Vegas » 25 Dec 2025, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
↓
↓newGH07 Copia 2
Kill yourself.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Look @Blackvegetable I have clearly proved that this is not going anywhere until you answer. If you aren't convinced of that by now, then you are dumber than I thought.
This will always be a win-win for me and a lose-lose for you.
1. Of course you will continue with the same lies.
Post the question you insist remains unanswered.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh...sooooo you did answer the question then?
Show me. Show all of us.
I'll admit you are turning this place into a giant ****** hole V Man.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
@Mrkelly @Johnny You will you please now admit that this guy is one dumb mother ****. Even you two know the question that has remained unanswered and it isn't even directed at either of you.
Ask BV. He needs to defend it also. So spewing out the letter isn't enough.JohnnyYou » 02 Jan 2026, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll admit you are turning this place into a giant ****** hole V Man.
It's 2026.. Can we please set the survivability to C and See it out to the troll pasture it belongs in?
This is No Holds Barred.. You don't always get what you want.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 7:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Ask BV. He needs to defend it also. So spewing out the letter isn't enough.
Providence...JohnnyYou » 02 Jan 2026, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Question for the @Blackvegetable
Do you have any faith in anything?
Either post it, or **** off.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ You are literally on the very OP of the question. Holy ****. You are one stupid mother ****.
Just stupid. I am speechless. The level of stupid...it's...there are no words.
Yes. And this is the beauty of why it's a win-win for me. I don't need him to answer the question. I don't care if he does or not. When he evades, then he is humiliating himself. If he answers, then he will get his *** handed to him.JohnnyYou » 02 Jan 2026, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑ This is No Holds Barred.. You don't always get what you want.
All I see is homo chromozoidnal annoyance in 47 parallel Origasmic Folds V.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes. And this is the beauty of why it's a win-win for me. I don't need him to answer the question. I don't care if he does or not. When he evades, then he is humiliating himself. If he answers, then he will get his *** handed to him.
Think of it like this. Someone like Mike Tyson challenges a moron to get in the ring with him after that moron trolls incessantly for years and years. But the moron never does. He chickens out every single time. The people look at him as a coward and a complete moron with the IQ of a frog. Now let's assume the moron gets in the ring. Well...Tyson will beat him to a pulp within 5 seconds. So either way, Tyson will come out ahead.
It's the same principle here.
@Blackvegetable
Why not just post it?Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
@Mrkelly @Johnny You will you please now admit that this guy is one dumb mother ****. Even you two know the question that has remained unanswered and it isn't even directed at either of you.
Why not stop pretending that you don't know the question?
This whole OP demonstrates that you don't answer questions. I also just demonstrated that I only answer questions from people who answer mine. You don't answer my questions. Thus, you are not owed answers.
1. Just stop..pic...yeah yeah yeah...either prove you answered the first time or go **** yourself already
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=99641Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes. And this is the beauty of why it's a win-win for me. I don't need him to answer the question. I don't care if he does or not. When he evades, then he is humiliating himself. If he answers, then he will get his *** handed to him.
Think of it like this. Someone like Mike Tyson challenges a moron to get in the ring with him after that moron trolls incessantly for years and years. But the moron never does. He chickens out every single time. The people look at him as a coward and a complete moron with the IQ of a frog. Now let's assume the moron gets in the ring. Well...Tyson will beat him to a pulp within 5 seconds. So either way, Tyson will come out ahead.
It's the same principle here.
@Blackvegetable