cow ^^^^^^^ patties. Had you destroyed him, he wouldn't be posting anymore.
Trump was 33 in 79. The guy in the pic is not 33. Below is trump in 1979:Blackvegetable » 24 Dec 2025, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ How can people be this **** stupid?
The Photograph:
The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
What is so hard to grasp?

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2025, 10:57 pm » wrote: ↑ SlackVegetable would have us believe that, like him, the demo rat party HAD this explosive photo of young donnie trump playing the catamite of a guy that looked exactly like hitler if hitler had looked exactly like the devil, but they were too classy to use it.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom that's ****...the caption was his proof...Vegas » 24 Dec 2025, 11:09 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable has reached a whole new level of bitterness. He actually said that he never used the VF caption as evidence that was Trump.
Such a **** idiot.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The boi in brown's photo is in his early 20's at best...Huey » 26 Dec 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Trump was 33 in 79. The guy in the pic is not 33. Below is trump in 1979:
It is not Trump in your picture
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom It appears he is the fool.ROG62 » 26 Dec 2025, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑The boi in brown's photo is in his early 20's at best...Huey » 26 Dec 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Trump was 33 in 79. The guy in the pic is not 33. Below is trump in 1979:
It is not Trump in your picture
Hey Huey....how many years did BV post that photo at the tail end of his failed arguments before he finally worked up the courage to tell us it was supposedly a picture of "Gay Trump"...?
*GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Dec 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey Huey....how many years did BV post that photo at the tail end of his failed arguments before he finally worked up the courage to tell us it was supposedly a picture of "Gay Trump"...?
OK...but IIRC he posted that photo for the longest time and the only reaction it ever got was NO REACTION....JUST PUZZLED LOOKS from the sane forum members who happened to be looking in.
AIVegas » 22 Dec 2025, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Since BV only reads like 5 words, this is way too long for him, so I will break it down:
VF made an editorial assertion, not a caption based on evidence. In other words, neither BV nor VF can prove that it is Trump any more than it can be proved that it isn't.
**** moron.
You shuffle around day after day like a retarded child, insisting that you have a "Gay Trump" photo and yet you think I am the one who's an idiot......Blackvegetable » 26 Dec 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ AI
The Photograph:
The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
******* Toadies
"I spy with my little eye...."
Blackvegetable » 26 Dec 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑AIVegas » 22 Dec 2025, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Since BV only reads like 5 words, this is way too long for him, so I will break it down:
VF made an editorial assertion, not a caption based on evidence. In other words, neither BV nor VF can prove that it is Trump any more than it can be proved that it isn't.
**** moron.
The Photograph:
The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
******* Toadies
"I spy with my little eye...."
Huey » 26 Dec 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑Trump was 33 in 79. The guy in the pic is not 33. Below is trump in 1979:Blackvegetable » 24 Dec 2025, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ How can people be this **** stupid?
The Photograph:
The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
What is so hard to grasp?
It is not Trump in your picture
his **** knows no bounds...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 26 Dec 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ AI
The Photograph:
The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
******* Toadies
"I spy with my little eye...."
Why this specific claim remains weakSo the correct epistemic status of the claim is:“Asserted by a publication, but not independently established.”That’s very different from “proven,” and it’s completely reasonable to be skeptical—especially if the visual resemblance doesn’t persuade you.
- No contemporaneous reporting from the event identifying him that way
- No on-record confirmation from Trump or the event organizers
- No multiple independent primary sources backing the claim
- The photo itself provides no verifiable identifiers, especially given costume, makeup, lighting, and angle
AI is trash.Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2025, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ @Cedar
@ROG62
@Cannonpointer
@GHETTO BLASTER
@*MankyLittleSkidmark
Here's what AI ACTUALLY says about THAT photo
AI Overview
Yes, the attribution is highly credible. The still image used in the documentary
Where's My Roy Cohn? is a legitimate, widely-cited photograph taken by Mariette Pathy Allen.The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.
- Mariette Pathy Allen's Credibility: Allen is a highly respected and pioneering photographer known for her extensive documentation of the transgender and gender-variant communities over nearly five decades. Her work is in the permanent collections of major museums like the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) and the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and her archives are held at Duke University. She is a credible and authoritative documentary photographer.
- The Photograph: The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
- The Documentary's Use: The image is used as a factual representation of the well-documented mentor-mentee relationship between Cohn and Trump during the 1970s and 1980s.
Cheddy,
If you had watched the movie you would have known that the date on the newspaper that the picture was from predates Trump meeting Cohn. It will only cost you $2 on YouTube.Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ Cheddy,
Remember when you became so desperate you tried to convince everyone you had watched the movie....
Give it up, Cheddy...Cedar » 14 Jan 2026, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ If you had watched the movie you would have known that the date on the newspaper that the picture was from predates Trump meeting Cohn. It will only cost you $2 on YouTube.
Instead you chose to continually act like a retard.
Still that doesn’t change the fact that AI is trash, it’s nothing more than an aggregator of available information, whether that information is accurate or not.
GIGO