Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 28 Dec 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:26 am

go have a good cry...

Have another good run, Slizzy...


 

DeezerShoove » 28 Dec 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 10:36 am

Define felony stalking.

I supplied him with a link....  

https://superdog.com/emotional-support-dogs-for-sale/


 

ROG62 » 28 Dec 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:28 am

what are you, a **** snowflake?

https://superdog.com/emotional-support-dogs-for-sale/

"A GAME-CHANGER"

I can think of no element out of which you aren't. 

Huey » 28 Dec 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 10:38 am

WoW! Another call out thread.  At least your acting less ****** like and did not use PG.

He must have really kicked your ***.

 @Beekeeper  put the final nail in the coffin...  
 

DeezerShoove » 28 Dec 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:01 am

How many times must you see the words "Define what a woman is..."
before you recognize you are being asked to define "woman"?

You are a lying troll. Common as dirt.
For you to demand ANYONE to define something is absurd.
Troll on, stalker.
It's what you do and in doing so, invite responses in kind.
Why you would feign surprise at other posters being annoying right back at you is irrelevant.

You are a troll. People like to **** on you and you seem to like it. Enjoy.

+1000
 

You lost mother ****. The normal adults are in charge now.

DeezerShoove » 28 Dec 2025, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:24 am

It is precisely about your hypocrisy, stupid ***.
Falling back on that "don't get personal" crap won't fly.
You made a demand of me as if you honor that type of demand yourself. You never do...
An attempt at deflection as usual.

You do not possess that simple honor so don't try waving that flag in defense.
Being a hypocritical **** is your place. Now please own it, ya woke piece of ****.

btw
Was your mother a woman?

 

+1000

RebelGator » 28 Dec 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 7:41 am

Too late, his foot already went up your ***.

Well...if Bv hadn't shakin' is butt at him.

ROG62 » 28 Dec 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:30 am

Huey » 28 Dec 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 10:38 am

WoW! Another call out thread.  At least your acting less ****** like and did not use PG.

He must have really kicked your ***.

 @Beekeeper  put the final nail in the coffin...

And now he will do all he can to reframe and change the subject.
 

Huey » 28 Dec 2025, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:39 am

And now he will do all he can to reframe of change the subject.

It's coming...

Huey » 28 Dec 2025, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:39 am

And now he will do all he can to reframe and change the subject.

And to think that this moron was the result of the best and fastest sperm Daddy could produce! 
Can you imagine how retarded the rest of them must have been?
My guess is they were out looking for stores to loot inside his mama!

The discussions on GDP are always interesting, and both parties will always push a narrative.

This actually sounds reasonable from a non expert point of view: AI slop:

, many economists view recent GDP figures with skepticism, calling them "fake" or "distorted" due to significant impacts from trade policy (tariffs) and import swings, making headline numbers misleading; while imports falling boosts GDP, it masks weaker underlying domestic demand, with some analysts suggesting the true economic picture shows slower, more vulnerable growth than headline figures suggest, especially given contradictions with job reports.

Why Economists Are Skeptical

Trade Distortions: A major factor is the artificial inflation from tariffs, where businesses import heavily before new tariffs (like those in 2025), causing earlier quarters to look bad, then imports plummet, making the next quarter's GDP look artificially strong due to fewer imports (a subtraction in GDP calculation).

Focus on Domestic Demand: Critics point out that when imports drop, it artificially boosts GDP, but real domestic demand (what Americans are actually buying) might be much weaker, showing a slowdown, not a boom.

Data Lag & Revisions: GDP reports are estimates and undergo revisions, with some economists questioning the reliability of government statistics amidst political pressures, leading to confusion and distrust.

Conflicting Indicators: When GDP numbers contradict strong employment reports, economists often look to jobs data as more reliable, suggesting the economy isn't as robust as the headline GDP number implies.

The "Fake" Argument in Action (Example from mid-2025)
A 3% Q2 GDP rise was cited, but economists noted this was largely because imports crashed after an earlier surge to avoid tariffs, not because of genuine production strength.

Stripping out these trade effects revealed a much more modest underlying growth rate (e.g., 2.5-3%).

In essence, the "fake" label stems from the view that current GDP reports are capturing temporary, policy-driven trade anomalies rather than underlying economic health, hiding a less impressive reality.
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:15 am

Who among you idiots will stand behind Fondler's insistence that this

"GDP up 79%"

is the same as

• 79% increase in growth rate: If Q4 2024 saw 2.4% growth, a 79% increase would put the rate around 4.3%, which is what was reported for Q3 2025, as per the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).

 
?

Be counted...

I hear sheep squealing...

The challenge remains.



 

Fuelman » 28 Dec 2025, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:51 am

The discussions on GDP are always interesting, and both parties will always push a narrative.

This actually sounds reasonable from a non expert point of view: AI slop:

, many economists view recent GDP figures with skepticism, calling them "fake" or "distorted" due to significant impacts from trade policy (tariffs) and import swings, making headline numbers misleading; while imports falling boosts GDP, it masks weaker underlying domestic demand, with some analysts suggesting the true economic picture shows slower, more vulnerable growth than headline figures suggest, especially given contradictions with job reports.

Why Economists Are Skeptical

Trade Distortions: A major factor is the artificial inflation from tariffs, where businesses import heavily before new tariffs (like those in 2025), causing earlier quarters to look bad, then imports plummet, making the next quarter's GDP look artificially strong due to fewer imports (a subtraction in GDP calculation).

Focus on Domestic Demand: Critics point out that when imports drop, it artificially boosts GDP, but real domestic demand (what Americans are actually buying) might be much weaker, showing a slowdown, not a boom.

Data Lag & Revisions: GDP reports are estimates and undergo revisions, with some economists questioning the reliability of government statistics amidst political pressures, leading to confusion and distrust.

Conflicting Indicators: When GDP numbers contradict strong employment reports, economists often look to jobs data as more reliable, suggesting the economy isn't as robust as the headline GDP number implies.

The "Fake" Argument in Action (Example from mid-2025)
A 3% Q2 GDP rise was cited, but economists noted this was largely because imports crashed after an earlier surge to avoid tariffs, not because of genuine production strength.

Stripping out these trade effects revealed a much more modest underlying growth rate (e.g., 2.5-3%).

In essence, the "fake" label stems from the view that current GDP reports are capturing temporary, policy-driven trade anomalies rather than underlying economic health, hiding a less impressive reality.

And another pile of obfuscation.


Here's an idea.

Take a stand and learn something useful.

Not that you'll retain it...
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:58 am

And another pile of obfuscation.

Here's an idea.

Take a stand and learn something useful.

Not that you'll retain it...

I'm not sure why you insist on being an asshole all the time but you're really good at it.
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:56 am

Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:15 am

Who among you idiots will stand behind Fondler's insistence that this

"GDP up 79%"

is the same as

• 79% increase in growth rate: If Q4 2024 saw 2.4% growth, a 79% increase would put the rate around 4.3%, which is what was reported for Q3 2025, as per the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).

 
?

Be counted...

I hear sheep squealing...

The challenge remains.



 

 

 

Huey » 28 Dec 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:18 am

Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 11:15 am

Who among you idiots will stand behind Fondler's insistence that this

"GDP up 79%"

is the same as

• 79% increase in growth rate: If Q4 2024 saw 2.4% growth, a 79% increase would put the rate around 4.3%, which is what was reported for Q3 2025, as per the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).

 
?





Be counted...


 

Beekeeper » 28 Dec 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 8:41 am

Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 8:20 am

Does this mean GDP "is up 79%"?

What did the POST SAY, DICKSUCK??

Over last years 4th quarter, it's an INCREASE OF 79%. 

So you ADMIT that MATH IS HARD FOR YOU!! Did we ever doubt that??

One thing for sure, your DADDY was WEAK on that pullout game which resulted in an IDIOT LIKE YOU!! He should have wiped you on the curtain.



 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Once you acknowledge this point, Askholio.

 

Yes, it does.  Address what came before your reframing challenge.  Or do what you do best....RUN.

Fuelman » 28 Dec 2025, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 12:05 pm

I'm not sure why you insist on being an asshole all the time but you're really good at it.

Don't act aggrieved because you were busted.

Now take a stand, please.
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 12:08 pm

Don't act aggrieved because you were busted.

Now take a stand, please.

Address Beekeepers curb stomping of you that came before your diversion challenge.

PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT DONE ANYTHING ARE IN NO POSITION TO DEMAND THINGS BE DONE.

WHEN THE MATTER OF THE OP IS RESOLVED, WE CAN MOVE ON TO CAUTERIZE YOUR STUMPS.

 

Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2025, 12:12 pm

PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT DONE ANYTHING ARE IN NO POSITION TO DEMAND THINGS BE DONE.

WHEN THE MATTER OF THE OP IS RESOLVED, WE CAN MOVE ON TO CAUTERIZE YOUR STUMPS.

 

 

AWWW, we have achieved meltdown.  LMAO, Cowardly Too Far.

Idiot, the matter has been resolved with beekeepers post.  You got a massive beat down, a curbstopning.  You just refused to acknowledge that post.

Now keep stoping your feet and holding your breathe until you turn blue.