Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The Photograph:
The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
I will follow up your **** with this every single time. Enjoy.Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The Photograph:
The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
About the claim itselfVanity Fair could be wrong, and a caption alone is not proof.Here’s the key point, stated plainly:
- Over the years, various outlets and social-media posts have circulated photos from 1980s–1990s New York society events and charity galas where guests wore elaborate costumes or drag as part of themed parties.
- Some publications (including Vanity Fair, in commentary pieces rather than forensic reports) have reported or repeated claims that a person in one such photo was Trump, often citing second-hand accounts or party anecdotes—not conclusive proof.
- No independently verified, primary-source confirmation (e.g., Trump acknowledging it, event records explicitly naming him in that costume, or contemporaneous reporting) has ever settled the matter definitively.
A magazine caption is not evidence. It’s an editorial assertion, and those can be mistaken—especially for old party photos with costumes and incomplete records.A few important clarifications:1. Captions are not fact-checked like investigative reporting2. Vanity Fair has editorial credibility — but not infallibility
- Captions are often written by editors using:
- prior anecdotes,
- social-circle lore,
- secondhand attributions,
- or assumptions repeated from earlier commentary.
- They usually do not cite primary verification unless the piece itself is an investigation.
3. Why this specific claim remains weak
- VF is reputable in culture, fashion, and commentary, not forensic identification.
- They are not immune to errors, especially in retrospective society gossip from the 1980s–90s.
- A caption saying “this is X” does not mean:
- the person confirmed it,
- the identity was verified,
- or that documentation exists.
So the correct epistemic status of the claim is:
- No contemporaneous reporting from the event identifying him that way
- No on-record confirmation from Trump or the event organizers
- No multiple independent primary sources backing the claim
- The photo itself provides no verifiable identifiers, especially given costume, makeup, lighting, and angle
That’s very different from “proven,” and it’s completely reasonable to be skeptical—especially if the visual resemblance doesn’t persuade you.“Asserted by a publication, but not independently established.”
Post your prompt...
And you will indict yourself, every timeVegas » 23 Dec 2025, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I will follow up your **** with this every single time. Enjoy.
Post your promt...caption alone is not proof
Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ And you will indict yourself, every time
Post your promt...
His OP bitch-slapped you.Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ MODS!
THIS THREAD IS YET ANOTHER MISERABLE FAILURE FROM @Vegas . HE MUST BE MADE TO PAY FOR THE **** OF HIS CONTRIBUTIONS...
THROW HIM OUT.
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
My bad...
Your self-flagellation should be celebrated by every moron on this site....JohnnyYou, rKelly, J-Rab...give your fellow moron some support.Blackvegetable » 24 Dec 2025, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑ My bad...
I forgot that the two of you are just as **** stupid as he is...
LAUGH, PEOPLE!RebelGator » 24 Dec 2025, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ Your self-flagellation should be celebrated by every moron on this site....JohnnyYou, rKelly, J-Rab...give your fellow moron some support.
If you can recruit one more player, your group can form a basketball team and qualify for the Special Olympics.....not quite like the Dream Team, but entertaining none the less.
Trump is not "in drag", you **** idiot..JohnnyYou » 22 Dec 2025, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑ It's a Vanity Fair... It's a Family Affair..
Great Work Vegasina.
If you look real close at the photo you might see BV shop'd in a close up of your pubic hairs in Trump's nose.
you don't even have to zoom in.. Just ask GROK.
You have no inside the beltway experience.. Consider yourself lucky.
"Self-flagellation" is YOUR sport.RebelGator » 24 Dec 2025, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ Your self-flagellation should be celebrated by every moron on this site....JohnnyYou, rKelly, J-Rab...give your fellow moron some support.
If you can recruit one more player, your group can form a basketball team and qualify for the Special Olympics.....not quite like the Dream Team, but entertaining none the less.
Damn BV, I am not picking a Toga Food Fight Party with you.Blackvegetable » 24 Dec 2025, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ Trump is not "in drag", you **** idiot..
He's in a tunic.
call someone who cares...Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The Photograph:
The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.


JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom No...not once...ROG62 » 24 Dec 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ call someone who cares...
you've been handily put to bed, twice...

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Ignorance is practiced by choice,Blackvegetable » 24 Dec 2025, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑ My bad...
I forgot that the two of you are just as **** stupid as he is...
This matter has been resolved.
here are the results of facial recognition matches...Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Answer the question, Slizz...then we can determine its relevance.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom At least he wasn't "raped"...Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ You were digitally penetrated by them..
How tall was Epstein?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom