jerrab » 06 Jan 2026, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑ thank trump
--------------------------------------------------
- Expanded Work Mandate: Homeless individuals, along with others newly subject to the rules (such as adults aged 55-64 and veterans), must now work at least 80 hours per month, participate in qualifying education/training programs, or volunteer to maintain their eligibility for more than three months in a three-year period.
- Implementation Challenges: Public health experts note that meeting such requirements can be extremely challenging for those experiencing homelessness due to a lack of stable housing, transportation, and reliable addresses for correspondence, which could effectively exclude them from eligibility. Research suggests increasing work requirements often leads to people losing benefits due to administrative hurdles rather than increasing employment.
jerrab » 06 Jan 2026, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑ maga is what trump is all about and maga says no matter what trump does.says is right, trump stopped food stamps to all homeless people which includes vets but no trump supporter says a thing about that,
DeezerShoove » 06 Jan 2026, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ No ****? When did I do that?
Seems weird since I don't mind when utter trash is blowed up reel gud.
DeezerShoove » 06 Jan 2026, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Huh... Vets get **** you say.
All vets?
Or does being a vet provide automatic immunity from the travails of life?
I know a couple vets that are pieces of ****. So, there's that...
DeezerShoove » 06 Jan 2026, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Huh... Vets get **** you say.
All vets?
Or does being a vet provide automatic immunity from the travails of life?
I know a couple vets that are pieces of ****. So, there's that...
Obviously, Granny, you know nothing. You can whatever the **** you want. I am practicing MY free speech rights by education you on to he situation.jerrab » 06 Jan 2026, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑ i could care less.
all I know is that you are against free speech whenever it is against trump and kelly was correct what he said so to protect trump you bring up all of a sudden what happened 15 years ago.
jerra » wrote:DeezerShoove » 05 Jan 2026, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑ I look at this (your post) as another grasp at anything to make the opposition squirm a little.
Do you actually give a **** about the pieces of **** being put down? Of course not.
I openly admit I don't give a **** about "what it took" to destroy the target.
"What it took" was two not one... Keep having kittens.
you obviously don't give a **** about war crimes. whatever it took was the first strike dumb ***.