You are the poster who once used the screen name Iceberg Slim. He was a convicted felon, drug dealer and abuser of women as well as a pimp. You have no right to call someone a moron.Blackvegetable » 25 Dec 2025, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑Vegas » 24 Dec 2025, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Here *******. Watch this. You see the pic below. That is unmistakingly Trump. No doubt. Here is my prompt to AI:
Prompt: "Attribute this pic as Trump"
It's reply:
I can’t attribute this image as Donald Trump.
I can describe the image, but I can’t verify or confirm the identity of the person shown.
Yet, your ******* wrote a confirmation in your AI response. You thought I wouldn't bust you. BUSTED!
This is a **** moron."Attribute this pic as Trump"
Doesn't understand the definition of "to attribute" and butchers another preposition.
AI doesn't want to read your ****.
No one does.
I don't know Huey...that weather map Bv keeps posting could be the difference in 2028...or 3028.Huey » 25 Dec 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ One of the first signs you are triggered, BallLess Wonder.
Here, let's go to thread where you were given an epic curbstomping.
He was actually wrong. My preposition was correct and his was wrong. He accused me of using the wrong preposition, though it was correct, so he corrected me with the wrong preposition, then called me a moron.Huey » 25 Dec 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ You are the poster who once used the screen name Iceberg Slim. He was a convicted felon, pic, drug dealer and abuser of women as well as a pimp. You have no right to call someone a moron.
roadkill » 25 Dec 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know Huey...that weather map Bv keeps posting could be the difference in 2028...or 3028.
![]()
![]()

My point, exactly....which is why I ridiculed your prompt.Vegas » 25 Dec 2025, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ You being proved wrong is triggering Mary, so I need to make a point to continue with it. Here you go:
Even AI said you are wrong you illiterate *******: What “to attribute” actually means
To attribute means:
Examples:In photography:
- “The quote is attributed to Mark Twain.”
- “The painting is attributed to Rembrandt.”
- “The error was attributed to human oversight.”
So you can say:
- You attribute a photo to the photographer, not the subject.
- “The photo is attributed to Mariette Pathy Allen.”
But not:- “The photo is attributed to Trump.” (unless Trump took the photo)
You're as **** stupid as he is..roadkill » 25 Dec 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know Huey...that weather map Bv keeps posting could be the difference in 2028...or 3028.
![]()
![]()
No Bsharpie...I don't wonder about the top of yer head.Blackvegetable » 25 Dec 2025, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You're as **** stupid as he is..
You don't wonder about THE **** SHARPIE either.
This is because you are idiots.
What do you believe it says, PedoStool?
I think it's one that everybody has wiped their *** with.Beekeeper » 26 Dec 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ Our boy @Blackvegetable is cut from a different cloth.
One that NO ONE would wipe their *** WITH!!
I remember that **** on .org, chest all puffed out playing tough guy...he couldn't last but half a day as he always got his deflated sorry *** ridden out on a rail in a few posts...Huey » 25 Dec 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ You are the poster who once used the screen name Iceberg Slim. He was a convicted felon, pic, drug dealer and abuser of women as well as a pimp. You have no right to call someone a moron.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom It's a natural progression...nefarious101 » 25 Dec 2025, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ I knew about his bed wetting problem but he **** himself too??
Must be some kind of educated idiot fetish he learned while at....Brown?...eeeeewww...now it's all starting to make sense
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I remember him as R. Suave. He also went by "The5thHorseman" but I don't think he used it here. I called him The5thJackasss.ROG62 » 26 Dec 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑I remember that **** on .org, chest all puffed out playing tough guy...he couldn't last but half a day as he always got his deflated sorry *** ridden out on a rail in a few posts...Huey » 25 Dec 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ You are the poster who once used the screen name Iceberg Slim. He was a convicted felon, pic, drug dealer and abuser of women as well as a pimp. You have no right to call someone a moron.
and don't forget this other great choice...
I think it's his "Gay Trump" photo that will inflict the most damage on Trumps chances for re-election......roadkill » 25 Dec 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know Huey...that weather map Bv keeps posting could be the difference in 2028...or 3028.
![]()
![]()

so what's your **** point? did the picture taker guy state it was DJT to substantiate your claim? He'd be the only credible witness....dig him up and put this to bed...Blackvegetable » 25 Dec 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ My point, exactly....which is why I ridiculed your prompt.
You attribute a photo to the photographer, not the subject.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom We thought the Minnesota $9 Billion FRAUD problem was BIG... BUT NOW, it's looking like California's FRAUD problem is MUCH bigger !! $76-$78 BILLION, and it appears to be GROWING... Below... 1) The actual Auditor Report, 2) A couple reports on the subject, and 3) a NEWSMAX report laying out what we know NOW !!Blackvegetable » 24 Dec 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency said it made more than 29,000 cuts to the federal government — slashing billion-dollar contracts, canceling thousands of grants and pushing out civil servants.
But the group did not do what Mr. Musk said it would: reduce federal spending by $1 trillion before October. On DOGE’s watch, federal spending did not go down at all. It went up.
At the top were two Defense Department contracts, one for information technology, one for aircraft maintenance. Mr. Musk’s group listed them as “terminations,” and said their demise had saved taxpayers $7.9 billion. That was not true. The contracts are still alive and well, and those savings were an accounting mirage. Together, those two false entries were bigger than 25,000 of DOGE’s other claims combined.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/us/p ... roid-share
You MAGAt rubes are so g'ddammned **** stupid.
5