Liberal Forum

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm

Asked and answered multiple times.  


 

What answer is that?

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:50 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 2:28 pm

I don't have an issue.  I post to you as you post to others. 

Tiny,

This is ****.

You are the poster child of Issue.

 

     

Did you or did you not question the lineage of another poster?  No need to answer, Hypocrite

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:55 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm

Asked and answered multiple times.  



 

What answer is that?

 

 

Sorry that glitch is back.  Not doing edited quotes.  And, if you wish to ask questions it will be done on a one for one basis.  Or, you will have make a point by case that I will tear apart without questions.  But, you are man enough.

My one question just tore apart your premise.

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:49 pm

If you learned to read...

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

How many families?

How many designs?

Asked and answered multiple times.  

Post the years the Semi Automatic Colt Sporter was standard issue as a personal weapon in the US Military?  You never answered that.

 

 

 

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm

Sorry that glitch is back.  

It's the Queef Filter...it's as unyielding as math.

I don't want to read a bunch of crap, I just want the answer. 

 

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:55 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm

Asked and answered multiple times.  




 

What answer is that?

 


 

Sorry that glitch is back.  Not doing edited quotes.  And, if you wish to ask questions it will be done on a one for one basis.  Or, you will have make a point by case that I will tear apart without questions.  But, you are man enough.

My one question just tore apart your premise.

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:49 pm

If you learned to read...

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

How many families?

How many designs?

Asked and answered multiple times.  

Post the years the Semi Automatic Colt Sporter was standard issue as a personal weapon in the US Military?  You never answered that.

 


 

 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:16 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm

Sorry that glitch is back.  

It's the Queef Filter...it's as unyielding as math.

I don't want to read a bunch of crap, I just want the answer. 

 

 

Before we go any further in your upcoming defeat you must post what definition of an assault weapon you are using.  It varies from state to state.

You have been running from that since I asked in August. When you pretended to ignore me.

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:19 pm

Before we go 

You're a lying coward.

You have no right to set conditions. 

I will not read your tantrum crap.

If you don't answer questions, run quietly...I don't care why.

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:19 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:55 pm

What answer is that?

 



 

Sorry that glitch is back.  Not doing edited quotes.  And, if you wish to ask questions it will be done on a one for one basis.  Or, you will have make a point by case that I will tear apart without questions.  But, you are man enough.

My one question just tore apart your premise.

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm

Asked and answered multiple times.  

Post the years the Semi Automatic Colt Sporter was standard issue as a personal weapon in the US Military?  You never answered that.

 



 

 
Since I have stipulated m

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:16 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm

Sorry that glitch is back.  

It's the Queef Filter...it's as unyielding as math.

I don't want to read a bunch of crap, I just want the answer. 

 


 

Before we go any further in your upcoming defeat you must post what definition of an assault weapon you are using.  It varies from state to state.

You have been running from that since I asked in August. When you pretended to ignore me.

 

Since I have stipulated on multiple occasions there are many makes, models and definitions of an assault weapon YOU need to do the following:

1.  Post what definition of an assault weapon you are using.

2.  Post the years Colt Sport was standard issue to US Combat Units and what wars it was used in.

3.  Stipulate that you will answer questions on a one for one basis OR that you will make a case in a point by point manner which I will than rip to shreds.

Oh, and remember, I don't do partial or edited quotes.  Perhaps you can use 3 concise bullet bullet points.  That has always been your demand anyway.
 

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm

Since I have stipulated on multiple occasions there are many makes, models and definitions of an assault weapon YOU need to do the following:


 

You need to answer the question asked.

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:39 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm

Since I have stipulated on multiple occasions there are many makes, models and definitions of an assault weapon YOU need to do the following:



 

You need to answer the question asked.

 

 

 

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:37 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:19 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:02 pm

Sorry that glitch is back.  Not doing edited quotes.  And, if you wish to ask questions it will be done on a one for one basis.  Or, you will have make a point by case that I will tear apart without questions.  But, you are man enough.

My one question just tore apart your premise.


 
Since I have stipulated m


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:16 pm

It's the Queef Filter...it's as unyielding as math.

I don't want to read a bunch of crap, I just want the answer. 

 



 

Before we go any further in your upcoming defeat you must post what definition of an assault weapon you are using.  It varies from state to state.

You have been running from that since I asked in August. When you pretended to ignore me.


 

Since I have stipulated on multiple occasions there are many makes, models and definitions of an assault weapon YOU need to do the following:

1.  Post what definition of an assault weapon you are using.

2.  Post the years Colt Sport was standard issue to US Combat Units and what wars it was used in.

3.  Stipulate that you will answer questions on a one for one basis OR that you will make a case in a point by point manner which I will than rip to shreds.

Oh, and remember, I don't do partial or edited quotes.  Perhaps you can use 3 concise bullet bullet points.  That has always been your demand anyway.
 

 

The answer is in that post.  And you need to make that stipulation?  Why are you afraid to of the question stipulation?  ******.

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:41 pm

The answer is in that post.  And you need to make that stipulation?  Why are you afraid to of the question stipulation?  ******.

No, it is not.


That post is a pile of made up ****.

Now answer the question....you made an issue of it.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:43 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:41 pm

The answer is in that post.  And you need to make that stipulation?  Why are you afraid to of the question stipulation?  ******.

No, it is not.


That post is a pile of made up ****.

Now answer the question....you made an issue of it.
 

 

****.

What specific model was standard military issue for combat?  

What is your definition of a assault weapon?  There are many makes, models and definition out there.  Choose one.

When you start answering questions on a one for one basis I will you again.  You are liar if you say I haven't.  Is that what you are saying?

For the last time their are multiple designs and one family.  Which design are you discussing?

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm

****.


 

What you believe is of zero consequence. 

It is about what credible sources CONSISTENTLY demonstrate.

 

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:43 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:41 pm

The answer is in that post.  And you need to make that stipulation?  Why are you afraid to of the question stipulation?  ******.

No, it is not.

That post is a pile of made up ****.

Now answer the question....you made an issue of it.

****.

What specific model was standard military issue for combat?  

What is your definition of a assault weapon?  There are many makes, models and definition out there.  Choose one.

When you start answering questions on a one for one basis I will you again.  You are liar if you say I haven't.  Is that what you are saying?

For the last time their are multiple designs and one family.  Which design are you discussing?

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:56 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm

****.

What you believe is of zero consequence. 

It is about what credible sources CONSISTENTLY demonstrate.

For the last time their are multiple designs and one family.  Which design are you discussing?

You have been answered, your turn.

 
 

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:59 pm

For the last time their are multiple designs 

No....that is a lie.


It is pointless to debate anything with you because you demand that your feelings, lack of basic literacy and rheumy eyes be privileged over established facts.

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:59 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:43 pm

No, it is not.

That post is a pile of made up ****.

Now answer the question....you made an issue of it.

****.

What specific model was standard military issue for combat?  

What is your definition of a assault weapon?  There are many makes, models and definition out there.  Choose one.

When you start answering questions on a one for one basis I will you again.  You are liar if you say I haven't.  Is that what you are saying?

For the last time their are multiple designs and one family.  Which design are you discussing?

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:56 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm

****.

What you believe is of zero consequence. 

It is about what credible sources CONSISTENTLY demonstrate.

For the last time their are multiple designs and one family.  Which design are you discussing?

You have been answered, your turn.

 
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 5:05 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 4:59 pm

For the last time their are multiple designs 

No....that is a lie.


It is pointless to debate anything with you because you demand that your feelings, lack of basic literacy and rheumy eyes be privileged over established facts.

 

Try again.  It is your turn to answer.  What model of semiautomatic sports weapons are you talking about and what year were they standard combat issue for US Troops?

I got better things to do now that involve a woman.  I'll check tomorrow to see if you made a case or started answering questions.

Until then I accept your surrender.  If you can't define what weapon you are talking about and when it was issued to military service members there is no need to entertain your **** this evening.

 

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm

Try again.  It is your turn to answer.  

No...because when you answer MY question, honestly, the debate is over....again.

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 5:32 pm

No...because when you answer MY question, honestly, the debate is over....again.

BV.. turn the circle jerks off.  This is pointless.

Clock out.
 

JohnnyYou » 03 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm

BV.. turn the circle jerks off.  This is pointless.

Clock out.

There's a point.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 5:36 pm

There's a point.

Yeah I am doing the same..  Over and Out..

See ya Manana amigo..


 

JohnnyYou » 03 Jan 2026, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 5:37 pm

Yeah I am doing the same..  Over and Out..

See ya Manana amigo..

Enjoy....

He'll be back in his crate shortly.