Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2025, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/po ... es-photos/
His Vanity Fair photos of Trumpworld blew up online. We called to talk.
On Tuesday, Vanity Fair published a two-part story by Chris Whipple about the inner circle of President Donald Trump’s staff featuring unusually candid conversations with Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. It also featured remarkably unvarnished portraits of Wiles, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Karoline Leavitt, all photographed by Christopher Anderson.
How does anyone know?
It's funny to have a gay man characterize my response as "fear" and "hate." How I would characterize it is "opposition." I firmly and UNRELENTINGLY OPPOSE the tranny agenda. You go along with it. You continue to trust and respect sources who tell you that Bruce Jenner is a woman.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Unlike you, I don't get petrified with fear and hate over a mental patient who wears a dress or thinks he's Napoleon for that matter.
They call him her, and she, you stupid queer. They celebrate his "leading role" in the "LGBTQ community." They call him Caitlyn, you unmanned fruit.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑Can you show me the quote where any host on Fox News stated that he WAS a woman as you stupidly claim?
Is that your latest excuse for fox going along with the tranny agenda?They HAD to, to "mollify" Biden?Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑Or did they simply book him as a guest to mollify the Biden authorization that catered to the tranny agenda?
So you DENY it, immediately after excusing it as "mollifying" Biden.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑Because I won't believe they ever did, knowing what a lying scumbag you are. Not having seen it or cared to watch it, I've got nothing but your words to qualify that fact. So either support your lies with the exact quote or admit that you've been caught in a flagrant lie once again!

Your childish characterization seems to give you a measure of vicarious thrill, probably what you beat off to every night, sissyboi. Those of us who are straight have no need to continually provide you with assurances to such a myopic loser as you.Cannonpointer » 28 Dec 2025, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ It's funny to have a gay man characterize my response as "fear" and "hate." How I would characterize it is "opposition." I firmly and UNRELENTINGLY OPPOSE the tranny agenda. You go along with it. You continue to trust and respect sources who tell you that Bruce Jenner is a woman.
They call him her, and she, you stupid queer. They celebrate his "leading role" in the "LGBTQ community." They call him Caitlyn, you unmanned fruit.
Is that your latest excuse for fox going along with the tranny agenda?They HAD to, to "mollify" Biden?
Can you even remember thinking like a man?
And Bruce Jenner is not a mere "guest." Bruce Jenner is an ON AIR CONTRIBUTOR. So nice try at a cheap dodge.
So you DENY it, immediately after excusing it as "mollifying" Biden.
Pick a lane, ***. You are making two different claims in the same post. That is some very weak sauce, loser.
Here is Bruce Jenner - whom hannity calls "Caitlyn" - being the "good" tranny for you simple-minded, effeminate fox-fool ***:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXsrwROVRuw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5X9EtZEpLko
You are RELIABLY leftist. Everything comes back to sex with you fruitcakes.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Your childish characterization seems to give you a measure of vicarious thrill, probably what you beat off to every night, sissyboi.
You get your "news" and "views" from a station that elevates transgenderism.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑Those of us who are straight have no need to continually provide you with assurances to such a myopic loser as you.
There is is. Charges of "homophobia." A lefitist standby, followed immediately and reliably with a charge of envy - the cheap neocon standby. You are a trotskyite, and you know nothing about Trotsky. You are what I call a downstream trotskyite loser.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Somehow, the huge ratings that Fox News has achieved for decades will continue unabated without worrying about the homophobic antics of paupers like you who can't afford cable TV and who need to hide their poverty by attacking those more wealthy and successful.
Please focus your attention anywhere but my ***, loser.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ So take your moronic opinions of others and stick them up your ***.
You're EXTREMELY "conservative," fruitcake - as you defend the tranny agenda with leftist talking points.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm quite content in the knowledge that my many years here as a staunch conservative poster is sufficient to counter your idiotic lies, and I've wasted as much time as I care to with such a loser as you've proven to be ad nauseum.

YOU'RE the idiot that can't stand hearing or seeing anything or anyone who can accept or ignore anyone who isn't afraid to hear from a new network that doesn't meet your own idiotic requirements due to your own lack of confidence in your own manhood. That's the mark of an insecure loser and a weak sissyboi. I'm obviously not as frightened as you are that I'll succumb to your own secret desire to wear a dress outside of your closet, and simply because a dope like you considers it "defending" the tranny agenda to watch the most popular news network in history. And the viewpoint of a myopic loser like yourself isn't about to change that!Cannonpointer » 28 Dec 2025, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑ You are RELIABLY leftist. Everything comes back to sex with you fruitcakes.
You're EXTREMELY "conservative," fruitcake - as you defend the tranny agenda with leftist talking points.![]()
Again with the leftist talking points.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU'RE the idiot that can't stand hearing or seeing anything or anyone who can accept or ignore anyone who isn't afraid to hear from a new network that doesn't meet your own idiotic requirements due to your own lack of confidence in your own manhood.
Yes, yes - opposing the tranny agenda is "insecurity." Going along with it is manly, Major Burns.
THERE ya go, fruity. The reason people oppose the tranny agenda is because they are afraid they are secretly trannies.Zeets2 » 28 Dec 2025, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm obviously not as frightened as you are that I'll succumb to your own secret desire to wear a dress outside of your closet, and simply because a dope like you considers it "defending" the tranny agenda to watch the most popular news network in history. And the viewpoint of a myopic loser like yourself isn't about to change that!

Have you ANY clue at all what a droning bore you are, sissyboi?Cannonpointer » 28 Dec 2025, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Again with the leftist talking points.
I call **** on the tranny agenda and those who push it; you respond by questioning my manhood.
You have CLEARLY studied your Saul Alinksy, leftist fruitcake.
Yes, yes - opposing the tranny agenda is "insecurity." Going along with it is manly, Major Burns.
THERE ya go, fruity. The reason people oppose the tranny agenda is because they are afraid they are secretly trannies.
You have your Saul Alinsky talking points down pat, fruitcake.![]()
![]()
Wow. Sorry to hear that, bro.Zeets2 » 30 Dec 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Have you ANY clue at all what a droning bore you are, sissyboi?