Liberal Forum

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:04 am

LOL!  ANd yet you have only been able to provide ONE source that claims it is his.

You have zero.

What is the difference between a caption and an attribution?

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:07 am

You have zero.

What is the difference between a caption and an attribution?

what is the definition of a woman?

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:07 am

You have zero.

What is the difference between a caption and an attribution?

 

Will you be answering questions on a one for one basis?

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:21 am

Will you be answering questions on a one for one basis?

:rofl:  

Run.

Vegas » 22 Dec 2025, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2025, 4:52 pm

Since BV only reads like 5 words, this is way too long for him, so I will break it down:

VF made an editorial assertion, not a caption based on evidence. In other words, neither BV nor VF can prove that it is Trump any more than it can be proved that it isn't. 

**** moron. 

Post your prompt...

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:23 am

 

Run.

 

Just before your August hissy fit I had proven I am more than capable of answering your questions.  

And running ain't my bag anymore.  Bad knees.  

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:54 am

Just before your August hissy fit I had proven

In the retelling, you're tall and dashing.

In reality you are @*MankyLittleSkidmark.


As the record makes crystal clear.

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:01 am

In the retelling, you're tall and dashing.

In reality you are @*MankyLittleSkidmark.


As the record makes crystal clear.

 

 

The deal is the same.  You will be able to ask as many questions as you like as long as you answer one for each you ask.

Not sure why YOU are running.  

PS.  I am a 60 year old man.  Your HS locker room insults have no effect on me. 

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:07 am

The deal is the same.  

Stop right there....


 

Nah.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:11 am

Stop right there....


 

 

You forgot some:

The deal is the same.  You will be able to ask as many questions as you like as long as you answer one for each you ask.

Not sure why YOU are running.  

PS.  I am a 60 year old man.  Your HS locker room insults have no effect on me. 
 

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:24 am

You forgot some:


 

You, a congenital zero integrity coward, may not dictate terms or conditions.

The short reason is because they won't apply to you.

I've posted examples....not narratives...

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:31 am

You, a congenital zero integrity coward, may not dictate terms or conditions.

The short reason is because they won't apply to you.

I've posted examples....not narratives...

 

You still have forgotten some

One for one one.  And yes, it will apply to me.  As he did right before your hissy fit in August.


 

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:33 am

You 

It's not about me.

You need to understand this...

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:35 am

It's not about me.

You need to understand this...

 

 

Actually, it is about YOU.  YOU need to start acting like a grow man.  
 

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:36 am

Actually, it 

No, it isn't. 


I've posted numerous examples of your

Rules for thee.....what rule?


pathology.

All you have is narrative.

You can't do anything about being a slack jawed *******, but you can try to muster a bit of integrity.
 

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:36 am

Actually, it is about YOU.  YOU need to start acting like a grow man.  
 

 

Actually, it is about YOU.  YOU need to start acting like a grow man.  

Keep on melting down.

Questions will be answered on a one for one basis.  Hell, you are so weak you couldn't even give one definition for an assault weapon from the many out there.


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:39 am

No, it isn't. 


I've posted numerous examples of your

Rules for thee.....what rule?


pathology.

All you have is narrative.

You can't do anything about being a slack jawed *******, but you can try to muster a bit of integrity.
 

 

Actually, it is about YOU.  YOU need to start acting like a grow man.  

The thread has been bumped.

viewtopic.php?p=2787183#p2787183

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:42 am

Actually, it is about YOU.  

It's about your sorry history, @*...as reflected in the record.

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 9:48 am

It's about your sorry history, @*...as reflected in the record.

 

As I said, questions will be answered on a one for one basis.  take it or leave it.