Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Question for Blackvegetable
Question for Blackvegetable
By Vegas
25 Dec 2025 2:02 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
3 Jan 2026 1:40 am
Your track is empty, fruitcake. No train to rule.JohnnyYou » 02 Jan 2026, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑ This is No Holds Barred.. You don't always get what you want.
Look at Me in the Shunning of the Five..
Stifling human minds is easy. You don't even need Artificial Intelligence. Just get an @Cannonpointer and he'll rule your train of thought
youtu.be/qlywcuw-1TU?si=lbvSgdp2FbUG7O5I
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Jan 2026 4:02 am
Work arounds as I can.
Yeah, you definitely have taking the keys to the car man.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
3 Jan 2026 5:30 am
Keep it simple.
You leave for 5 years...
3 Jan 2026 7:05 am
All your post does is focus on economic intellectual tomorrows and that is honoring reasonable doubt daily. Social consensus minds are made to believe personal brains cannot navigate in a series parallel time of development equally alive since conceived adapting to the moment inhabiting space in series parallel genetic positions never same total sum results twice.Vegas » 25 Dec 2025, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
↓
↓newGH07 Copia 2
3 Jan 2026 7:49 am
Babble on you **** spewing piece of ****.*31stArrival » 03 Jan 2026, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑ All your post does is focus on economic intellectual tomorrows and that is honoring reasonable doubt daily. Social consensus minds are made to believe personal brains cannot navigate in a series parallel time of development equally alive since conceived adapting to the moment inhabiting space in series parallel genetic positions never same total sum results twice.
M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard
Now, eat your horse meat!
3 Jan 2026 7:53 am
So now you are coming to the rescue of Vegas being called out for ignoring his natural time alive since conception and evolving equally alive daily here?murdock » 03 Jan 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ Babble on you **** spewing piece of ****.
M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard M'lard
Now, eat your horse meat!
3 Jan 2026 10:50 am
Choke on a horse dick until you're no longer alive daily, m'lard.*31stArrival » 03 Jan 2026, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ So now you are coming to the rescue of Vegas being called out for ignoring his natural time alive since conception and evolving equally alive daily here?
M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard
M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard
M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard
M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard
M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard
M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard M'lard m'lard
3 Jan 2026 12:02 pm
I already said yes. How many **** times do I need to repeat "yes" to you?
@Cannonpointer @Deezer Shoove please confirm that you will mod under the conditions of the agreed deal below between the forum **** and me.
This is where he agreed.
Vegas » Yesterday, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 9:42 pm
You have not answered it and you know you haven't.
This will continue until you do.
Also, yes I see the game he is trying to pull. He is claiming that I acknowledged that he answered. That implies that he answered. So **** off Veghead with your dishonest ****. Here is the deal you agreed to. See you in a month.Blackvegetable
I show you acknowledging that I've answered it and you leave for 5 years.
Deal?
Here is the deal:
Deal:
Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
3 Jan 2026 12:17 pm
No "conditions"...Vegas » 03 Jan 2026, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ I already said yes. How many **** times do I need to repeat "yes" to you?
@Cannonpointer @Deezer Shoove please confirm that you will mod under the conditions
I show you.
You leave for 5 years...
3 Jan 2026 12:31 pm
Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ No "conditions"...
I show you.
You leave for 5 years...
Nope. When it comes to you, there always has to be conditions. Always! You don't have an honest bone in your body.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
3 Jan 2026 12:35 pm
3 Jan 2026 12:37 pm
Yes, welshy.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
3 Jan 2026 12:38 pm
I paid the price...
Even though the ref has syphilis.
3 Jan 2026 12:39 pm
Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I paid the price...
Even though the ref has syphilis.
You brought that price on yourself.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
3 Jan 2026 12:41 pm
No...you two set the bar for what constitutes an Answer.
And you've been bitching about it ever since.
3 Jan 2026 12:42 pm
Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ No...you two set the bar for what constitutes an Answer.
And you've been bitching about it ever since.
No *******. God you will say anything to cop out.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
3 Jan 2026 12:50 pm
Record's easy enough to find.
3 Jan 2026 12:51 pm
Ok. Let's see it.
1. Of course you won't show ****.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
3 Jan 2026 1:34 pm
Vegas » 03 Jan 2026, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ I already said yes. How many **** times do I need to repeat "yes" to you?
@Cannonpointer @Deezer Shoove please confirm that you will mod under the conditions of the agreed deal below between the forum **** and me.
This is where he agreed.
Also, yes I see the game he is trying to pull. He is claiming that I acknowledged that he answered. That implies that he answered. So **** off Veghead with your dishonest ****. Here is the deal you agreed to. See you in a month.
Here is the deal:
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Imo, your problem is believing anything a piece of **** says.
3 Jan 2026 2:30 pm
murdock » 03 Jan 2026, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Imo, your problem is believing anything a piece of **** says.
Of course. That is why I have the mods involved. I don't believe a word he says.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 5368 users online :: 4 registered, 17 bots, and 5347 guests
Bots: Bolt, BuiltWith, proximic, Not, NING, okhttp, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Baiduspider, bingbot