Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 7:41 am

I don't see it.

Little *** KICKED NARCISSISTS LIKE YOU NEVER DO, DICKSUCK!!

How many times do you need your *** KICKED before you realize that simple fact??

Beekeeper » 04 Jan 2026, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 7:43 am

Little *** KICKED NARCISSISTS LIKE YOU NEVER DO, DICKSUCK!!

How many times do you need your *** KICKED before you realize that simple fact??

Along with his ***, it seems he has also been kicked in the head numerous times.   

Beekeeper » 04 Jan 2026, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 7:43 am

Little *** 

I'm accustomed to little bitches insisting in very special rules of engagement....

RebelGator » 04 Jan 2026, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 7:49 am

Along with his ***, it seems he has also been kicked in the head numerous times. 

How can you tell the difference?? Because he pulls **** out of his *** constantly that his handlers shoved up there for him to regurgitate.

Right @Blackvegetable  ??

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 7:52 am

I'm accustomed to little bitches insisting in very special rules of engagement....

No, ****, you're a LITTLE BITCH that runs from confrontation of your OWN MAKING!!

We call that PUSSIFIED COWARICE!!

If you're going to CHALLENGE ME TO A MATCH, SHOW THE **** UP,  ASSHOLE!!

Beekeeper » 04 Jan 2026, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 7:55 am

No, ****, 

Very much so.


This is because I effortlessly taintpunt them across the Innertubes.

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 8:03 am

Very much so.

This is because I am effortlessly taintpunt across the Innertubes.

Welp, you FINALLY got it right!! AFTER I FIFY!!

You really ARE "taintpunted" in more ways that you can possibly imagine!! But that ego of yours, which is really malignant narcissism, prevents you from seeing how much of a **** IDIOT YOU REALLY ARE!!

Ask ANYONE here who the biggest ASSHOLE IS and the answer ALWAYS comes back to you!!

           @ROG62   @Huey   @MR-7   @Jantje_Smit  @RebelGator  
 

Beekeeper » 04 Jan 2026, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 8:46 am

Welp, you 

**** isn't worth reading. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 5:32 pm

Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2026, 5:24 pm

Try again.  It is your turn to answer.  

No...because when you answer MY question, honestly, the debate is over....again.

 

 

This is why people beat the **** out of you daily.  Your question was answered honestly.  Matt designs, one family.

Now, if you are not man enough to actually the mode name and number AND the years this rifle erroneously called a weapon of war was standard issue in the US Military the discussion is over.  You lose.  You have been thoroughly curb stomped, embarrassed and tossed to the side of the road to get pissed on. 

DOn't worry, I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.  ;)

Game....Set...Match.

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:09 am

This is why people beat the **** out of you daily.  Your question was answered honestly.  Matt designs, one family.


 

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design


"Game...Set...Match."

And away we go with you r wacky interpretations.  



:rofl:   :die:  

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:15 am

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:09 am

This is why people beat the **** out of you daily.  Your question was answered honestly.  Matt designs, one family.



 

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design


"Game...Set...Match."

 

This was over a long time ago when you ran from the questions is concerning what weapon you were talking about the years it was the standard issue combat rifle in the US military.

If you can not post the weapon name and model number you are whining about you lose.  And don't forget what list the weapon you are discussing is listed on, military or civilian.  Nod.  

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:20 am

This was over a long time ago when you ran from the questions i

You lie about that, too.

You are running from CITATIONS.


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:24 am

You lie about that, too.

You are running from CITATIONS.

Numbness, I gave you that citation.  Now tell ne the following:

1.  What is the name and model number of the weapon you are discussing?

2.  What years was the weapon standard combat issue for the military?

3.  Which of the two lists at the source of the citation (civilian or military) does the weapon appear on?

Once you HONESTLY answer those 3 very simply questions you will lose.  Well, you already lost. Notice NO ONE has ever said you were right in all the years you have been spewing this ****?

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am

Numbness, I gave you that citation.  

That's another lie.

It is as irrelevant as your questions.

You are not an authority on anything. You are as stupid as you are dishonest.

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:24 am

You lie about that, too.

You are running from CITATIONS.

Numbness, I gave you that citation.  Now tell ne the following:

1.  What is the name and model number of the weapon you are discussing?

2.  What years was the weapon standard combat issue for the military?

3.  Which of the two lists at the source of the citation (civilian or military) does the weapon appear on?

Once you HONESTLY answer those 3 very simply questions you will lose.  Well, you already lost. Notice NO ONE has ever said you were right in all the years you have been spewing this ****?

 

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:35 am

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am

Numbness, I gave you that citation.  

That's another lie.

It is as irrelevant as your questions.

You are not an authority on anything. You are as stupid as you are dishonest.

 

1.  I did give it to you.  That is the one that has the military and civilian lists.  Dude, you memory is **** awful.  That is why it appears you lie so much.  Everything you think you know on this topic came from me.

2.  Waiting on the answers to those questions.  You don't eve know what **** weapon you are talking about.

PS.  This is usually where you see me cuss and YOU rant that I am melting down.  Remember, old man, calculating.

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:41 am

1.  I did 

I don't care about your retelling...

Don't waste our time with it.

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:41 am

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:24 am

You lie about that, too.

You are running from CITATIONS.

Numbness, I gave you that citation.  Now tell ne the following:

1.  What is the name and model number of the weapon you are discussing?

2.  What years was the weapon standard combat issue for the military?

3.  Which of the two lists at the source of the citation (civilian or military) does the weapon appear on?

Once you HONESTLY answer those 3 very simply questions you will lose.  Well, you already lost. Notice NO ONE has ever said you were right in all the years you have been spewing this ****?


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:35 am

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:27 am

Numbness, I gave you that citation.  

That's another lie.

It is as irrelevant as your questions.

You are not an authority on anything. You are as stupid as you are dishonest.


 

1.  I did give it to you.  That is the one that has the military and civilian lists.  Dude, you memory is **** awful.  That is why it appears you lie so much.  Everything you think you know on this topic came from me.

2.  Waiting on the answers to those questions.  You don't eve know what **** weapon you are talking about.

PS.  This is usually where you see me cuss and YOU rant that I am melting down.  Remember, old man, calculating.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:42 am

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:41 am

1.  I did 

I don't care about your retelling...

Don't waste our time with it.

 

I'm sorry little liar, you have questions to answer. 

I gave you that source because I asked you to post the list the weapon was listed on.

But, since you can't name the weapon you can't answer that weapon.
 

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:49 am

I'm sorry little liar, you have questions to answer. 

I gave you that source because I asked you to post the list the weapon was listed on.

But, since you can't name the weapon you can't answer that weapon.

No...I don't. 

The minute you stop lying about the established facts, this is over.

You aren't free to gainsay citations. You are always free to challenge what they assert, but the bar is much higher than "Is too!" and "But my rheumy eyes...."
 

Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 9:41 am

1.  I did give it to you.  That is the .

Your recall sucks...