Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Question for Blackvegetable
Question for Blackvegetable
By Vegas
25 Dec 2025 2:02 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
2 Jan 2026 6:47 pm
Why not stop pretending you haven't acknowledged that I answered it?Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Why not stop pretending that you don't know the question?
God, you narcissists are such losers.
Watch how easy you are. ready, here we go:
1. You will now say that you demonstrated that I don't answer questions. Then I will remind you of this conversation we already had:
2 Jan 2026 6:48 pm
Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2026, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Why not stop pretending you haven't acknowledged that I answered it?
Waiting for the evidence.
1. Of course, the same lies.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 6:48 pm
Didn't click it.
Are these my words?
I will not entertain your stalking.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 6:49 pm
Shake the BlackVegetable Centric Universe!!
Smoke the Peaches.. and the Herb!
youtu.be/e-LeujZNV08?si=RzMYy91XT0YhIq5g
Smoke the Peaches.. and the Herb!
youtu.be/e-LeujZNV08?si=RzMYy91XT0YhIq5g
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
2 Jan 2026 6:50 pm
Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2026, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Why not stop pretending you haven't acknowledged that I answered it?
Ahhhhh look at that. You just admitted that you know what the question is after all. No reposting necessary.
idiot.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 7:27 pm
Now admit that you have acknowledged that I've answered it.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Ahhhhh look at that. You just admitted that you know what the question is after all. No reposting necessary.
idiot.
2 Jan 2026 7:29 pm
If you won't read your ****, why should anyone else?
2 Jan 2026 7:42 pm
Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2026, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ If you won't read your ****, why should anyone else?
Yeah, we already went through this also. Same old ****. Does this look familiar yet?
Any of this ^^^ ring a bell?I will not entertain your stalking.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 7:42 pm
Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2026, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Now admit that you have acknowledged that I've answered it.
You have not answered it and you know you haven't.
This will continue until you do.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 7:53 pm
I show you acknowledging that I've answered it and you leave for 5 years.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You have not answered it and you know you haven't.
This will continue until you do.
Deal?
2 Jan 2026 7:54 pm
And you keep demonstrating a reluctance to read your own ****.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, we already went through this also. Same old ****. Does this look familiar yet?
Any of this ^^^ ring a bell?
What's your point?
2 Jan 2026 7:56 pm
Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2026, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑ And you keep demonstrating a reluctance to read your own ****.
What's your point?
I guess you need to have a bare minimum of level 2 to be able to infer why this comment explains why I don't click it.
At least try to use both of your neurons.I will not entertain your stalking.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 8:01 pm
That doesn't make sense on any level, Stalker.Vegas » 02 Jan 2026, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I guess you need to have a bare minimum of level 2 to be able to infer why this comment explains why I don't click it.
At least try to use both of your neurons.
2 Jan 2026 8:06 pm
Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2026, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I show you acknowledging that I've answered it and you leave for 5 years.
Deal?
Holy ****!!!!! You mean you are finally taking the deal? You bet. I accept.
Here is the deal that you have been presented with:
Deal:
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
@Cannonpointer @Deezer Shoove the coward finally accepted the deal. Let's get this going.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 8:07 pm
Like I said. You need to have at least a bare minimum of level 2+ thinking. We both know that you are level 0.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 8:11 pm
This is the part where @Blackvegetable demand that he be the judge. 
Moron. So God damn **** stupid.
Moron. So God damn **** stupid.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 8:23 pm
You acknowledged it, and you leave for 5 years.
Deal?
2 Jan 2026 8:39 pm
**** you jigaboo!Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2026, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ You acknowledged it, and you leave for 5 years.
Deal?
2 Jan 2026 9:05 pm
**** your usual semantics and word splitting. I have never fallen for that ****. Do this deal. NOW!!!Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2026, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ You acknowledged it, and you leave for 5 years.
Deal?
Here is the deal that you have been presented with:
Deal:
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
2 Jan 2026 9:06 pm
Nate Higgers was the very first negro ever drafted by the NFL to earn a NEGATIVE WONDERLIC IQ TEST SCORE....NateHiggas » 02 Jan 2026, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Speaking of predictions, can you predict when you will be stopping this stupid **** ****?
This was such an embarrassment for the NFL that they completely did away testing their athletes to see if they are intelligent enough to know if their team is either....
ahead or behind.....
or if their team has the ball or not...
or even to be able to understand that IT IS NOT OK to jump into the stands stark naked and rape .the first White Woman that gives him the urge to "get his groove on" nsheeet...!!!
Who is online
In total there are 6872 users online :: 10 registered, 17 bots, and 6845 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole
Bots: NING, TTD-Content, okhttp, ADmantX, CensysInspect, GPTBot, Bolt, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, proximic, YandexBot, Applebot, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot, Baiduspider