But you're an idiot.
As they should, but that doesn’t change the fact that the picture was taken before Trump met Cohn.
It's obviously a "mock up".Cedar » 14 Jan 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ As they should, but that doesn’t change the fact that the picture was taken before Trump met Cohn.
THe paper was from 1972 but it couldn't have been at Studio 54. It didn't open until 77.Cedar » 14 Jan 2026, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑More AI trash, the photo was from Studio 54, retard.Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ The Photograph: The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
"Not THAT blue!"
Deal:Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ It's obviously a "mock up".
VF had to pay to use the image...and attribute the photographer...
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
That screenshot was taken directly from the movie “Where’s My Roy Cohn.” The movie the VF article was reporting on. If the picture is bogus one could disregard anything else in the movie, to include the VF article reporting it.Huey » 14 Jan 2026, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ THe paper was from 1972 but it couldn't have been at Studio 54. It didn't open until 77.
The photographer has never said it was Trump, VF was the first to make the claim.Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ It's obviously a "mock up".
VF had to pay to use the image...and attribute the photographer...
I trust that trump IS NOT in the pic. The location could have been Le Club. It couldn't have been Studio 54.Cedar » 14 Jan 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑That screenshot was taken directly from the movie “Where’s My Roy Cohn.” The movie the VF article was reporting on. If the picture is bogus one could disregard anything else in the movie, to include the VF article reporting it.Huey » 14 Jan 2026, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ THe paper was from 1972 but it couldn't have been at Studio 54. It didn't open until 77.
Cedar » 14 Jan 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ The photographer has never said it was Trump, VF was the first to make the claim.
Has she said it isn't?Cedar » 14 Jan 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ The photographer has never said it was Trump, VF was the first to make the claim.
C'mon, Cheddy...VF was the first to make the claim.
"The paper" is unlikely to exist.Huey » 14 Jan 2026, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ THe paper was from 1972 but it couldn't have been at Studio 54. It didn't open until 77.
Deal:Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ "The paper" is unlikely to exist.
But thank you for driving the final spike into that ****.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Can you identfy the person in the Gladiator Costume Perry Mason? It surre looks like Young Trump and he looks scared as shyt.
It’s OK if you still want to touch yourself to the picture, but it isn’t Trump.
Cheddy,Cedar » 14 Jan 2026, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ It’s OK if you still want to touch yourself to the picture, but it isn’t Trump.
Turns out the 1972 "info" is bogus...JohnnyYou » 14 Jan 2026, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Can you identfy the person in the Gladiator Costume Perry Mason? It surre looks like Young Trump and he looks scared as shyt.
The movie makers sem to have thought it was him.. Trump did hang with Cohn in 1972.
Like I said, AI indicated it appeared to be consistent with Trump on inquiry. I did not know the 1972 information..
The VF article was, I’m just fine.Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Cheddy,
You were just brutally taintpunted.......by huey.
Think about that...
You now have absolutely nothing.