Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"But How Stupid, Master Vegetable?" - The @rog62 Edition
"But How Stupid, Master Vegetable?" - The @rog62 Edition
By Blackvegetable
6 Jan 2026 8:20 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
6 Jan 2026 8:20 am
MAGAts, who dutifully averted their eyes from the Jan 6th Hearings, will confidently assert that one of the witnesses - whose testimony MAGAts refuse to watch - has been contradicted under oath and therefore "impeached".
To "prove" this, the will refer to a snippet from a Press Release of the House's Revisionist Version of Events (a THIRD derivative of The Record), as follows:
During the Select Committee’s sensationalized prime-time hearings, Hutchinson was their surprise, "star witness". Hutchinson testified under oath that she heard that Trump had lunged at the steering wheel of the presidential SUV and engaged in a physical altercation with his lead Secret Service agent after being told they were not going to the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Our Subcommittee's "Initial Findings Report" released in March shows that other White House employees did not corroborate Hutchinson’s dramatic account, and instead directly refuted it. The Select Committee was in possession of these accounts but chose to hide them, and instead promoted Hutchinson’s scandalous narrative.
https://cha.house.gov/2024/10/new-texts ... -unethical
Note the COMPLETE absence of particulars.
Because ****, like @ROG62 , take what is fed to them by their **** sources as gospel.
But given the actual facts of the matter, how does the subcommittee get there?
https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/d/9/ ... report.pdf
Watch how stupid people manipulate Scrapie ravaged sheep...
To "prove" this, the will refer to a snippet from a Press Release of the House's Revisionist Version of Events (a THIRD derivative of The Record), as follows:
During the Select Committee’s sensationalized prime-time hearings, Hutchinson was their surprise, "star witness". Hutchinson testified under oath that she heard that Trump had lunged at the steering wheel of the presidential SUV and engaged in a physical altercation with his lead Secret Service agent after being told they were not going to the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Our Subcommittee's "Initial Findings Report" released in March shows that other White House employees did not corroborate Hutchinson’s dramatic account, and instead directly refuted it. The Select Committee was in possession of these accounts but chose to hide them, and instead promoted Hutchinson’s scandalous narrative.
https://cha.house.gov/2024/10/new-texts ... -unethical
Note the COMPLETE absence of particulars.
Because ****, like @ROG62 , take what is fed to them by their **** sources as gospel.
But given the actual facts of the matter, how does the subcommittee get there?
https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/d/9/ ... report.pdf
Watch how stupid people manipulate Scrapie ravaged sheep...
6 Jan 2026 8:43 am
Here is what the report asserts...
. Hutchinson’s testimony in her fourth transcribed interview and her public testimony are directly contradicted by the White House employees’ and USSS agent’s transcribed interviews which were never released publicly.
(pg. 33)
Strong statement
So to what did Cassidy testify?
Hutchinson was not in the SUV at the time but said she heard the account from Tony Ornato, a senior Secret Service official who was at the time White House deputy chief of staff for operations, when everyone was back at the White House. Also in the room was Bobby Engel, the head of Trump's security detail, Hutchinson said.
"The president said something to the effect of, 'I'm the effing president, take me up to the Capitol now' -- to which Bobby responded, 'Sir, we have to go back to the West Wing,'" she continued. "The president reached up toward the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel. Mr. Engel grabbed his arm and said, 'Sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel. We're going back to the West Wing. We're not going to the Capitol.'
"Mr. Trump then used his free hand to lunge toward Bobby Engel and when Mr. Ornato recounted this story to me, he motioned toward his clavicles," she said.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/key-tak ... d=85880256
She testifies to A CONVERSATION to which she was party. She is NOT testifying to what occurred in the SUV.
The ONLY people on the planet capable of DIRECTLY CONTRADICTING Cassidy on this point are the two other parties to the alleged conversation..
Is this clear so far, Imbeciles?
. Hutchinson’s testimony in her fourth transcribed interview and her public testimony are directly contradicted by the White House employees’ and USSS agent’s transcribed interviews which were never released publicly.
(pg. 33)
Strong statement
So to what did Cassidy testify?
Hutchinson was not in the SUV at the time but said she heard the account from Tony Ornato, a senior Secret Service official who was at the time White House deputy chief of staff for operations, when everyone was back at the White House. Also in the room was Bobby Engel, the head of Trump's security detail, Hutchinson said.
"The president said something to the effect of, 'I'm the effing president, take me up to the Capitol now' -- to which Bobby responded, 'Sir, we have to go back to the West Wing,'" she continued. "The president reached up toward the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel. Mr. Engel grabbed his arm and said, 'Sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel. We're going back to the West Wing. We're not going to the Capitol.'
"Mr. Trump then used his free hand to lunge toward Bobby Engel and when Mr. Ornato recounted this story to me, he motioned toward his clavicles," she said.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/key-tak ... d=85880256
She testifies to A CONVERSATION to which she was party. She is NOT testifying to what occurred in the SUV.
The ONLY people on the planet capable of DIRECTLY CONTRADICTING Cassidy on this point are the two other parties to the alleged conversation..
Is this clear so far, Imbeciles?
6 Jan 2026 8:54 am
The OBVIOUS choice to "directly contradict" Cassidy would be the person described as telling the story of what occurred in the SUV, specifically Tony Ornato...
So a reader couldn't be blamed for anticipating damning unequivocal testimony from Tony, cited verbatim.
Assuming, of course, that said reader isn't a ******* sheep.
So a reader couldn't be blamed for anticipating damning unequivocal testimony from Tony, cited verbatim.
Assuming, of course, that said reader isn't a ******* sheep.
6 Jan 2026 8:59 am
The Report proceeds
In Ornato’s November 29, 2022, transcribed interview, he directly refuted Hutchinson’s testimony that she allegedly heard the story about what happened in the Beast. Ornato testified that the first time he had ever heard the story Hutchinson claims Ornato told her on January 6, was during Hutchinson’s public testimony.196
Really?
In Ornato’s November 29, 2022, transcribed interview, he directly refuted Hutchinson’s testimony that she allegedly heard the story about what happened in the Beast. Ornato testified that the first time he had ever heard the story Hutchinson claims Ornato told her on January 6, was during Hutchinson’s public testimony.196
Really?
6 Jan 2026 9:04 am
That is NOT a "direct refutation"...it is a "I do not recall" hedge...
Why would Ornato not simply deny it as "preposterous" and insist he never had such a conversation?
6 Jan 2026 9:14 am
How often are you going to "re-litigate" this?
BV is in question time out indefinitely, but no earlier than Mar 2026.
BV supports political killing viewtopic.php?p=2795489#p2795489
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV supports political killing viewtopic.php?p=2795489#p2795489
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
6 Jan 2026 9:15 am
Ornato, and the subcommittee's, problem is the " Third Man"...
Mark Meadows is the other party, identified by Cassidy, as being present.
Mark Meadows is fighting an invitation to testify, under oath.
Note that he does not do so for the subcommittee either....
Ornato MUST hedge in the event Meadows is compelled to testify...because Tony can't rely on Meadows to lie on his behalf....
Mark Meadows is the other party, identified by Cassidy, as being present.
Mark Meadows is fighting an invitation to testify, under oath.
Note that he does not do so for the subcommittee either....
Ornato MUST hedge in the event Meadows is compelled to testify...because Tony can't rely on Meadows to lie on his behalf....
6 Jan 2026 9:18 am
The obvious bottom line is that
Cassidy HASN'T been contradicted.
MAGAts are cretinous rubes lacking critical capacity. Irredeemably and reliably dumb as ****.
Any questions?
Cassidy HASN'T been contradicted.
MAGAts are cretinous rubes lacking critical capacity. Irredeemably and reliably dumb as ****.
Any questions?
6 Jan 2026 9:22 am
6 Jan 2026 9:34 am
6 Jan 2026 9:41 am
Blackvegetable » Today, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ MAGAts, who dutifully averted their eyes from the Jan 6th Hearings, will confidently assert that one of the witnesses - whose testimony MAGAts refuse to watch - has been contradicted under oath and therefore "impeached".
To "prove" this, the will refer to a snippet from a Press Release of the House's Revisionist Version of Events (a THIRD derivative of The Record), as follows:
During the Select Committee’s sensationalized prime-time hearings, Hutchinson was their surprise, "star witness". Hutchinson testified under oath that she heard that Trump had lunged at the steering wheel of the presidential SUV and engaged in a physical altercation with his lead Secret Service agent after being told they were not going to the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Our Subcommittee's "Initial Findings Report" released in March shows that other White House employees did not corroborate Hutchinson’s dramatic account, and instead directly refuted it. The Select Committee was in possession of these accounts but chose to hide them, and instead promoted Hutchinson’s scandalous narrative.
https://cha.house.gov/2024/10/new-texts ... -unethical
Note the COMPLETE absence of particulars.
Because ****, like @ROG62 , take what is fed to them by their **** sources as gospel.
But given the actual facts of the matter, how does the subcommittee get there?
https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/d/9/ ... report.pdf
Watch how stupid people manipulate Scrapie ravaged sheep...
Here is the deal:
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
6 Jan 2026 11:06 am
6 Jan 2026 11:08 am
6 Jan 2026 11:26 am
Stop pretending that you don't know how to end this.
And **** your same damn lies. Come up with something more original. Coward.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
17 Jan 2026 6:59 am
She sure looks good coming out of the shower.Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2026, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ The OBVIOUS choice to "directly contradict" Cassidy would be the person described as telling the story of what occurred in the SUV, specifically Tony Ornato...
So a reader couldn't be blamed for anticipating damning unequivocal testimony from Tony, cited verbatim.
Assuming, of course, that said reader isn't a ******* sheep.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
17 Jan 2026 7:14 am
She's cute, but heavy bottomed.
17 Jan 2026 7:18 am
Just one.....don't you know what hearsay means?Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ The obvious bottom line is that
Cassidy HASN'T been contradicted.
MAGAts are cretinous rubes lacking critical capacity. Irredeemably and reliably dumb as ****.
Any questions?
17 Jan 2026 7:21 am
:rofl: :die:
Are you going to stick around to be humiliated, or do you want to take off now?
17 Jan 2026 7:22 am
Was that answer or another question?Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑
Are you going to stick around to be humiliated, or do you want to take off now?
17 Jan 2026 7:38 am
Gator,
I'm gonna skin you.
Do you want to do this?
Who is online
In total there are 4288 users online :: 14 registered, 17 bots, and 4257 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Squatchman, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, LowIQTrash, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: SiteLockSpider, MicroMessenger, DuckDuckBot, facebookexternalhit, Bolt, ADmantX, LCC, proximic, MaxPointCrawler, YandexBot, bingbot, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, Applebot, Baiduspider, curl/7