Yes I did. The POST stands as the answer and since it MASSIVELY KICKS YOUR ***, you resort to this ****!!Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you didn't.
The answer is either "yes", or "no"
Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑ STILL WAITING TO SEE THE NUMBER THESE CLOWNS INSISTED THEY COULD CALCULATE...
By what has Real GDP risen over the past 12 months?Beekeeper » 28 Dec 2025, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑
- 79% increase in growth rate: If Q4 2024 saw 2.4% growth, a 79% increase would put the rate around 4.3%, which is what was reported for Q3 2025, as per the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
No.
1.2 Million jobs lost? If @ROG62 has numbers from somewhere to back his claim I am all EARS. But numbers are nearly blown off the sides of our head right now.Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑![]()
The Economy, according to @ROG62 , nearly DOUBLED in size in 10 months.
no spam
What does the world look like to someone THIS **** stupid?
Anyone?
How much of it is Military Spending? Funded by Tax Revenue?Beekeeper » 28 Dec 2025, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑
- 79% increase in growth rate: If Q4 2024 saw 2.4% growth, a 79% increase would put the rate around 4.3%, which is what was reported for Q3 2025, as per the no spam .
Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ By what has Real GDP risen over the past 12 months?
Fondler,Beekeeper » 29 Dec 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑It's quite OBVIOUS you are a **** IDIOT and can't accept that YOU GOT YOUR *** KICKED MASSIVELY!!
- 79% increase in growth rate: If Q4 2024 saw 2.4% growth, a 79% increase would put the rate around 4.3%, which is what was reported for Q3 2025, as per the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ @Deezer Shoove
When does this cross into "Felony Stalking"?
2.4% * 1.79 = 4.296Blackvegetable » 29 Dec 2025, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ Fondler,
Fake it somewhere else.
You can't even do THAT math.
Because you're a **** cretin
Agreed, like inflation reports, picking and choosing favorable sectors...Fuelman » 28 Dec 2025, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ The discussions on GDP are always interesting, and both parties will always push a narrative.
This actually sounds reasonable from a non expert point of view: AI slop:
, many economists view recent GDP figures with skepticism, calling them "fake" or "distorted" due to significant impacts from trade policy (tariffs) and import swings, making headline numbers misleading; while imports falling boosts GDP, it masks weaker underlying domestic demand, with some analysts suggesting the true economic picture shows slower, more vulnerable growth than headline figures suggest, especially given contradictions with job reports.
Why Economists Are Skeptical
Trade Distortions: A major factor is the artificial inflation from tariffs, where businesses import heavily before new tariffs (like those in 2025), causing earlier quarters to look bad, then imports plummet, making the next quarter's GDP look artificially strong due to fewer imports (a subtraction in GDP calculation).
Focus on Domestic Demand: Critics point out that when imports drop, it artificially boosts GDP, but real domestic demand (what Americans are actually buying) might be much weaker, showing a slowdown, not a boom.
Data Lag & Revisions: GDP reports are estimates and undergo revisions, with some economists questioning the reliability of government statistics amidst political pressures, leading to confusion and distrust.
Conflicting Indicators: When GDP numbers contradict strong employment reports, economists often look to jobs data as more reliable, suggesting the economy isn't as robust as the headline GDP number implies.
The "Fake" Argument in Action (Example from mid-2025)
A 3% Q2 GDP rise was cited, but economists noted this was largely because imports crashed after an earlier surge to avoid tariffs, not because of genuine production strength.
Stripping out these trade effects revealed a much more modest underlying growth rate (e.g., 2.5-3%).
In essence, the "fake" label stems from the view that current GDP reports are capturing temporary, policy-driven trade anomalies rather than underlying economic health, hiding a less impressive reality.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Beekeeper » 29 Dec 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ 2.4% * 1.79 = 4.296
Which is effectively 4.3% GDP rate of growth.
Please, its YOU that can't math, MORON!!
"Russian Studies" was a TOTALLY WORTHLESS PIECE OF **** "degree"!!
keep wallowing in the mud, brown...how's the pig slop this morning?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You're **** kidding, right?Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ And another pile of obfuscation.
Here's an idea.
Take a stand and learn something useful.
Not that you'll retain it...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ROG62 » 29 Dec 2025, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ Agreed, like inflation reports, picking and choosing favorable sectors...
one problem with AI, it's only as good as it's "sources"...
:die: :rofl: :die: :rofl: :die: :rofl:it's only as good as it's "sources"...
JohnnyYou » 29 Dec 2025, 4:55 am » wrote: ↑ How much of it is Military Spending? Funded by Tax Revenue?
A big chunk is consumer spending.. Would that not increase if prices go up?
Ready to go over the Cassidy thing, ******?
it's what bitter little men with tiny feet that hide behind their keyboards do...Fuelman » 28 Dec 2025, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not sure why you insist on being an asshole all the time but you're really good at it.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom