Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:02 am

What's funny is @*MankyLittleSkidmark exposing the **** of asking the question. 

While refusing to provide your own definition.

I DID PROVIDE YOU WITH A DEFINITION... YOU GAVE AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT A WOMAN DOES.... NOT A DEFINITION... KEEP TRYING *** WILLY

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 8:58 am

I responded directly and unambigously to each point.

1.  if you need an explanation you are too far gone to be in the conversation

I have no idea what you can't understand and if asked, you won't tell me.

You lack the shame to not play stupid, and will do so forever.

2. Lea Thomas is a transgender.

You're a **** rube.

Take the Ls.

2. Lea Thomas is a transgender.

You confirmed your loss right there.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:04 am

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:01 am

Still nothing.  You haven't beat **** except your meat.  Or VaJayJay. Shrug.

Lea Thomas is a man, born a male, and went thru puberty as a male.  He should not be competing I female sports.

Apparently you believe he should.

If you won't confirm what you do, and do not, understand it is pointless for me to try to make you understand. 

 

I do confirm what I do.  You claim victory without any proof.  So it is pointless for me to entertain your BS.

But I do because I love jerking your chain.

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:08 am

You confirmed your loss right there.

No....because you cannot explain why.

You can only discuss the topic in the framework of The Five...it must be Men in Women's Sports even though that isn't the issue.


If they had to deal with THE FACT that Thomas is transgender it would confuse the idiots nursing at their teat.

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:09 am

I do confirm what I do.  You claim victory without any proof.  So it is pointless for me to entertain your BS.

But I do because I love jerking your chain.

No, you don't. 

You have a proud history of running from your own words...and playing stupid.

You claim victory without any proof

I posted the proof, in your words, ProjectoLass.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:11 am

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:08 am

You confirmed your loss right there.

No....because you cannot explain why.

You can only discuss the topic in the framework of The Five...it must be Men in Women's Sports even though that isn't the issue.


If they had to deal with THE FACT that Thomas is transgender it would confuse the idiots nursing at their teat.

 

You can't back up your claims. What a ******.  ;)

The FIVE has nothing to do with this.  But common sense does.  Which you have none of.  Thomas is a male and should not be participating in women's sports.

You lose.  You also lied when you claimed you would go with whatever the sanctioning body declared.  You are now dead on supporting men in female sports.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:14 am

No, you don't. 

You have a proud history of running from your own words...and playing stupid.

I posted the proof, in your words, ProjectoLass.

Liar.  You posted my words.  You are running from explaining how they support a loss on my part.  Keep running like you did when I went to Boston.    

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:14 am

You can't back up your claims. What a ******.  

The FIVE has nothing to do with this.  But common sense does.  Which you have none of.  Thomas is a male and should not be participating in women's sports.

You lose.  You also lied when you claimed you would go with whatever the sanctioning body declared.  You are now dead on supporting men in female sports.

I just did.

Stop lying about your dependence on Influencers.


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 8:52 am

Not only can I, I did.

I also explained why it's ****.

I have yet to see you, or any of your fellow MAGAt idiots do ANY math....

Except the time @Vegas  tried....

With disastrous results....

Then you can point to the post where you calculated the RATE OF GROWTH of GDP, right COCKSUCK??

     

It's 79% just so you know.

Beekeeper » 03 Jan 2026, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:17 am

Then you can point to the post where you calculated the RATE OF GROWTH of GDP, right COCKSUCK??

     

It's 79% just so you know.

A) it wasn't relevant to the OP

B) You pulled it off the innertubes. Why would I need to do any more? It's not my diversion.


Nod.
 

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:15 am

Liar.  You posted my words.  You are running from explaining how they support a loss on my part.  Keep running like you did when I went to Boston.  

Post my lie.

It's obvious. And I don't waste time trying to get you to acknowledge the Obvious.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:17 am

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:14 am

You can't back up your claims. What a ******.  

The FIVE has nothing to do with this.  But common sense does.  Which you have none of.  Thomas is a male and should not be participating in women's sports.

You lose.  You also lied when you claimed you would go with whatever the sanctioning body declared.  You are now dead on supporting men in female sports.

I just did.

Stop lying about your dependence on Influencers.


 

 

Nope, you haven't posted ****.  Just a lot of BS.  You solidified your loss when you made it clear you think Lea Thomas is not Male or a man.

You have no common sense. 

I have kicked your *** just like I kicked your butt buddies on this topic.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:21 am

Post my lie.

It's obvious. And I don't waste time trying to get you to acknowledge the Obvious.

IGNORE BV THE *** LIBERAL SHILL

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:21 am

Post my lie.

It's obvious. And I don't waste time trying to get you to acknowledge the Obvious.

I'm good.  I got you to solidify your loss with your nonsense that Lea Thomas is not a man and exposed your lie that you will go with whatever a sanctioning body rules on men in women's sports.

LMAO.  Hoisted....petard.....

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:21 am

Nope, you haven't posted ****.  Just a lot of BS.  You solidified your loss when you made it clear you think Lea Thomas is not Male or a man.

You have no common sense. 

I have kicked your *** just like I kicked your butt buddies on this topic.

 your loss when you made it clear you think Lea Thomas is not Male or a man. You have no common sense.  I have kicked your *** 

Lea Thomas is CLINICALLY transgender.

Regardless of the faces Gutfeld makes when talking about her.

It doesn't have a **** thing with what you've been told to believe is "common sense".
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:18 am

A) it wasn't relevant to the OP

B) You pulled it off the innertubes. Why would I need to do any more? It's not my diversion.

Nod.

       @ROG62  

He'll explain your DODGE AND RUNNING to you too. ANSWER THE QUESTION, ASSHOLE!!

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:27 am

Lea Thomas is CLINICALLY transgender.

Regardless of the faces Gutfeld makes when talking about her.

It doesn't have a **** thing with what you've been told to believe is "common sense".

HOW MANY GENDERS ARE THERE ***?

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:23 am

I'm good

You're curbstomped...

FJB » 03 Jan 2026, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:28 am

HOW MANY GENDERS ARE THERE ***?

3

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 9:29 am

3

thought you *** liberals say follow the science? Science says 2