Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 11:17 am

Attribution 

Genuine Historical Document

"Shoulder triangulation......(...squeak....)!"

single source unsubstantiated piece...

Applied triangulation substantiated by multiple photos along with photos indicating age verification not looking anywhere near the age of your fantasy's buttboi...
 

ROG62 » 01 Jan 2026, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 12:51 pm

single source unsubstantiated piece...

Applied triangulation substantiated by multiple photos along with photos indicating age verification not looking anywhere near the age of your fantasy's buttboi...

And he whines I can’t make a case.

Huey » 01 Jan 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 11:18 am

I really got him in a meltdown because he bumped one of his PG callout threads and when I answered him he sent to PG anyway. 

I love it.

  The bastard's thick, I gotta give him that...
 

ROG62 » 01 Jan 2026, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 12:51 pm

single source unsubstantiated piece...

Applied triangulation substantiated by multiple photos along with photos indicating age verification not looking anywhere near the age of your fantasy's buttboi...

multiple photos 

Photos of whom?


How do you know?




How can anyone be this **** stupid?

Zeets2 » 01 Jan 2026, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 12:33 pm

Hey stupid!
First off, there isn't a single conservative out of the dozens I know who have EVER even LOOKED at an "influencer's" blog or shared the opinion of one.

 

Not much you can tell a FOXnursing DittoHead with a 950 FICO score...

Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 12:53 pm

ROG62 » 01 Jan 2026, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 12:51 pm

single source unsubstantiated piece...

Applied triangulation substantiated by multiple photos along with photos indicating age verification not looking anywhere near the age of your fantasy's buttboi...

multiple photos 

Photos of whom?


How do you know?




How can anyone be this **** stupid?

 

The village voice cover shows you are wrong.  Next, why is the man who refuses to answer question’s asking questions?  

Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 12:56 pm

Not much you can tell a FOXnursing DittoHead with a 950 FICO score...

If someone has a 959 FICO score they must be pretty **** smart.

Huey » 01 Jan 2026, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 12:57 pm

If someone has a 959 FICO score they must be pretty **** smart.

Or hallucinating...

You people are **** idiots.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 1:00 pm

Or hallucinating...

You people are **** idiots.

you do realize that FICO scores only go to 850?  And extremely rare and damn near impossible to achieve.

I bet the Superbowl Ads go over like a bad bunny.

bubblela bobbeezz buh Shake it Off Like the Real Taylor Swift..

youtu.be/nfWlot6h_JM?si=_K8BYXPfpecVjO1l

8 MILLION FOR 30 SECONDS

youtu.be/nfWlot6h_JM?si=_K8BYXPfpecVjO1l

Awkward Barron Trump, 19, Spends New Year’s Eve With Parents After Links to Twisted Woman-Haters Are Revealed


wow!


What are the odds....a rapist for a daddy who talks about **** his own daughter...

Indeed barren ground for dysfunction 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 7:42 am

White House lays out nine-week timeline to win approval for ballroom



Trump is reconstituting the Fine Arts panel set to review his ballroom

Here *******. Watch this. You see the pic below. That is unmistakingly Trump. No doubt. Here is my prompt to AI:

Prompt: "Attribute this pic as Trump"

It's reply: 
I can’t attribute this image as Donald Trump.
I can describe the image, but I can’t verify or confirm the identity of the person shown.


Yet, your ******* wrote a confirmation in your AI response. You thought I wouldn't bust you. BUSTED!

Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 1:00 pm

Or hallucinating...

You people are **** idiots.

Siri? Google?  Is there a clinic for TDS? Donald may need one.

youtu.be/ClbmWkbocoY?si=JljkywCXFGV_j6E5
 

Vegas » 01 Jan 2026, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 1:25 pm

Here *******. Watch this. You see the pic below. That is unmistakingly Trump. No doubt. Here is my prompt to AI:

Prompt: "Attribute this pic as Trump"


 

Stop right there.


Holy **** are you stupid.


 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 1:27 pm

Stop right there.

Holy **** are you stupid.

We already went over that as well. I proved it was grammatically correct already. Your suggestion was wrong.

God your **** memory is ****. How much dope do you smoke a day?

JohnnyYou » 01 Jan 2026, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 1:26 pm

Siri? Google?  Is there a clinic for TDS? Donald may need one.

youtu.be/ClbmWkbocoY?si=JljkywCXFGV_j6E5

At least he owned up to his stupid...


No....wait....of course he didn't....
 

Vegas » 01 Jan 2026, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 1:28 pm

We already went over that 

That's right..

Even you showed that you are an idiot.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 1:28 pm

At least he owned up to his stupid...

No....wait....of course he didn't....

We are all waiting for you to own up to your stupid. 

I would be happy to show how you lied about AI saying that is Trump again. Would you like me to embarrass you again?
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2026, 1:29 pm

That's right..

Even you showed that you are an idiot.

      Yeah, I proved you were wrong...again