Liberal Forum

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 11:00 am

Here was his lie that he claimed AI replied with: The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.

AI completely nuked him. Here is AI's reply about his 

AI doesn't nuke itself.

AI is not for people with 6th grade language skills.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 11:18 am

AI doesn't nuke itself.

AI is not for people with 6th grade language skills.

AI completely nuked him. Here is AI's reply about his claim:

My prompt: 

Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."

AI's reply:

AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.
It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.”
 That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. 

This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 11:19 am

AI completely nuked him. Here is AI's reply about his claim:

My prompt: 

AI's reply:

This would be a good time for him to live stream his suicide for our enjoyment.

That's ****.

AI DID use "external sources"....it is why it offered an UNQUALIFIED confirmation.


You really don't know **** about how AI works, do you...
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 11:23 am

That's ****.

AI DID use "external sources"....it is why it offered an UNQUALIFIED confirmation.

You really don't know **** about how AI works, do you...

****. You keep going on and on about captions and copyright ****. I already addressed that...which means I will be compiling that also.
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 11:18 am

AI doesn't nuke itself.

AI is not for people with 6th grade language skills.

All context used to communicate between ancestors of every ancestral lineage lived and alive in series parallel time currently inhabiting space geometrically present as part of the whole process equally separating total population currently existing one at a time in this atmosphere is pure speculation life exceeds personally adapting forward by heart beats here now in Artificial Intelligence socially employed in every social construct of 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year, regardless a year has 365 rotations or 366 every 4th year to keep facts aligned with actual results adapting in plain sight now.

core of corruption in this species is context over content social behavioral patterns done throughout history recorded in syllables educated to each great great grandchild generation gap forward.

AI was developed by people with a Masters degree in self deception.

ROG62 » 07 Jan 2026, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:39 am

It's come to my conclusion that it seems to me ( just an observation here) you're really lovin' the 'Senior Moderator' position at this juncture in your steadfast life dealing with these crybaby pissants...

I remember previous mods being accused similarly. My turn, I guess.

No amount of denial was good enough back then for that mod.
Went on for months (even years later came up as a topic).
Somebody's oh-so-precious thread blah, blah, blah... 

I barely care as it is for chrissakes. Now I'm doing this extra work too?!  I don't think so.  

If threads are disappeared, I don't give a ****.
Were they secrets to the meaning of life?
Maybe that cancer cure I don't want getting around.
Jimmy Hoffa gravesite.
Musta been something really good, but, there's only about 1% good here so that'd be a stretch...

DeezerShoove » 07 Jan 2026, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:50 pm

I remember previous mods being accused similarly. My turn, I guess.

No amount of denial was good enough back then for that mod.
Went on for months (even years later came up as a topic).
Somebody's oh-so-precious thread blah, blah, blah... 

I barely care as it is for chrissakes. Now I'm doing this extra work too?!  I don't think so.  

If threads are disappeared, I don't give a ****.
Were they secrets to the meaning of life?
Maybe that cancer cure I don't want getting around.
Jimmy Hoffa gravesite.
Musta been something really good, but, there's only about 1% good here so that'd be a stretch...

:die:  

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:55 pm

I'm still waiting for a topic involved in those threads that I got rid of for vegas.

You made an "assertion" (your favoritest word...   ) now back it up, weepy.
Either you made this up
-or-
you actually believe something so **** stupid even I'm a bit agog.

So, liar or really stupid. Which are you?

Deezer Shoove » 07 Jan 2026, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:50 pm

I remember previous mods being accused similarly. My turn, I guess.

No amount of denial was good enough back then for that mod.
Went on for months (even years later came up as a topic).
Somebody's oh-so-precious thread blah, blah, blah... 

I barely care as it is for chrissakes. Now I'm doing this extra work too?!  I don't think so. :wave:  

If threads are disappeared, I don't give a ****.
Were they secrets to the meaning of life?
Maybe that cancer cure I don't want getting around.
Jimmy Hoffa gravesite.
Musta been something really good, but, there's only about 1% good here so that'd be a stretch...

so you side with the controlling majority of people that only obey power of suggestion as 99% of global population do compromising with deniers 24/7, daily here.

*31stArrival » 07 Jan 2026, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 5:02 pm

so you side with the controlling majority of people that only obey power of suggestion as 99% of global population do compromising with deniers 24/7, daily here.

might could be...

Deezer Shoove » 07 Jan 2026, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 6:02 pm

might could be...

What does always did without doubt being an equal part of the whole universal evolving process now.

*31stArrival » 07 Jan 2026, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 6:21 pm

What does always did without doubt being an equal part of the whole universal process now.

It's just that if BV is not on here for fifteen minutes the No Holds Barred is holding their breath that BV had his last.


Can anyone Coozie me a Nomination?

DeezerShoove » 07 Jan 2026, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:50 pm

I remember previous mods being accused similarly. My turn, I guess.

No amount of denial was good enough back then for that mod.
Went on for months (even years later came up as a topic).
Somebody's oh-so-precious thread blah, blah, blah... 

I barely care as it is for chrissakes. Now I'm doing this extra work too?!  I don't think so.  

If threads are disappeared, I don't give a ****.
Were they secrets to the meaning of life?
Maybe that cancer cure I don't want getting around.
Jimmy Hoffa gravesite.
Musta been something really good, but, there's only about 1% good here so that'd be a stretch...

LOL...a thankless title...

did you feel the earth miss a click? I'm surprised you haven't been cybercharged with any cybercrime...