Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Kilmar Garcia Abrego - Case Cancelled by Judge
Kilmar Garcia Abrego - Case Cancelled by Judge
By Johnny You
28 Dec 2025 2:17 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
30 Dec 2025 9:07 pm
Chief Steven SundBlackvegetable » 30 Dec 2025, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑ **** off, you tedious asshole
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-235651652542
@ChiefSund
Ma’am, it is long past time to be honest with the American people. On January 3, I requested National Guard assistance, but your Sergeant at Arms denied it. Under federal law (2 U.S.C. §1970), I was prohibited from calling them in without specific approval. That same day, Carol Corbin at the Pentagon offered National Guard support, but I was forced to decline because I lacked the legal authority. On January 6, while the Capitol was under attack and despite my repeated calls, your Sergeant at Arms again denied my urgent requests for over 70 agonizing minutes, “running it up the chain” for your approval. When I needed assistance, it was denied. Yet when it suited you, you ordered fencing topped with concertina wire and surrounded the Capitol with thousands of armed National Guard troops
"Does the Sergeant at Arms takes his orders directly from the House Speaker...?
Yes, the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives takes orders from the Speaker of the House or other presiding officers, playing a key role in maintaining order and security in the House chamber."
31 Dec 2025 6:22 am
You're an idiot..*GHETTOBLASTER » 30 Dec 2025, 10:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Chief Steven Sund
@ChiefSund
Ma’am, it is long past time to be honest with the American people. On January 3, I requested National Guard assistance, but your Sergeant at Arms denied it. Under federal law (2 U.S.C. §1970), I was prohibited from calling them in without specific approval. That same day, Carol Corbin at the Pentagon offered National Guard support, but I was forced to decline because I lacked the legal authority. On January 6, while the Capitol was under attack and despite my repeated calls, your Sergeant at Arms again denied my urgent requests for over 70 agonizing minutes, “running it up the chain” for your approval. When I needed assistance, it was denied. Yet when it suited you, you ordered fencing topped with concertina wire and surrounded the Capitol with thousands of armed National Guard troops
"Does the Sergeant at Arms takes his orders directly from the House Speaker...?
Yes, the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives takes orders from the Speaker of the House or other presiding officers, playing a key role in maintaining order and security in the House chamber."
Why didn't Grafty testify?
31 Dec 2025 6:23 am
J6 for dick dummies..
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
31 Dec 2025 6:24 am
Continuance of your glorification of thugs*GHETTOBLASTER » 30 Dec 2025, 10:07 pm » wrote: ↑ no spam
no spam
Ma’am, it is long past time to be honest with the American people. On January 3, I requested National Guard assistance, but your Sergeant at Arms denied it. Under federal law (2 U.S.C. §1970), I was prohibited from calling them in without specific approval. That same day, Carol Corbin at the Pentagon offered National Guard support, but I was forced to decline because I lacked the legal authority. On January 6, while the Capitol was under attack and despite my repeated calls, your Sergeant at Arms again denied my urgent requests for over 70 agonizing minutes, “running it up the chain” for your approval. When I needed assistance, it was denied. Yet when it suited you, you ordered fencing topped with concertina wire and surrounded the Capitol with thousands of armed National Guard troops
"Does the Sergeant at Arms takes his orders directly from the House Speaker...?
Yes, the Sergeant at Arms of the United States House of Representatives takes orders from the Speaker of the House or other presiding officers, playing a key role in maintaining order and security in the House chamber."
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
31 Dec 2025 6:26 am
that scumbag will be gone soon
31 Dec 2025 6:26 am
The interaction I posted that proves the Sgt at Arms was under orders from his boss [Pelosi] to turn down additional security had nothing to do with Trump you moron......
31 Dec 2025 6:29 am
Board libtards are hitting every archaic thread to escape the Democrat pile of **** in Minnesota.*GHETTOBLASTER » 31 Dec 2025, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ The interaction I posted that proves the Sgt at Arms was under orders from his boss [Pelosi] to turn down additional security had nothing to do with Trump you moron......
I'm hip to the ways of these scumturds.
31 Dec 2025 6:35 am
The decision on whether to call National Guard troops to the Capitol is made by what is known as the Capitol Police Board, which is made up of the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms and the Architect of the Capitol. The board decided not to call the guard ahead of the insurrection but did eventually request assistance after the rioting had already begun, and the troops arrived several hours later.*GHETTOBLASTER » 31 Dec 2025, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ The interaction I posted that proves the Sgt at Arms was under orders from his boss [Pelosi] to turn down additional security had nothing to do with Trump you moron......
The House Sergeant at Arms reports to Pelosi and the Senate Sergeant at Arms reported to McConnell, a Republican who was then Senate Majority Leader. There is no evidence that either directed the security officials not to call the guard beforehand, and Hammill said after the insurrection that Pelosi was never informed of such a request.
The officials on the board, along with the former Capitol Police chief, Steven Sund, have disputed each others’ accounts of who requested the guard when. Both Sergeants of Arms and the police chief resigned immediately after the attack.
Once Trump’s supporters were assaulting police and breaking into the building, Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer appealed to military leaders, asking the Army to deploy the National Guard....
Republicans have falsely laid the blame on Pelosi without mentioning that GOP Leader McConnell had similar authority over the security officials that day. But there is no evidence that either was involved in any effort to block the National Guard before or during the insurrection.
Ibid.
what makes you so credulous?
Maybe you should stop nursing at the teat of Rube Media...
had nothing to do with Trump
Who said it did, Shart?
31 Dec 2025 6:36 am
SHOW US ALL OF THE BADLY BEATEN COPS LYING IN POOLS OF THEIR OWN BLOOD....!!!
YOU KNOW YOU CAN'T BECAUSE THERE ARE NONE....!!
The Sgt at Arms who answers directly to Pelosi turned down offers for more security prior to Jan 6.
Deal with it you truth hating piece of ****.
31 Dec 2025 6:37 am
Blackvegetable » 31 Dec 2025, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ The decision on whether to call National Guard troops to the Capitol is made by what is known as the Capitol Police Board, which is made up of the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms and the Architect of the Capitol. The board decided not to call the guard ahead of the insurrection but did eventually request assistance after the rioting had already begun, and the troops arrived several hours later.
The House Sergeant at Arms reports to Pelosi and the Senate Sergeant at Arms reported to McConnell, a Republican who was then Senate Majority Leader. There is no evidence that either directed the security officials not to call the guard beforehand, and Hammill said after the insurrection that Pelosi was never informed of such a request.
The officials on the board, along with the former Capitol Police chief, Steven Sund, have disputed each others’ accounts of who requested the guard when. Both Sergeants of Arms and the police chief resigned immediately after the attack.
Once Trump’s supporters were assaulting police and breaking into the building, Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer appealed to military leaders, asking the Army to deploy the National Guard....
Republicans have falsely laid the blame on Pelosi without mentioning that GOP Leader McConnell had similar authority over the security officials that day. But there is no evidence that either was involved in any effort to block the National Guard before or during the insurrection.
Ibid.
what makes you so credulous?
Maybe you should stop nursing at the teat of Rube Media...
Who said it did, Shart?
Pelosi has blood on here hands, that *** byrd will get his one day
31 Dec 2025 6:37 am
#107Blackvegetable » 31 Dec 2025, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ The decision on whether to call National Guard troops to the Capitol is made by what is known as the Capitol Police Board, which is made up of the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms and the Architect of the Capitol. The board decided not to call the guard ahead of the insurrection but did eventually request assistance after the rioting had already begun, and the troops arrived several hours later.
The House Sergeant at Arms reports to Pelosi and the Senate Sergeant at Arms reported to McConnell, a Republican who was then Senate Majority Leader. There is no evidence that either directed the security officials not to call the guard beforehand, and Hammill said after the insurrection that Pelosi was never informed of such a request.
The officials on the board, along with the former Capitol Police chief, Steven Sund, have disputed each others’ accounts of who requested the guard when. Both Sergeants of Arms and the police chief resigned immediately after the attack.
Once Trump’s supporters were assaulting police and breaking into the building, Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer appealed to military leaders, asking the Army to deploy the National Guard....
Republicans have falsely laid the blame on Pelosi without mentioning that GOP Leader McConnell had similar authority over the security officials that day. But there is no evidence that either was involved in any effort to block the National Guard before or during the insurrection.
Ibid.
what makes you so credulous?
Maybe you should stop nursing at the teat of Rube Media...
Who said it did, Shart?
31 Dec 2025 6:38 am
31 Dec 2025 6:38 am
The Sgt at Arms who answers directly to Pelosi turned down offers for more security prior to Jan 6.
Deal with it you truth hating piece of ****.
SHOW US ALL OF THE BADLY BEATEN COPS LYING IN POOLS OF THEIR OWN BLOOD....!!!
YOU KNOW YOU CAN'T BECAUSE THERE ARE NONE....!!
31 Dec 2025 6:40 am
Right..RebelGator » 31 Dec 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ Board libtards are hitting every archaic thread to escape the Democrat pile of **** in Minnesota.
I'm hip to the ways of these scumturds.
Whatever yarn FOX is waving in front of your rheumy eyes is more important than the dumpster fire in the Oval Office...
31 Dec 2025 6:41 am
31 Dec 2025 6:41 am
Blackvegetable » 31 Dec 2025, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ Right..
Whatever yarn FOX is waving in front of your rheumy eyes is more important than the dumpster fire in the Oval Office...
fire at your house
31 Dec 2025 6:43 am
The proof is in the pudding, you're running like a Somalian being chased by a lion.Blackvegetable » 31 Dec 2025, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ Right..
Whatever yarn FOX is waving in front of your rheumy eyes is more important than the dumpster fire in the Oval Office...
Lion....lyin'.....I just can't help the symmetry of it all.
31 Dec 2025 6:48 am
Justice Dept. Leaders Pushed to Charge Abrego Garcia, Emails Show
The release of the emails raised serious questions about whether the Justice Department had misled a judge in telling him that local prosecutors had acted alone in charging Mr. Abrego Garcia.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/30/nyre ... s-doj.html
This is a DoJ which brazenly lies to judges...surely out of respect for da konstatooshun....
The release of the emails raised serious questions about whether the Justice Department had misled a judge in telling him that local prosecutors had acted alone in charging Mr. Abrego Garcia.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/30/nyre ... s-doj.html
This is a DoJ which brazenly lies to judges...surely out of respect for da konstatooshun....
31 Dec 2025 6:48 am
That's what Kilmar said.RebelGator » 31 Dec 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑ The proof is in the pudding, you're running like a Somalian being chased by a lion.
Lion....lyin'.....I just can't help the symmetry of it all.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
31 Dec 2025 6:49 am
2xWorse than Buchanan......and counting.
Who is online
In total there are 2370 users online :: 8 registered, 15 bots, and 2347 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, jerra b, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: Pinterest, DuckDuckBot, proximic, ADmantX, okhttp, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Applebot, GPTBot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot, Baiduspider, Googlebot