
Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑
In the original National Lampoon story, the "Sluts de Boxcar"—specifically identified as Charlotte Pinckney and Robin Salbury—are described with the following traits:
Social Status: They are portrayed as "sickeningly rich" students from Jodsten, an exclusive private school.
Behavioral Description: O.C. describes them as "totally maladjusted nymphos". Despite this crude characterization, he notes that he and Stiggs "love [them] more than our own lives".
Is your mom still riding box cars?
Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑
In the original National Lampoon story, the "Sluts de Boxcar"—specifically identified as Charlotte Pinckney and Robin Salbury—are described with the following traits:
Social Status: They are portrayed as "sickeningly rich" students from Jodsten, an exclusive private school.
Behavioral Description: O.C. describes them as "totally maladjusted nymphos". Despite this crude characterization, he notes that he and Stiggs "love [them] more than our own lives".
↓Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Blackvegetable » 28 Dec 2025, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑
In the original National Lampoon story, the "Sluts de Boxcar"—specifically identified as Charlotte Pinckney and Robin Salbury—are described with the following traits:
Social Status: They are portrayed as "sickeningly rich" students from Jodsten, an exclusive private school.
Behavioral Description: O.C. describes them as "totally maladjusted nymphos". Despite this crude characterization, he notes that he and Stiggs "love [them] more than our own lives".
Are these my words?Vegas » 28 Dec 2025, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓newGH07 Copia 2
I will not entertain your stalking.
it is a good thing NH does not have red flag laws. Your TDA is to the point that the shotgun you can’t find should be taken away.
Another rule that doesn't apply to you?Vegas » 28 Dec 2025, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Copies me again. As always. No thoughts of his own. He has to use everyone else's thoughts.
Pile on that evidence.
QED. 100% accuracy.
1.. Continue to copy. Duh.
Do you insist that your stalking be indulged?Vegas » 28 Dec 2025, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the rule. Post me copying others as many times as you do.
yeah, that's what i thought.
Is that "yes" or "no"?Vegas » 28 Dec 2025, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ And the blatant projection arises. Hello Mary.
And of course, you have to display your response as a question. God, I have never met anyone that has more control issues than you.
1. Eventually you will copy that ^^^
It's "eat a dick".