sick **** with absolutely no life...Vegas » 06 Jan 2026, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ He thinks you purged my threads. You know how he is always digging through my profile trying to dig up years old threads. He can't find whatever the hell he is looking for. The dude is a stalker. What kind of person spends that much time in people's profiles?
@Blackvegetable
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I did.
^^^Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2026, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ No, that's the thing.
Your thuggery is becoming increasingly shrill, and artless.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom you 'n brown seem more like 69ers...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom **** taint barnacle...
no you didn't, you're still wasting oxygen...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom there you go with more taintspeak...personal observations?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I can appreciate why you are desperate to forget..
Whether or not you get it is irrelevant.
WTF you prattling on about now?Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ I can appreciate why you are desperate to forget..
It went something like
"Geniune historical document"
now no one needs to waste any more space refusing to believe it.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom What you insist never happened.
GOPHERS dig, BIRDS fly, and BV LIES...Vegas » 01 Jan 2026, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ With respect to BV's favorite pic of who he thinks is Trump in drag, he claimed that AI confirmed that was indeed Trump.
One problem. BV edited the statement or fabricated it altogether.
Here was his lie that he claimed AI replied with: The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.
AI completely nuked him. Here is AI's reply about his claim:
My prompt:
AI's reply:
This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.
The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.Vegas » 01 Jan 2026, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ With respect to BV's favorite pic of who he thinks is Trump in drag, he claimed that AI confirmed that was indeed Trump.
One problem. BV edited the statement or fabricated it altogether.
Here was his lie that he claimed AI replied with: The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.
AI completely nuked him. Here is AI's reply about his claim:
My prompt:
AI's reply:
This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.

Oh my God. I literally disproved this. How the **** do you not remember this:Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.
AI's reply:Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."
This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.
It can only:What it cannot do:
- describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
- note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
- or restate what sources claim without verifying them.
“It cannot confirm identity.”
- verify who the person actually is,
- confirm that an attribution is correct,
- declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.
That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit.
You CANNOT disprove it.Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ Oh my God. I literally disproved this. How the **** do you not remember this:
My prompt:
Here was his lie that he claimed AI replied with: The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ You CANNOT disprove it.
The Pre Purge Record shows clearly that you cannot write an AI prompt, or even write at all.
AI's reply:Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."
This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.
It can only:What it cannot do:
- describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
- note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
- or restate what sources claim without verifying them.
“It cannot confirm identity.”
- verify who the person actually is,
- confirm that an attribution is correct,
- declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.
That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit.