Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑I think you're a ******, like your daddy before you.
Now post what you believe is "hearsay" in Cassidy's testimony.
Her entire testimony in regards to what she heard....are you a **** imbecile?Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ I think you're a ******, like your daddy before you.
Now post what you believe is "hearsay" in Cassidy's testimony.
You are too stupid to bluff.RebelGator » 25 Jan 2026, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑ Her entire testimony in regards to what she heard....are you a **** imbecile?
Before you start to bleat about my sources
Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ You are too stupid to bluff.
I don't give a **** what you've been told to believe.
Answer the question.
2nd postHuey » 25 Jan 2026, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ You answer the question. What testimony are YOU referring to? What are you afraid of?
Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑2nd postHuey » 25 Jan 2026, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ You answer the question. What testimony are YOU referring to? What are you afraid of?
viewtopic.php?p=2835793#p2835793
Nod.
**** idiot.
Don't know about Huey, but I had to ketchup on a few normal posters and couldn't relish the thought or mustar the patience to **** with you.Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ Are @Huey & @RebelGator off to find condiments?
Huey » 25 Jan 2026, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Not an idiot. I am quite familiar with your ability to slither away because you simply refuse to take a stand and are intentionally ambiguous. It is very important for a snake like you too publicly post specifically post what you are talking about.
Thank you for finally doing so. Her statement was hearsay. That's all we need to know. As what I posted said. And Smith testified that although it was hearsay he still did not decide to to remove her form the witness list.
You never provide an example.Not an idiot. I am quite familiar with your ability to slither away because you simply refuse to take a stand and are intentionally ambiguous. It is very important for a snake like you too publicly post specifically post what you are talking about. Thank you for finally doing so.
she was party to the conversation.Thank you for finally doing so. Her statement was hearsay. That's all we need to know. As what I posted said.
He took the bullet for you and @ROG62 ...
Now you are redefining hearsay.Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑Huey » 25 Jan 2026, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Not an idiot. I am quite familiar with your ability to slither away because you simply refuse to take a stand and are intentionally ambiguous. It is very important for a snake like you too publicly post specifically post what you are talking about.
Thank you for finally doing so. Her statement was hearsay. That's all we need to know. As what I posted said. And Smith testified that although it was hearsay he still did not decide to to remove her form the witness list.You never provide an example.Not an idiot. I am quite familiar with your ability to slither away because you simply refuse to take a stand and are intentionally ambiguous. It is very important for a snake like you too publicly post specifically post what you are talking about. Thank you for finally doing so.
Post the date of my 7th post of this thread.she was party to the conversation.Thank you for finally doing so. Her statement was hearsay. That's all we need to know. As what I posted said.
What she describes is not testimony of illegal acts. It wouldn't be disallowed as "hearsay".
Smith's decision has nothing to do with her credibility, it is about relevance.
She has not been contradicted by either of the others.
You don't know any of the detail, only the slogan.
Testifying to details of a conversation to which she is party is NOT "hearsay".
Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑Testifying to details of a conversation to which she is party is NOT "hearsay".
Post the date requested.
You're in arrears.
You insisted I answer my own question.
Southern Fried MAGA is 100% sure they will take the mid turd elections.Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ You insisted I answer my own question.
I did.
Then you lied.
Now post the date of my 7th post of this thread.
That, and their complete lack of integrity.JohnnyYou » 25 Jan 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Southern Fried MAGA is 100% sure they will take the mid turd elections.
The stupidity of these folks is mindboggling.. The must do all their shopping at Hoodwinked and Bamboozled.
Stay safe if you are in snow.. I had that little chest pang digging.. They are getting more frequent.
Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑You insisted I answer my own question.
I did.
Then you lied.
Now post the date of my 7th post of this thread.
I find it hard to believe there is enough trash in the country to get a Democrat elected.....without having to rig an election.JohnnyYou » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Southern Fried MAGA is 100% sure they will take the mid turd elections.
The stupidity of these folks is mindboggling.. The must do all their shopping at Hoodwinked and Bamboozled.
Stay safe if you are in snow.. I had that little chest pang digging.. They are getting more frequent.
Huey, who has time to chase every No Helds Beered rabbit hole mission you send us on?Huey » 25 Jan 2026, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ After you have taken the pledge. That was part of it. The moment you do I will post the date of your 7th post on this thread. Contrary to your ****, BitchVegetable, I am a man of my word.