No...AI CONFIRMED that it is Grafty...Vegas » 01 Jan 2026, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ We are all waiting for you to own up to your stupid.
I would be happy to show how you lied about AI saying that is Trump again. Would you like me to embarrass you again?
No....post the correct preposition used with "attribute"
Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ No....post the correct preposition used with "attribute"
is there a picture of trump wearing a roman costume with roy cohnBlackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑No...AI CONFIRMED that it is Grafty...Vegas » 01 Jan 2026, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ We are all waiting for you to own up to your stupid.
I would be happy to show how you lied about AI saying that is Trump again. Would you like me to embarrass you again?
Right! And it's long past time you realized that after getting your head pounded in for so many years!Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Not much you can tell a FOXnursing DittoHead with a 950 FICO score...
And maybe, one day, they'll stop lying to you.Zeets2 » 01 Jan 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Right! And it's long past time you realized that after getting your head pounded in for so many years!![]()
![]()
I'm sure there are many things those wise Fox News hosts can tell me, but the ability to withhold my derision of you or your ilk sure ain't one of them!
I already proved to him how AI works. I showed him that AI will never "confirm" identities. It will only describe pictures. It can never confirm. This is the evidence, but of course, he deflects as always. Here is what I showed him:Huey » 01 Jan 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ is there a picture of trump wearing a roman costume with roy cohn
AI OverviewThere is no known authentic photograph of Donald Trump and Roy Cohn wearing Roman costumes together. Publicly available photos typically show them in standard business attire or tuxedos at events in the 1980s.
While numerous genuine photos exist of Trump and Cohn attending events like the Trump Tower opening in 1983, none depict them in Roman costumes. The idea may stem from satirical or digitally altered images, or potentially fictional depictions in recent media, such as the 2024 film The Apprentice, which dramatizes their relationship
is there a picture of trump wearing a roman costume
AI OverviewThere is no known authentic photo of Donald Trump wearing a Roman costume. Images circulated online depicting him in Roman attire, such as a gladiator or emperor, are AI-generated or digitally manipulatedsatirical creations
You were saying?
He does this **** whenever he is wrong.Vegas » 01 Jan 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I already proved to him how AI works. I showed him that AI will never "confirm" identities. It will only describe pictures. It can never confirm. This is the evidence, but of course, he deflects as always. Here is what I showed him:
Here *******. Watch this. You see the pic below. That is unmistakingly Trump. No doubt. Here is my prompt to AI:
Prompt: "Attribute this pic as Trump"
It's reply:
I can’t attribute this image as Donald Trump.
I can describe the image, but I can’t verify or confirm the identity of the person shown.
Yet, your ******* wrote a confirmation in your AI response. You thought I wouldn't bust you. BUSTED!
He is already pretending that he doesn't remember any of this. Narcissist amnesia. It's a real thing:
What it looks like in practicePeople using this pattern may:They remember what flatters them and “forget” what threatens them.
That's pretty funny, dickhead!
They paid 787 million and the head of tucktuck for lying....and counting.Zeets2 » 01 Jan 2026, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ That's pretty funny, dickhead!
Was Fox News the network that told me "Biden was the sharpest guy in the room"?
Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ White House lays out nine-week timeline to win approval for ballroom
Trump is reconstituting the Fine Arts panel set to review his ballroom
Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.
Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background.
At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.
Now learn what "attribute to" means...
The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.
You are much better off spending every waking hour of your life at this forum expressing to the world how miserable you are than if you ever totally lost your **** and became the next ADAM LANSA...!!!Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ White House lays out nine-week timeline to win approval for ballroom
Trump is reconstituting the Fine Arts panel set to review his ballroom
The attribution does, assuming it identifies the subject..
LMAO! No, it’s not.Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ The attribution does, assuming it identifies the subject..
Hence
Mariette Pathy Allen's Credibility:
Allen is a highly respected and pioneering photographer known for her extensive documentation of the transgender and gender-variant communities over nearly five decades. Her work is in the permanent collections of major museums like the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) and the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and her archives are held at Duke University. She is a credible and authoritative documentary photographer.
The Photograph:
The specific photograph of Roy Cohn and Donald Trump at a social event (likely a party at Le Club in June 1979, per Getty Images metadata for similar photos) is a genuine historical document of their association. The documentary used many archival photos and footage from Cohn's personal collection to build its narrative.
Blackvegetable » 01 Jan 2026, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Why are people investing BILLIONS in Artificial Intelligence when all anyone needs to do is consult The Oracle of Lilliput Circle....