Liberal Forum

Matt Walsh argued that 16 year old girls should get pregnant because it is“when they're at their most fertile.” I’m not joking please google it.

     

Ok ok, I'll **** the *** and the chinks but I don't want the Irish!

LowIQTrash » 20 Dec 2025, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2025, 3:21 pm

   

For most of man's history women [up until the early 1900s] routinely gave birth as teens and I would think you knew this...?
I just asked Google about when a woman is most "productive" and this is what it said....."A woman's egg production is at its highest during her teenage years and early 20s, when she has the most immature egg follicles available. Fertility begins to decline significantly in the early 30s and continues to decrease as she ages."
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Dec 2025, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2025, 5:14 pm

."A woman's egg production is at its highest during her teenage years and early 20s, when she has the most immature egg follicles available. Fertility begins to decline significantly in the early 30s and continues to decrease as she ages."

So to avoid pregnancy wait until they're old ladies. Got it and thank you.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Dec 2025, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2025, 5:14 pm

For most of man's history women [up until the early 1900s] routinely gave birth as teens and I would think you knew this...?
I just asked Google about when a woman is most "productive" and this is what it said....."A woman's egg production is at its highest during her teenage years and early 20s, when she has the most immature egg follicles available. Fertility begins to decline significantly in the early 30s and continues to decrease as she ages."

I KNOW, I was laughing b/c th3 comments underneath went hysterical   

LowIQTrash » 20 Dec 2025, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2025, 5:26 pm

I KNOW, I was laughing b/c th3 comments underneath went hysterical 

Ooops......I thought there might be something I was missing....I'll go take a look at the "comedy gold" in the comments section.    

Merry Christmas and please keep your great insights and bold forecasts coming in.   
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Dec 2025, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2025, 5:33 pm

Ooops......I thought there might be something I was missing....I'll go take a look at the "comedy gold" in the comments section.    

Merry Christmas and please keep your great insights and bold forecasts coming in. 

I gotta tell ya.  That Somali woman is not going to throw that discus very far with it trapped in her lower lip.

Maybe someone should say something to their Olympic Committee?

youtu.be/VGM43B_kyxk?si=pVoHKN6gcJQ5JzoG


 

LowIQTrash » 20 Dec 2025, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2025, 3:21 pm

:rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

Your constant denial of all you were since conceived makes me laugh at you constantly trying to tear everyone else's character role down to subhuman intellectual scale of navigating space self evidently here since arrived one's specific chromosomes conceived to decomposed so far.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Dec 2025, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2025, 5:14 pm

For most of man's history women [up until the early 1900s] routinely gave birth as teens and I would think you knew this...?
I just asked Google about when a woman is most "productive" and this is what it said....."A woman's egg production is at its highest during her teenage years and early 20s, when she has the most immature egg follicles available. Fertility begins to decline significantly in the early 30s and continues to decrease as she ages."

And lived pretty miserable lives.


Apparently many women don't find the consequences appealing.

 

Blackvegetable » 21 Dec 2025, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 9:20 am

And lived pretty miserable lives.

Apparently many women don't find the consequences appealing.

There is a grave stone in St Michaels from the 1700's
Rebecca, Dead at Age 15. Mother of Three.

The truth was the consequences back in the day.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Dec 2025, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 9:20 am

And lived pretty miserable lives.

Apparently many women don't find the consequences appealing.

People like you  would have been just as miserable as you are now regardless of the era you lived in.  
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 10:01 am

People like you  would have been just as miserable as you are now regardless of the era you lived in.

If you have any daughters, do they speak to you?

JohnnyYou » 21 Dec 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 9:26 am

There is a grave stone in St Michaels from the 1700's
Rebecca, Dead at Age 15. Mother of Three.

The truth was the consequences back in the day.

She was nearly halfway through her life...

AI says:
Search Assist
In the 1700s, the average life expectancy was around 37 years in England and similar regions, largely due to high infant mortality rates and diseases. However, those who survived childhood could expect to live into their 50s or 60s
.

DeezerShoove » 21 Dec 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 10:16 am

She was nearly halfway through her life...

AI says:
Search Assist
In the 1700s, the average life expectancy was around 37 years in England and similar regions, largely due to high infant mortality rates and diseases. However, those who survived childhood could expect to live into their 50s or 60s
.

Baby Boomers gotta die.  They are hording value.  This means me.
 

Johnny You » 21 Dec 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 10:19 am

Baby Boomers gotta die.  They are hording value.  This means me.
 

Simply die as that is a free will choice to escape humanity's induced eternal hell governance of relative time logistics.

JohnnyYou » 21 Dec 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 10:19 am

Baby Boomers gotta die.  They are hording value.  This means me.

No need to worry. Everybody dies. So what?
Generation after generation loathes the previous.
Mankind hates itself. Look at yourself for conformation.

DeezerShoove » 21 Dec 2025, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 4:27 pm

No need to worry. Everybody dies. So what?
Generation after generation loathes the previous.
Mankind hates itself. Look at yourself for conformation.

It's best to be stupid I guess.  Few make it to the enlightenment.
 

JohnnyYou » 21 Dec 2025, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 7:30 pm

It's best to be stupid I guess.  Few make it to the enlightenment.

Enlightenment is fiction feelgood.

DeezerShoove » 21 Dec 2025, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 7:34 pm

Enlightenment is fiction feelgood.

I am hearing it may be possible to actually reverse entropy at the quantum level and break thelaws of thermodynamics.

We were discussing shorter life spans this morning.  Certianly technological enlightment has brought longer more fulffiling lives to a heck of lot more served daily.

You are young. I did not get into the valley of despair on the Dunning Kruger unitl my mid 50's. I still go backwards up Mt Stupid a lot and feel stuck in that rut. It sounds like you are starting to wander in that valley.  I sure think most of humanity is. The Dalai Lama sure seems to be a happy dude. Stay focused on what brings joy to you and those around you. 

 
 

JohnnyYou » 21 Dec 2025, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2025, 7:30 pm

It's best to be stupid I guess.  Few make it to the enlightenment.