Liberal Forum

Vegas » 05 Jan 2026, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 8:59 pm

I understand it perfectly. You lied and I caught you. Again. 

Acknowledge that you suck at pretty much everything in life.

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 9:04 pm

AI says that your use of it strongly suggests that you're a goat **** imbecile.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 05 Jan 2026, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 9:09 pm

More envy. ^^^ Bitter.

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 9:09 pm

I don't envy you that, either...

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 05 Jan 2026, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 9:12 pm

Nope. You envy me. It infuriates you that I work in AI and know this stuff inside and out. Your narcissism won't allow you to accept that.

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm

****.

AI laughs at you.

The provided statement relies on several logical fallacies and cognitive shortcuts that undermine its validity as an objective method for finding "truth."

1. The Ad Hominem Fallacy

The logic begins by attacking the source (calling them "stupid ***," "brainless," etc.) rather than addressing the substance of their claims. In formal logic, the reliability or character of a speaker does not automatically invalidate every fact they present. 

2. The "False Dilemma" or Binary Thinking

The argument suggests a binary world where information is either 100% false (from certain outlets) or 100% true (the "complete opposite").

This ignores the reality that: 
Most media bias manifests through selective emphasis or framing, rather than outright fabrication of every detail.

Taking the "complete opposite" of a reported event (e.g., if a source says "it is raining," the opposite is "it is not raining") often leads to a conclusion that is just as factually incorrect as the original might be skewed. 

3. Confirmation Bias and Motivated Reasoning

The statement describes a classic case of motivated reasoning, where an individual seeks to reinforce preexisting beliefs by systematically eliminating or inverting contradictory information. This process creates an "echo chamber" that rewards ideological loyalty over factual accuracy. 

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm

Man am I dumb. I am just begging for Vegas to destroy me.
 

"So something you've never seen is much better than something about which you are, at best, largely ignorant?"

1. False DichotomyOnly two options are presented:

• Option A: Something you’ve never seen
• Option B: Something you are largely ignorant about

As if those are the only epistemic states available.In reality, there are many:

• Direct experience
• Indirect evidence (testimony, data, history)
• Partial knowledge
• Expert consensus
• Rational inference

You do not need firsthand experience to form a justified belief. If that were true:

• No one could choose a medical treatment without personally testing all alternatives.
• No one could avoid cyanide unless they’d tried it.
• No one could judge historical events, distant countries, or future plans.

This is a classic false dilemma.2. Category Error: “Never Seen” ≠ “Unknown”Equating not personally seeing something with total ignorance.That’s simply false.You can “never have seen”:

• A neutron star
• A black hole
• Napoleon
• Hiroshima in 1945

…and still know a great deal about them through:

• Evidence
• Models
• Records
• Reliable testimony

Knowledge ≠ eyeballs.This is an elementary epistemic mistake.3. Self-Refuting PrincipleIf this rule were true:You cannot judge something unless you have personally experienced it.Then the statement fails, because:

• One cannot judge the value of things they have not experienced.
• One cannot argue against positions that rely on indirect knowledge.
• One cannot prefer one unexperienced option over another without violating their own rule.

This argument saws off the branch it’s sitting on.4. Straw Man FramingIt doesn’t address:

• Evidence
• Reasons
• Probabilities
• Risk assessment
• Comparative analysis

Instead, it caricatures the position as:“preferring total ignorance over partial ignorance”That’s not what’s being argued. The real issue is how we form justified beliefs, not whether ignorance is “better.”5. The Hidden Emotional PlayThis line isn’t meant to clarify—it’s meant to:

• Sound clever
• Force one into a defensive posture
• Shift the discussion from reasoning to ridicule

Classic rhetorical misdirection.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 05 Jan 2026, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 9:31 pm

Here you go: 
This is what AI has to say about this:

• Direct experience
• Indirect evidence (testimony, data, history)
• Partial knowledge
• Expert consensus
• Rational inference

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 9:41 pm

In addressing a livestock molesting illiterate, which of the following conditions would you anticipate are met

• Direct experience
• Indirect evidence (testimony, data, history)
• Partial knowledge
• Expert consensus
• Rational inference

?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 1:19 pm

You are far too **** stupid to use AI.

Your prompt is STILL ****.

Your 4th or 5h attempt?

You are an idiot.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 4:42 pm

Post the prompt, you **** idiot.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Vegas » 05 Jan 2026, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 8:46 pm

Are these your words?

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

ROG62 » 05 Jan 2026, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 11:02 pm

now ****...

ROG62 » 05 Jan 2026, 11:00 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 11:00 pm

run while you can...

ROG62 » 05 Jan 2026, 11:00 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 11:00 pm

run while you can...

Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2026, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2026, 7:34 am

Go pry my boot out of your rube ***..

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2026, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2026, 7:39 am

I just field dressed him, brainless piece of ****.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2026, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jan 2026, 7:52 am

The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source.

Now **** off, guido.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2026, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 10:06 am

Trump Says We Have the “Hottest” Economy. Markets Tell a Different Story.

The U.S. economy entered 2025 as the “envy of the world.” It exited well behind its peers.

Some of it may be that they believe there’s a huge, sustainable Trump boom just around the corner. It didn’t come by the end of 2025, but perhaps it’ll arrive this quarter . . . or next quarter . . . or the end of 2026, per the latest goalpost-moving forecasts from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/trump-says ... rent-story

There's certainly an abundance of Less.