s alleged crimes before they became public. Just 18% said it was “somewhat” or “very” likely that Trump didn’t know. Fully 60% said it was “not too” or “not at all” likely that Trump didn’t know. That’s a 3-to-1 margin believing Trump knew something.

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2025, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2025, 8:48 pm

The Reuters-Ipsos poll asked whether Americans believed that Trump was not aware of Epstein’s alleged crimes before they became public. Just 18% said it was “somewhat” or “very” likely that Trump didn’t know. Fully 60% said it was “not too” or “not at all” likely that Trump didn’t know. That’s a 3-to-1 margin believing Trump knew something.

akheem what kind of name is that anyway?    He sent Epstein a letter asking for a donation after he was convicted of sex crimes 

BuckNaked » 13 Dec 2025, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2025, 9:04 pm

akheem what kind of name is that anyway?    He sent Epstein a letter asking for a donation after he was convicted of sex crimes

He didn't 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2025, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2025, 9:19 pm

He didn't

Oh yes he did 

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2025, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2025, 10:44 pm

Epstein set up a honey trap on an island and took video of powerful and influential people raping young girls - very likely young boys, as well. 

The press just fed you decades-old snapshots of fully clothed power players smiling into the camera for the paparazzi. 

I think you are competent to understand that associating with epstein and raping children are two different levels of career endangerment. You DO get that, right? That feloniously raping children and having a social drink are different things?

Is this how easily you are bought off? You think this cheap **** is ANY PART of epstein's kompromat? 

Do you understand that the photos you are displaying do NOT come from the epstein files, or from Epstein Island? They come from rags. They were published DECADES AGO in the rags that paid the paparazzi who snapped them. They are nothing new. 

I will give you a clue how to tell if something came from the epstein files. There won't be any clothing in those. If you see fully clothed people smiling as if they are doing nothing illegal, you are being conned. You are being condescended to.

"Condescended to" means being talked to like you are stupid.

I hear there is a claim that the Trump photo is from a Miss Universe pageant. The faces were blacked out to make it appear the photo was from Rape Island.
 https://thepostmillennial.com/dems-shar ... er-epstein