time for self reflection?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom No....you are.
sure side-stepping' tangent boi...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ First we'll add up the time, then you can bitchsplain the results...
But it is far more time than you spend reading.Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ At most, 80 minutes a day is not a considerable amount of time. But I do accept your surrender. When you start a riff about this it is a sign that you lost.
I don't lose.When you start a riff about this it is a sign that you lost.
Just run, bitch..
Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑But it is far more time than you spend reading.Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ At most, 80 minutes a day is not a considerable amount of time. But I do accept your surrender. When you start a riff about this it is a sign that you lost.I don't lose.When you start a riff about this it is a sign that you lost.
It is further proof that you are a slack jawed rube.
Which "facts" are those?Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No, its not.
And yeah, you lose often. Like you are now. You can't refute facts that I post so you divert with this.
You are still talking tough behind anonymity and your keyboard, Too Far.
Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑What's consistently unreliable are your narratives.Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑ Yawn. Let us know when it gets ugly. Your predictions over the years have not been factually reliable.
Russia Russia Trump.
Trump would never be able to get elected.
All the hoaxes you predicted would be his downfall.
Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑LMAO!*Roshambo » 03 Jan 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑Russia Russia Russia hoax is a HOAXHuey » 03 Jan 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ Russia Russia Trump.
Trump would never be able to get elected.
All the hoaxes you predicted would be his downfall.
Found that pee tape yet?
And you know who really funded it. It wasn't the GOP.
Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑*Roshambo » 03 Jan 2026, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑Mueller report, read it.Huey » 03 Jan 2026, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ LMAO!
Found that pee tape yet?
And you know who really funded it. It wasn't the GOP.
I have. No collusion or coordination. Thanks man.
Facts @BlackvegetableHuey » 03 Jan 2026, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ No.....I'm informed.
You watch a **** ton of FOX and read the NYPost.
You're an idiot.
No, I don't watch a **** ton of FOX. Yes, I read the NY Post, as well as articles form MSNBC, CBS, CNN, NPR, WAPO, NYTs. etc etc etc.
You talk a big game behind anonymity and your keyboard, Too Far.
:rofl:
I live in Hampton roads. Tish did by a house in Norfolk, she did list it as her Primary Home, allows a family member to live in it. She did list a multi dwelling building improperly in NYC.
Your proximity affords you no greater capacity to understand what was at issue...
Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Your proximity affords you no greater capacity to understand what was at issue...
If you have any relevant facts, feel free to post them.
There's the fact that you're a moron.
Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2026, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ The television was, as always, set to Fox News, though Greene told me she no longer watched the network because she found it factually unreliable.
![]()
↓Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
neither is this.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.