Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:20 am

Trump Announces New ‘Trump Class’ of Warships The president said development of the vessels would help maintain military superiority and improve the industrial base, but analysts suggested they were the wrong approach to current threats

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/22/us/p ... ships.html

Naffy, you ***..

Yell at it.

 

You people are so **** g'ddammned stupid

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 10:42 am

No need.  I am you have a point and are about to make it.

nefarious101 » 23 Dec 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 10:54 am

Hey Dickhead....

Did Trump, who's such a narcissist, post pics of himself half naked on a political forum multiple times wanting people to rate him?


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:18 am

With those low T arms? And he was in his "prime"....

nefarious101 » 23 Dec 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:22 am

Translation....the dickhead is still triggered

Cha-Ching

SouthernFried » 23 Dec 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:30 am

Remember when the Democrats named a ship after *** Harvey Milk? 

nefarious101 » 23 Dec 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:22 am

Translation....the dickhead is still triggered

Cha-Ching

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:49 am

Read it again, you hopelessly stupid piece of ****.

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:20 am

Trump Announces New ‘Trump Class’ of Warships The president said development of the vessels would help maintain military superiority and improve the industrial base, but analysts suggested they were the wrong approach to current threats

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/22/us/p ... ships.html

Naffy, you ***..

Yell at it.

 

You people are so **** g'ddammned stupid

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Huey » 23 Dec 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:55 am

They already did.  Get with the program.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:18 am

With those low T arms? And he was in his "prime"....

About the claim itself

• Over the years, various outlets and social-media posts have circulated photos from 1980s–1990s New York society events and charity galas where guests wore elaborate costumes or drag as part of themed parties.
• Some publications (including Vanity Fair, in commentary pieces rather than forensic reports) have reported or repeated claims that a person in one such photo was Trump, often citing second-hand accounts or party anecdotes—not conclusive proof.
• No independently verified, primary-source confirmation (e.g., Trump acknowledging it, event records explicitly naming him in that costume, or contemporaneous reporting) has ever settled the matter definitively.

Vanity Fair could be wrong, and a caption alone is not proof.Here’s the key point, stated plainly:
 A magazine caption is not evidence. It’s an editorial assertion, and those can be mistaken—especially for old party photos with costumes and incomplete records.A few important clarifications:1. Captions are not fact-checked like investigative reporting

• Captions are often written by editors using:
  • prior anecdotes,
  • social-circle lore,
  • secondhand attributions,
  • or assumptions repeated from earlier commentary.
• They usually do not cite primary verification unless the piece itself is an investigation.

2. Vanity Fair has editorial credibility — but not infallibility

• VF is reputable in culture, fashion, and commentary, not forensic identification.
• They are not immune to errors, especially in retrospective society gossip from the 1980s–90s.
• A caption saying “this is X” does not mean:
  • the person confirmed it,
  • the identity was verified,
  • or that documentation exists.

3. Why this specific claim remains weak

• No contemporaneous reporting from the event identifying him that way
• No on-record confirmation from Trump or the event organizers
• No multiple independent primary sources backing the claim
• The photo itself provides no verifiable identifiers, especially given costume, makeup, lighting, and angle

So the correct epistemic status of the claim is:

“Asserted by a publication, but not independently established.”

That’s very different from “proven,” and it’s completely reasonable to be skeptical—especially if the visual resemblance doesn’t persuade you.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:36 am

Go sweep up the bits and pieces of your shattered skull....

JohnnyYou » 23 Dec 2025, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:54 am

So how much do you get paid  for being a moronic mercenary here?  Keyboard Commando witha load in his pants!

nefarious101 » 23 Dec 2025, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 5:23 pm

Wow....dickhead....you are really on your game

**** bitter as ****....can hardly even grunt out a response

SouthernFried » 23 Dec 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 8:30 am

Remember when the Democrats named a ship after *** Harvey Milk? 

JohnnyYou » 23 Dec 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 11:53 am

 Harvey Milk was more than gay man.  

 

RebelGator » 23 Dec 2025, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Dec 2025, 5:51 pm

You're right, he was also a pedophile.