Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Stop Me If Master Vegetable Made This Point Months Ago....
Stop Me If Master Vegetable Made This Point Months Ago....
By Blackvegetable
5 Jan 2026 9:06 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
5 Jan 2026 11:25 am
5 Jan 2026 11:27 am
Will tRump get blamed when the price goos up?*Roshambo » 05 Jan 2026, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ there must be a reason why the cost of gasoline is down
Is it policy related ?
depends on which side you defend
5 Jan 2026 12:02 pm
Johnny checking out your new shirt......
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
5 Jan 2026 12:05 pm
5 Jan 2026 12:11 pm
Here is the deal:
Deal:
Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Jan 2026 12:12 pm
So **** stupid.
Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!
Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.
Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background.
At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Jan 2026 12:18 pm
Vegas » 05 Jan 2026, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol. Of course not. He is too scared. What he doesn't understand, due to his stupidity, is that him evading this many times makes no difference to me. I genuinely don't care if he answers or not. I know it frightens him every time I ask. That is why I continue.
I ax him all the time to answer
5 Jan 2026 12:19 pm
You are far too **** stupid to use AI.
Your prompt is STILL ****.
Your 4th or 5h attempt?
You are an idiot.
5 Jan 2026 12:20 pm
Your blatant attempt to cover your ****-up is pathetic.Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ You are far too **** stupid to use AI.
Your prompt is STILL ****.
Your 4th or 5h attempt?
You are an idiot.
Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!
Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.
Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background.
At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Jan 2026 1:45 pm
You keep asking if it's a selfieVegas » 05 Jan 2026, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Your blatant attempt to cover your ****-up is pathetic.
Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!
5 Jan 2026 1:49 pm
Here is the deal:
Deal:
Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Jan 2026 2:08 pm
5 Jan 2026 2:33 pm
What did I "**** up"?Vegas » 05 Jan 2026, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Your blatant attempt to cover your ****-up is pathetic.
Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!
One prompt. Unqualified confirmation.
I win.
5 Jan 2026 2:39 pm
Prove it. I would ask for you to come up with the prompt, but we both know how you are with questions and backing up your claims, so it's pointless.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Jan 2026 2:40 pm
Here is the deal:
Deal:
Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Jan 2026 3:33 pm
5 Jan 2026 3:34 pm
Already done...Vegas » 05 Jan 2026, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Prove it. I would ask for you to come up with the prompt, but we both know how you are with questions and backing up your claims, so it's pointless.
5 Jan 2026 3:35 pm
WTF? This has nothing to do with anything. As always, you sidestep hoping that I wouldn't notice.
Do Trump or **** off.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Jan 2026 3:35 pm
Not even close. A painting of George Washington?
try again.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Jan 2026 3:42 pm
Post the prompt, you **** idiot.Vegas » 05 Jan 2026, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑ WTF? This has nothing to do with anything. As always, you sidestep hoping that I wouldn't notice.
Do Trump or **** off.
Who is online
In total there are 5906 users online :: 5 registered, 16 bots, and 5885 guests
Bots: Bolt, BuiltWith, proximic, Not, okhttp, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, ADmantX, NING, Googlebot, YandexBot, bingbot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, curl/7